Jump to content

The Sham Impeachment Inquiry & Whistleblower Saga: A Race to Get Ahead of the OIG


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

censure for what?

 

 

For being a moron that can't conduct foreign policy without even avoiding the vague appearance of a conflict of interest.  

 

As consistent as I've been in insisting this "evidence" is ambiguous and nothing more than hearsay and interpretation through a priori assumptions, the other side of that is that Trump was too damn stupid to avoid creating the ambiguity in the first place.  And don't forget the other of the two reasons I wanted Trump as president: to encourage Congress to do its job and exercise proper oversight.  So censure him for being a reckless little man-child, and exercise the goddamn oversight already.

Just now, Gary Busey said:

 

Bipartisan censure on the above basis would be oodles more exciting and better for the country than impeachment. 

 

And you probably could get a decent number of Republicans on board with it, I'll bet.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Tiberius said:

If we are still allowed by the Trump Dynasty to write history in the future perhaps these pieces of evidence will shed light on more criminal

activity by the president 

 

 

 

The House Intelligence Committee now has access to several video and audio recordings as well as photographs that include President Trump and his attorney Rudy Giuliani.

Hell, they have biden on video bragging about how he extorted Ukraine and the looney left doesn't give 2 Schiff's about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

For being a moron that can't conduct foreign policy without even avoiding the vague appearance of a conflict of interest.  

 

As consistent as I've been in insisting this "evidence" is ambiguous and nothing more than hearsay and interpretation through a priori assumptions, the other side of that is that Trump was too damn stupid to avoid creating the ambiguity in the first place.  And don't forget the other of the two reasons I wanted Trump as president: to encourage Congress to do its job and exercise proper oversight.  So censure him for being a reckless little man-child, and exercise the goddamn oversight already.

 

And you probably could get a decent number of Republicans on board with it, I'll bet.  

 

DC, if i despise you i can turn everything you do into a conflict of interest, and tell the media how to scream about it 24/7

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

And you probably could get a decent number of Republicans on board with it, I'll bet.  

 

You are probably correct. It would save face for Reps, as well as Dems in purple districts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

For being a moron that can't conduct foreign policy without even avoiding the vague appearance of a conflict of interest.  

 

As consistent as I've been in insisting this "evidence" is ambiguous and nothing more than hearsay and interpretation through a priori assumptions, the other side of that is that Trump was too damn stupid to avoid creating the ambiguity in the first place.  And don't forget the other of the two reasons I wanted Trump as president: to encourage Congress to do its job and exercise proper oversight.  So censure him for being a reckless little man-child, and exercise the goddamn oversight already.

 

And you probably could get a decent number of Republicans on board with it, I'll bet.  

I wouldn't give the corrupt left one inch at all. The President of the United states should never be censured. That's f'n ridiculous to even suggest. How about censuring you? Would you be for that? Whether I agree with your views or not, I would fight against that with everything I have.

Give the socialist pigs exactly what they deserve, absolutely nothing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

And you probably could get a decent number of Republicans on board with it, I'll bet.  

 

No way - the cult is strong. 

 

Just now, westside2 said:

I wouldn't give the corrupt left one inch at all. The President of the United states should never be censured. That's f'n ridiculous to even suggest. How about censuring you? Would you be for that? Whether I agree with your views or not, I would fight against that with everything I have.

Give the socialist pigs exactly what they deserve, absolutely nothing!

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

No way - the cult is strong. 

 

 

 

This message brought to you by the bald pp head at cnn

Personally I would rather be in the cult of Trump as opposed to the cult of lil brian stelter

....anyday 

Edited by Albwan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

can we start to try to delete the text from tibs and gary and "the likely lads" every time we respond to them?

 

 

i really don't want to be bothered by anything they have to say, worse than the subway hoboes who smell like formaldehyde

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...