Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Penfield45 said:

 

how is online school a disaster? 

Lack of attention span. Teachers not able to spot abuse at home. Minor things for people like you who support child abuse.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

And this was a "well-managed" state. Notice how the "well-managed" states all have the highest death totals?

 

Because they're so "well-managed."

 

 

 

Needs to be a criminal investigation if they've told Doctors to stop prescribing HCQ. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

So looks like California is going back to shutdown mode eh? What a mistake. LA and San Diego county online school for the fall. What a disaster.

 

 

Teachers are so stupid.  Slitting their own throats and don't even realize.

 

Let's just if....if virtual is such a viable alternative to in person (it isnt), then why ever go back to school again?  

 

You already have Cuomo "reimagining" schools.  Wth do they think that means?  Cut education budget you can cut property taxes and convince the wealthy people wondering why the hell they're staying there to not leave. 

 

But oh wait Dems love teachers!  

 

Yup.  They loved our factory workers in manufacturing, coal miners, and auto workers once to.  

 

They have no idea what they're in for.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Penfield45 said:

 

to help its people? why did the wealthiest country to ever exist in history only could afford a measly 1200 one time check? Look how much Canada has helped its citizens. 

 

Why did they send billions to business who didn't even need a stimulus check and left the working class rotting away? 

people have been getting paid  $1000 a week to not work...how in the holy hell does that equal $1200.

 

Are you that freaking dumb? PPP loans in the billions to keep people getting paid and businesses open so they have a job to go back to. The fed backstopping the corporate debt markets so companies have access to the public debt and equity markets to keep millions of people employed. Do you not understand even basic economic theory? Do you understand that the government should not be handing out money to people not affected financially. 

 

and oh, just for fudge sake ..lets look at this

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/07/13/june-2020-budget-deficit-coronavirus/

 

Now i know why you hate capitalism, you too dumb to understand it

Edited by plenzmd1
Posted
Just now, Joe in Winslow said:

And this just in, 5 months later, I STILL don't know anyone with COVID, nor do I know anyone who knows anyone else with COVID.

 

What a pandemic.

 

 

Me neither as of yet.

 

But have neighbors really nice people.  That know some people had it. Gave me sad stories :( 

Posted
8 minutes ago, LB3 said:

Lack of attention span. Teachers not able to spot abuse at home. Minor things for people like you who support child abuse.

 

Never mind that for many, many schools, the spring was a horrendous learning experience for the kids.  I won't put too much blame on the schools for how they handled something that was never in the districts' disaster continuity plans (Trump's fault obviously)

 

But the bigger concern now is that I'm not hearing of many places getting ready to provide a better online learning environment in the fall.  The schools are throwing it back at the politicians, who are making it impossible to plan for the school year without a clear plan for the return. 

 

This fall will be a mess in most states, with the students and the parents bearing the full weight of the ineptitude.   But according to the Penfields of the world, this is one of the attractive features of more government edicts & regulations.

2 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

And this just in, 5 months later, I STILL don't know anyone with COVID, nor do I know anyone who knows anyone else with COVID.

 

What a pandemic.

 

 

Same state, different world.   

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Same state, different world.   

 

I have a relative in northern NJ. 6 people in the household. None of them with COVID.


Actually, I have TWO households of relatives in northern NJ without COVID.

 

 

 

Edited by Joe in Winslow
Posted
1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said:

And this just in, 5 months later, I STILL don't know anyone with COVID, nor do I know anyone who knows anyone else with COVID.

 

What a pandemic.

 

i know plenty of folks who have had it, prolly approaching close to 20 now. 

 

Out of those 20, i'd say about half being  being adults between 50-80..one person hospitalized, and that person was in ICU for two days and pretty damn sick.But this dude is a world traveler, and in ICU literally that  weekend in mid March when all the poop hit the fan, and treatment etc was no where near what is is today.

 

BTW,played golf with that dude the weekend before that, shaking hands ,  beers after..all regular golf stuff..but we did walk so prolly why i did not get it

 

The virus is not a hoax, the reality of what danger the virus poses is the real hoax.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
Just now, Joe in Winslow said:

 

I have a relative in northern NJ. 6 people in the household. None of them with COVID.

 

 

 

Were they tested?   Most of the people I know who were + for the virus or antibodies had few, if any symptoms.  Of course, others had severe battles.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, plenzmd1 said:

The virus is not a hoax, the reality of what danger the virus poses is the real hoax.


Which, in my estimation, makes the virus a hoax.

 

I said it back in March, the cure is worse than the disease. Now that I see how all these petty autocrats are respinding to it, I have no doubt what it's really all about.

 

1 minute ago, GG said:

 

Were they tested?   Most of the people I know who were + for the virus or antibodies had few, if any symptoms.  Of course, others had severe battles.

 

I couldn't tell you that.

 

Most of them are under the age of 50, with the exception of one individual who's 51.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said:


Which, in my estimation, makes the virus a hoax.

 

I said it back in March, the cure is worse than the disease. Now that I see how all these petty autocrats are respinding to it, I have no doubt what it's really all about.

 

 

I couldn't tell you that.

 

Most of them are under the age of 50, with the exception of one individual who's 51.

 

 

It would be surprising that no one had it in a household of 6 in North NJ, especially if they're in a commuting county.  They're probably the outliers, not the norm up here.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, GG said:

 

It would be surprising that no one had it in a household of 6 in North NJ, especially if they're in a commuting county.  They're probably the outliers, not the norm up here.

 

4 of the 6 are kids, and both adults have been locked down since this whole thing started. And yeah, they're about 10 minutes west of Newark.

 

 

Remember when this was about 14 days to "flatten the curve?"

 

12dkf6.jpg

Edited by Joe in Winslow
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

And this just in, 5 months later, I STILL don't know anyone with COVID, nor do I know anyone who knows anyone else with COVID.

 

What a pandemic.

 

My cousin on Long Island had it then didnt then did then didnt then didnt then did then didnt then didnt so he could go back to work. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

4 of the 6 are kids, and both adults have been locked down since this whole thing started. And yeah, they're about 10 minutes west of Newark.

 

 

Remember when this was about 14 days to "flatten the curve?"

 

12dkf6.jpg

 

Newark & surrounding towns got hit hard.  Chances are the virus came & went in their home, especially with 4 kids.

Posted
Just now, GG said:

 

Newark & surrounding towns got hit hard.  Chances are the virus came & went in their home, especially with 4 kids.

 

Welp, all I can tell you is none of them ever tested positive for it.

 

Posted

 

CDC's 'best estimate' is 40 percent COVID-19 infections are asymptomatic

A person with COVID-19 is still 'likely to infect' 2.5 other people

By Chris Ciaccia | Fox News

 

In updated guidance, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said its "best estimate" is that 40 percent of people infected with COVID-19 are asymptomatic.

In the update, posted July 10, the CDC said the basic reproduction number or the number of people one person "is likely to infect" is 2.5, and the infectiousness level of asymptomatic people is 75 percent, relative to symptomatic patients.

The government agency added a new part to its report, an "Infection Fatality Ratio," which "takes into account both symptomatic and asymptomatic cases and may therefore be a more directly measurable parameter for disease severity for COVID-19." The new metric states that 0.65 percent of those with COVID-19 are estimated to die.

 

In late May, the CDC estimated that 35 percent of patients could be asymptomatic, Fox News previously reported. In April, the CDC estimated some 25 percent of cases could be asymptomatic.

 

Asymptomatic COVID-19 patients are of great concern to public health officials and lawmakers due to their ability to spread the virus without knowing they're sick themselves.

In June, an official from the World Health Organization said that spread from asymptomatic patients appeared to be "very rare." The comments were walked back a few days later following criticism from many in the scientific community, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, who said the statement was "not correct."

 

https://www.foxnews.com/science/cdc-best-estimate-40-percent-covid-19-infections-asymptomatic

×
×
  • Create New...