Adam Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 LT: Mike Williams LG: Anderson C: Ross Tucker RG: Justin Bannan RT: Chris Villareal this would allow the versatile Teague to be a swing man, backing up at every position, and some tacle eligible plays...should really boost the running game too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fake-Fat Sunny Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 Doubtful as more than half the line would be learning new positions. There is reason to believe that any of these three would master their new role with only a few mistakes over the course of the season (and in an outlandishly positive world, one would look back and have played flawlessly) but there is not likely to be any way that all three would master the new positions. To count to a plan which commits to all 3 suceeding like we want would likely doom us to one ending up being a failure and 2 of them suffering at least one critical mistake over the year. It likely would be a small jump for some (MW has played tackle though on the other side) and a big jump for others (Bannan has never been a starter on O much less at G) but pulling off all of these tasks at the same time seems unlikely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve O Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 LT: Mike WilliamsLG: Anderson C: Ross Tucker RG: Justin Bannan RT: Chris Villareal this would allow the versatile Teague to be a swing man, backing up at every position, and some tacle eligible plays...should really boost the running game too. 294586[/snapback] Do what you want at center and with the left side. Please don't mess with the right side (if it ain't broke, don't fix it!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 LT Gandy LG Anderson C Teague RG Villariel RT Williams just a guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jester43 Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 it will be: lt- teague (lord help us) lg- anderson c- tucker rg- villarreal rt- williams bannan will be a backup. if the bills get shelton he will be the starting lt, but they don't seem to want him very bad. hopefully the bills will draft a left tackle, because i can't see us ever going anywhere with teague as a starter- at any position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frez Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 None of those line-ups look very promising to me. JMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 The Shelton deal will go down Shelton Anderson Teague Villereal Williams &Jason Peters as TE in short yardage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 The Shelton deal will go down Shelton Anderson Teague Villereal Williams &Jason Peters as TE in short yardage 294608[/snapback] I was with you until you put Peters in there. Peters will be a ST player & not see the field at all at TE as he attempts to learn the T position. I still don't get the board's love of a guy who is really nothing more than (potentially) the Mark Pike of the 21st century. He's not a good enough TE & he's too raw at OL-ST are his ticket to the 2005 roster. He'd have no chance of making the team without his special teams play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jester43 Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 None of those line-ups look very promising to me.JMHO 294607[/snapback] agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabattBlue Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 A couple of offensive line scenarios from my perspective.... 1. Shelton is obtained in a trade and Bass or Spencer are there when we pick... LT Shelton LG Anderson OC Teague RG Villarial RT Williams Backups - Gandy, Tucker, (Bass or Spencer), McFarland & (Peters or Bannan) 2. TD tells Arizona where to go and Bass or Spencer are there when we pick... LT Teague LG Anderson OC Bass or Spencer RG Villarial RT Williams Backups - Gandy, Tucker, McFarland, L. Smith & (Peters or Bannan) If Bass or Spencer are gone in both scenarios, Ben Wilkerson or Jason Brown drafted in the 3rd round could be substituted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 it will be: lt- teague (lord help us) lg- anderson c- tucker rg- villarreal rt- williams bannan will be a backup. if the bills get shelton he will be the starting lt, but they don't seem to want him very bad. hopefully the bills will draft a left tackle, because i can't see us ever going anywhere with teague as a starter- at any position. 294606[/snapback] For what it's worth, I agree with your prediction of the staring OL, but I dont think that Bannan will make the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixxxer Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 MM already said in an article (I'll try to find it) that Big Mike will not be moved to LT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenews Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 teague = fina Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frez Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 teague = fina 294755[/snapback] Fina wa pretty decent at LT wasn't he? refresh my memory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarthur31 Posted April 3, 2005 Share Posted April 3, 2005 The Shelton deal will go down Shelton Anderson Teague Villereal Williams &Jason Peters as TE in short yardage 294608[/snapback] This looks like the best configuration so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted April 4, 2005 Share Posted April 4, 2005 Fina wa pretty decent at LT wasn't he? refresh my memory 294758[/snapback] Fina was a decent LT for a while. He was also paid like a superstar, and was flat out awful for his last few seasons on the Bills. When he was cut, he was signed for a very short time with Arizona and promptly released, yet it cost the Bills somewhere between 5-7 mil. to get rid of him as I recall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis Toboggan M.D Posted April 4, 2005 Share Posted April 4, 2005 Teague was a decent LT for a while. He was also paid like a superstar, and was flat out awful for his last few seasons on the Bills. When he was cut, he was signed for a very short time with Arizona and promptly released, yet it cost the Bills somewhere between 5-7 mil. to get rid of him as I recall. 294983[/snapback] Fina you mean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted April 4, 2005 Share Posted April 4, 2005 Fina you mean 294995[/snapback] Absoulutely! Thanks, I will edit that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts