JDHillFan Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, teef said: what strikes me odd is that the few posters that are insistent that our kids are in danger from trans in schools are the same ones who don't want the epstein files released. it's an amazing dance. Can you point to a single post from anyone, just one, in which the poster claims they don’t want the files released or even hints at that? I suspect you can’t, in which case your post above is complete horseshit. 1 hour ago, teef said: unfortunately there's a group of people who will believe absolutely anything they're told. You were talking to one with this reply. He believes boys can become girls. Go figure.
The Frankish Reich Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Thomas Massie's Latest Epstein Files Claim Is Too Cute by Half FTA: MASSIE: Some people have said, ‘Well, how will you know that he’s released the files?’ We will know when rich and powerful men are implicated. So they’ve claimed that they’ve been releasing thousands, tens of thousands of documents to Congress already. But what we’ve discovered is there’s not a single new name in those documents. We know because we have survivors through their lawyers who’ve told us that they have names. We know, they know who’s in those files, and we’ll know if he’s given us a complete release. Let me stop him right there because that's not how this works. The absence of evidence is not evidence in and of itself, and it's a logical fallacy to assert that unless the files tell him what he wants to hear, that must indicate there are more files. If there's not a "single new name," it is perfectly possible that's because there are no more names. Suspicions of a broader conspiracy, and I've had my own over the years surrounding this case, are not sufficient in this context. As to the claim that there are survivors who have "told us that they have names," that is hopelessly ambiguous. What if the names are just the names we already know? Regardless, at some point, and that point was a while ago, if they aren't willing to release the names and make their accusations public, then there's nothing else to be done here. I realize the response will be that they signed NDAs, but NDAs can not legally be used to cover up criminal activity, and in such a situation, can be broken to report the crime to the police. This entire thing has turned into a game of circular logic, where a lack of evidence is treated as evidence, and the best sources (the victims) aren't expected to actually be sources. Why would I care what Epstein's emails say if almost all the women he trafficked are alive and able to testify? If rich and powerful people committed sex crimes in conjunction with Epstein, then they need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Turning this purely into a political issue, absconding from any attempt at legal justice against these suggested other perpetrators, is just a bit too convenient for me. I think Massie knows that, but he's so deep in his own sauce that he can't be objective anymore. https://redstate.com/bonchie/2025/11/18/thomas-massies-latest-epstein-files-claim-is-too-cute-by-half-n2196309 In reality, Massie is inoculating the public against the next very likely argument: "we have brought charges against [name the Democrat], and many of these files are investigate files that are being used in an ongoing federal prosecution, and therefore they cannot be released." 1 1 1
teef Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 19 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Growing up, Vietnamese immigrants were eating all the turtles in the neighborhood lake. They got in trouble by the HOA. Then they stopped killing the turtles and then started eating the fish....it was a catch and release lake and they fished all the fish out of there. They were renters and were evicted. Of course as kids, we all hated them because we didn't have lake to fish in anymore because the HOA never restocked it. lol! this is amazing. there was a story out of syracuse year ago where some kids killed and ate some local, beloved swan family that lived at a park. if i remember correctly, there was no actual law against killing and eating the swans. i might have this very wrong, but it amuses me like the turtle story does. 21 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Can you point to a single post from anyone, just one, in which the poster claims they don’t want the files released or even hints at that? I suspect you can’t, in which case your post above is complete horseshit. You were talking to one with this reply. He believes boys can become girls. Go figure. you were waiting to pounce weren't you! i think that poster can handle himself. no one needs you. 1
JDHillFan Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 8 minutes ago, teef said: lol! this is amazing. there was a story out of syracuse year ago where some kids killed and ate some local, beloved swan family that lived at a park. if i remember correctly, there was no actual law against killing and eating the swans. i might have this very wrong, but it amuses me like the turtle story does. you were waiting to pounce weren't you! i think that poster can handle himself. no one needs you. All you had to do was say “ no I can’t back up what I said”. 1
teef Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 6 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: All you had to do was say “ no I can’t back up what I said”. honestly...how lonely are you? on a scale from 1 to 10. 1 being not lonely at all, and 10 being i'm wildly concerned about trans people. 1 2
JDHillFan Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, teef said: honestly...how lonely are you? on a scale from 1 to 10. 1 being not lonely at all, and 10 being i'm wildly concerned about trans people. Yesterday you justified your increased posting as it being a form of entertainment. Apparently anyone else taking part in that way is just lonely. That’s an interesting perspective you have.
teef Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, JDHillFan said: Yesterday you justified your increased posting as it being a form of entertainment. Apparently anyone else taking part in that way is just lonely. That’s an interesting perspective you have. how red is your face right now?
The Frankish Reich Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Trump just had one of his weird post-Head of State chats with MBS/Saudi. And lashed out at the inevitable Epstein questioner, thereby assuring that the only thing people will remember from this latest Brown Nose the Dictator session is "Epstein." 1 1
JDHillFan Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Just now, teef said: how red is your face right now? So red! Again, all you had to do was say “I can’t back up my statement”. Would have made you seem mildly credible. Instead, you’re going this route. You definitely come off as younger than 48. Sigh.
teef Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 5 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: So red! Again, all you had to do was say “I can’t back up my statement”. Would have made you seem mildly credible. Instead, you’re going this route. You definitely come off as younger than 48. Sigh. are you breathing heavy too? maybe a bit of sweat on your brow just waiting on the next response? you...need...this. also, @Wolfgang is making fun of you. Edited 4 hours ago by teef 1
nedboy7 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago I think Meghan Kelly is already trying to make MAGA understand that if a girl is 15 that is not real pedophilia. There is an age limit to real pedophilia. We are going to find out what that age is after they release the files. She implied, in conversation with NewsNation host Batya Ungar-Sargon, that it wasn’t quite fair to call Jeffrey Epstein a pedophile because he was “into the barely legal type” of minors—which Kelly appallingly defines as “like, 15-year-olds”—who look like they could be legal adults. Epstein was charged with sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors, and the Department of Justice said he abused and exploited dozens of underage girls, some as young as 14. But Kelly said she nonetheless questioned how to characterize Epstein because, she claims, she knows “somebody very, very close to this case who is in a position to know virtually everything,” and “this person has told me from the start, years and years ago, that Jeffrey Epstein, in this person’s view, was not a pedophile.” Kelly continued: “This is this person’s view, who was there for a lot of this, but that he was into the barely legal type. Like, he liked 15-year-old girls. And I realize this is disgusting. I’m definitely not trying to make an excuse for this. I’m just giving you facts, that he wasn’t into, like, 8-year-olds. But he liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were, but would look legal to a passerby.” Kelly said the characterization from her unnamed source—that Epstein was “not a pedophile”—”is what I believed…until we heard from [Attorney General] Pam Bondi that they had tens of thousands of videos of alleged…child sexual abuse material on his computer that for the first time, I thought, ‘Oh, no, he was an actual pedophile.’ I mean, only a pedophile gets off on young children abuse videos. [Bondi has] never clarified it, I don’t know whether it’s true. I have to be honest, I don’t really trust Pam Bondi’s word on the Epstein matters anymore.” 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 31 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: I think Meghan Kelly is already trying to make MAGA understand that if a girl is 15 that is not real pedophilia. There is an age limit to real pedophilia. We are going to find out what that age is after they release the files. She implied, in conversation with NewsNation host Batya Ungar-Sargon, that it wasn’t quite fair to call Jeffrey Epstein a pedophile because he was “into the barely legal type” of minors—which Kelly appallingly defines as “like, 15-year-olds”—who look like they could be legal adults. Epstein was charged with sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors, and the Department of Justice said he abused and exploited dozens of underage girls, some as young as 14. But Kelly said she nonetheless questioned how to characterize Epstein because, she claims, she knows “somebody very, very close to this case who is in a position to know virtually everything,” and “this person has told me from the start, years and years ago, that Jeffrey Epstein, in this person’s view, was not a pedophile.” Kelly continued: “This is this person’s view, who was there for a lot of this, but that he was into the barely legal type. Like, he liked 15-year-old girls. And I realize this is disgusting. I’m definitely not trying to make an excuse for this. I’m just giving you facts, that he wasn’t into, like, 8-year-olds. But he liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were, but would look legal to a passerby.” Kelly said the characterization from her unnamed source—that Epstein was “not a pedophile”—”is what I believed…until we heard from [Attorney General] Pam Bondi that they had tens of thousands of videos of alleged…child sexual abuse material on his computer that for the first time, I thought, ‘Oh, no, he was an actual pedophile.’ I mean, only a pedophile gets off on young children abuse videos. [Bondi has] never clarified it, I don’t know whether it’s true. I have to be honest, I don’t really trust Pam Bondi’s word on the Epstein matters anymore.” Timely newsflash, Jimmy Olsen. I’m working a story on a freighter that was bigger n most that went down on the Great Lake they call Gitche Gummee. Stay tuned. 1
Royale with Cheese Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, teef said: lol! this is amazing. there was a story out of syracuse year ago where some kids killed and ate some local, beloved swan family that lived at a park. if i remember correctly, there was no actual law against killing and eating the swans. i might have this very wrong, but it amuses me like the turtle story does. I bet a swans neck is very tender. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said: Growing up, Vietnamese immigrants were eating all the turtles in the neighborhood lake. They got in trouble by the HOA. Then they stopped killing the turtles and then started eating the fish....it was a catch and release lake and they fished all the fish out of there. They were renters and were evicted. Of course as kids, we all hated them because we didn't have lake to fish in anymore because the HOA never restocked it. They did you all a favor removing the turtles. They eat fish, especially their fry and juveniles and can destroy the habitat quickly. if catch and keep for a short time severely depleted the fish population, it likely wasn't great to start with.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: They did you all a favor removing the turtles. They eat fish, especially their fry and juveniles and can destroy the habitat quickly. if catch and keep for a short time severely depleted the fish population, it likely wasn't great to start with. This is why eating turtles is a good thing. Smh 1
nedboy7 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Timely newsflash, Jimmy Olsen. I’m working a story on a freighter that was bigger n most that went down on the Great Lake they call Gitche Gummee. Stay tuned. Its ok. You can just say you agree with her. Be you. Be MAGA.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 5 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: This is why eating killing turtles is a good thing. Smh fify. they can be beneficial to some degree but in a small lake or pond, they can wreak havoc when present in large numbers. they can be trapped and moved but they often return. "lead poisoning" is the best option.
Royale with Cheese Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: They did you all a favor removing the turtles. They eat fish, especially their fry and juveniles and can destroy the habitat quickly. if catch and keep for a short time severely depleted the fish population, it likely wasn't great to start with. They removed all the fish too! I used to put a cigarette in a bream's mouth and have it inhale the smoke, blow out the gills.
Recommended Posts