Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
33 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

Even though you are fiercely independent, you declared  Kamala to be an ok candidate in your election post-mortem and you stood tall for The Big Guy post-debate. The only other person alive doing that was Dr Jill. Now you are throwing them both under the bus. Sad!
 

You suck as a political observer. Or perhaps you’re just a hyper-partisan. Either way…

Let me remind you in clear terms:

Mitt Romney vs. Kamala or Joe? I voting for Mitt (as I did in 2012)

Marco Rubio (the 2016 version) vs. Kamala or Joe? Rubio.

Yes, I am a never-Trumper, and I think the reasons for that should be obvious. Anyone who was a Mitt/Rubio Republican c. 2012-2016 should be appalled by the total capitulation of the Republican Party to one weird self-serving dotard.

 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Yes, I am a never-Trumper, and I think the reasons for that should be obvious.

they are forever trumpers for the same reasons we are never trumpers.  they desire the government and society to be turned upside down.  In very real terms, they are radicals and we are conservatives.  We are winners in the current system.  They are losers.  Unfortunately, there are many losers out there.  

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Posted
10 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

they are forever trumpers for the same reasons we are never trumpets.  they desire the government and society to be turned upside down.  In very real terms, they are radicals and we are conservatives.  We are winners in the current system.  They are losers.  Unfortunately, there are many losers out there.  

Posts like this is exactly why the democrat party is underwater.

Posted
Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Poosts like this are exactly why so many magas are losers...

My point remains grammar police.

 

 

Good for you pointing out typos on a message board!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Let me remind you in clear terms:

Mitt Romney vs. Kamala or Joe? I voting for Mitt (as I did in 2012)

Marco Rubio (the 2016 version) vs. Kamala or Joe? Rubio.

Yes, I am a never-Trumper, and I think the reasons for that should be obvious. Anyone who was a Mitt/Rubio Republican c. 2012-2016 should be appalled by the total capitulation of the Republican Party to one weird self-serving dotard.

 

All well and good. Where you permanently lost credibility was letting your never-Trumping lead you to declare Joe Biden as mentally fit, including doing so after the debate. That made you come off as a dotard. A deranged one. All you had to do was say that you would vote for potato over Trump and people would understand. Add that to the fact that your frequent misogynistic and occasional homophobic comments are 100% along political lines and your “fiercely independent” bit comes off as complete horsesh*t. 

Posted
2 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

your frequent misogynistic and occasional homophobic comments

It is not misogynistic to value taste and beauty over the tasteless and tacky.

It is not homophobic to point out the thinly veiled homoeroticism that is inherent in the Cult of Trump, or the self-hating sexual identity that is inherent in supporting someone who would seek to outlaw your own marriage.

Posted
9 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

It is not misogynistic to value taste and beauty over the tasteless and tacky.

It is not homophobic to point out the thinly veiled homoeroticism that is inherent in the Cult of Trump, or the self-hating sexual identity that is inherent in supporting someone who would seek to outlaw your own marriage.

waiting for an NC post of trump as a gladiator, boxer or God.

Posted
29 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

It is not misogynistic to value taste and beauty over the tasteless and tacky.

It is not homophobic to point out the thinly veiled homoeroticism that is inherent in the Cult of Trump, or the self-hating sexual identity that is inherent in supporting someone who would seek to outlaw your own marriage.

Inherent in your comment is that nobody in the LGBTQ2SIA+ community should support the Palestinian cause. That’s just plain weird and ignorant.
 

Get back to me when any of those that offend your delicate sensibilities are on the left side of the political aisle as that has yet to occur. Should be any day now for someone that is “fiercely independent”. 

Posted
1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

Inherent in your comment is that nobody in the LGBTQ2SIA+ community should support the Palestinian cause

Inherent in my comment is that nobody in the LGBT community should support Hamas and the other corrupt and evil mostly self-appointed leaders of the Palestinian cause. That is quite different from supporting the Palestinian cause itself.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Inherent in my comment is that nobody in the LGBT community should support Hamas and the other corrupt and evil mostly self-appointed leaders of the Palestinian cause. That is quite different from supporting the Palestinian cause itself.

So when you call a gay person “self-hating” as in the case of Greenwald, it’s because he supports Hamas, etc? What a load of crap you are trying to peddle. Embarrassing. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

 

 

NO ONE is being put in jail.

 

People are free to say what they want.

 

No ONE is free from the consequences 

×
×
  • Create New...