Tiberius Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 3 minutes ago, dubs said: what are you talking about? im entertaining your theories here. You’re not making any sense. The Dems are currently going through this impeachment inquiry about Ukraine. This Cohen fiasco happened last year. If what you’re saying Is true, why didn’t they just or don’t they just impeach on this obvious campaign finance crime (you’re words not mine) Dems just letting criminal justice system do its job there. Trump trying to steal the next election required immediate attention though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 8 minutes ago, dubs said: Im just playing out Tibs logic. <----- (there's your problem) he said trump committed a crime via Michael Cohen, but he can’t be indicted in court. My question is then why don’t the Dems impeach based on the crimes Tibs is saying Trump committed? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Yuppers... and people pay money to listen to this in class. No wonder reason and debate has gone the way of the dodo bird among our "betters". 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: Yuppers... and people pay money to listen to this in class. No wonder reason and debate has gone the way of the dodo bird among our "betters". gone the way of? (it's always been that way, just that everyone thinks they are the first to discover it.... so cute and sweet people are built this way....) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrober38 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 8 minutes ago, dubs said: what are you talking about? im entertaining your theories here. You’re not making any sense. The Dems are currently going through this impeachment inquiry about Ukraine. This Cohen fiasco happened last year. If what you’re saying Is true, why didn’t they just or don’t they just impeach on this obvious campaign finance crime (you’re words not mine) It happened before he was President. Impeachment is for conduct while sitting in office. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 Just now, jrober38 said: It happened before he was President. Impeachment is for conduct while sitting in office. Cohen is in jail for not paying his taxes. He's not in jail for anything to do with the 2016 election. You're pushing false news because you're too programmed to read court filings for yourself and are still relying on proven liars and manipulators to interpret them for you. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Just now, row_33 said: gone the way of? (it's always been that way, just that everyone thinks they are the first to discover it.... so cute and sweet people are built this way....) People used to debate. They used to have reasons based on more than feelings for doing XYZ. None of these people are spring chickens, so there is little excuse except for living in a brain-washing bubble. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 At least Mitt isn't carrying Putins water It now seems that not all Senate Republicans are intent on mimicking Kennedy’s example. Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) commented to reporters: “I saw no evidence from our intelligence community nor from our representatives today from the Department of State that there is any evidence of any kind that suggests Ukraine interfered in our elections. We have ample evidence that Russia interfered.” He dismissed Kennedy’s reliance on news reports that the senator from Louisiana falsely claimed implicated Ukraine. "We have to adhere to the facts that’s presented to us by our intelligence community. And I know some people will look at newspaper accounts and say, ‘Gee, this is what I read in the newspaper,’ Romney said. “But not every article is exactly accurate, and sometimes your articles are being promoted by an intelligence source that is trying to push a narrative that is not in our interest.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/12/04/senate-republicans-wont-remove-trump-they-might-not-spin-so-hard-him/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 She's going to be very ineffective at turning any public sentiment. (They all will be terrible at it but she just came off terribly.) 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Joe Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Yuppers... and people pay money to listen to this in class. No wonder reason and debate has gone the way of the dodo bird among our "betters". One must write essays to appease the prof if you want good grades. Why I liked math and science better, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Michael Gerhardt (University of NC Law Professor) President is guilty of bribery, obstruction of justice, obstruction of congress. Another "impartial witness!!" Whoohooo!! Did Nadler put out a call for nutty, smug, partisan hacks? If so, he got some "good" ones. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 3 minutes ago, jrober38 said: It happened before he was President. Impeachment is for conduct while sitting in office. that’s not true. At best it’s unclear. There is precedent for impeachment of district judges for conduct before he was in office. If Dems thought they had him on that, we’d have seen this charade last year. Point is they don’t, and Tibs still can’t point to a single “crime” committed by this president. No one can. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: People used to debate. They used to have reasons based on more than feelings for doing XYZ. None of these people are spring chickens, so there is little excuse except for living in a brain-washing bubble. it's the most free and open era for information and discussion eveer there are 100s of great websites and other means to deliver intelligent conversation and study.... if you are stuck in a horrible rut, get out of it, all you have to do is stop volunteering for that rut... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Joe Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Michael Gerhardt (University of NC Law Professor) President is guilty of bribery, obstruction of justice, obstruction of congress. Another "impartial witness!!" Whoohooo!! Did Nadler put out a call for nutty, smug, partisan hacks? If so, he got some "good" ones. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts