Deranged Rhino Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 This is what it's about... Who thinks Swalwell is right? A president has every right to fire or hire any ambassador he wishes. He gets to set foreign policy, not the unelected bureaucrats who protect serial pedophiles in their spare time. @Bob in Mich and @Gary Busey think this guy is a champion for truth and reason. That says all you need to know about these asshats. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 7, 2019 Author Share Posted November 7, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: This is what it's about... Who thinks Swalwell is right? A president has every right to fire or hire any ambassador he wishes. He gets to set foreign policy, not the unelected bureaucrats who protect serial pedophiles in their spare time. @Bob in Mich and @Gary Busey think this guy is a champion for truth and reason. That says all you need to know about these asshats. For political reasons, I.e. She wasn't helping Trump cheat on the 2020 election, Swallwell is so obviously correct, I mean Duh! 2 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: Yup! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 He's not, Tibs. POTUS can fire an ambassador for any reason they wish. Including political ones. They work for him, not the other way around. Swalwell has weapons grade idiocy. Be better than Swalwell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 Dems are going Simple Jack. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 1 minute ago, Doc said: Dems are going Simple Jack. A Swalwell/Simple Jack meme would be hilarious -- too bad I suck at making them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: A Swalwell/Simple Jack meme would be hilarious -- too bad I suck at making them. The right can't meme Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 Adam Schiff Calls His First Public Witnesses and It Tells Us Everything Public hearings are finally about to begin in Adam Schiff’s “impeachment inquiry” and he’s called his first three witnesses. Who he’s choosing to march out first tells you everything about the game the Democrats are trying to play. The names? Bill Taylor, Marie Yovanovitch, and George Kent. The problem? Not a single one of these “witnesses” had any direct line to Donald Trump at all. None of them received any order from the President to do anything, by their own admission. Further, nothing in their previous testimony pointed to them having any secondary knowledge of an improper quid pro quo involving Joe Biden. What these witnesses do provide is political fodder. Take Bill Taylor. Despite admitting the only evidence he had for his impressions was an article in The New York Times, he testified that he felt an improper quid pro quo was taking place. In reality, he had nothing to support that except his own gut feeling and he admits that plainly. That’s fine if he wants to go write an opinion piece for some liberal rag. It’s not dispositive of anything in an impeachment case. Former Amb. Marie Yovanovitch is another witness big on flash but low on relevancy. Her only use to Schiff is to proclaim she felt targeted by Trump and that he wanted her out of her position (something well within his power). In her past testimony, she says she had no knowledge of any quid pro quo arrangement, so what is she going to actually add of value? The answer is nothing. As for George Kent, his contribution is to claim he was sidelined from policy altogether, which is apparently impeachable because bureaucrats run the country or something. And that’s really what this continues to boil down to, which is a bunch of bureaucrats mad that Donald Trump actually gets to make his own foreign policy and isn’t subservient to the established order within these agencies. More at the link https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/11/06/adam-schiff-calls-first-public-witnesses-tells-us-everything/ 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 "But it's about defending the constitution!" False. It's about power. Trump has it, they want it. Period. 3 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 is this like seriously happening? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 33 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: omfg! it's Schifty goddamned trial and unless you play by his rules you will not get to play with his ball. what a absolute, complete clown show this has become. the R's should really start to adopt a different approach here. they should simply ignore what the Donner's are doing in their star chamber. let them do whatever the ***** hell they want because they are going to do it anyways. let them show the people what they are and when the articles of impeachment are referred to the Senate, then we can have a real trial and show the American public just how dubious these ***** are. can you imagine House impeachment proceedings with no R's. you might say that that would not be a good thing. my contention would be that the ***** show would be short because they would wrap things up rather fast then we could get to actual truth that much quicker and hang the traitors. and i do mean hang the traitors. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 8, 2019 Share Posted November 8, 2019 6 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: A Swalwell/Simple Jack meme would be hilarious -- too bad I suck at making them. Never go full Swallwell. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 8, 2019 Share Posted November 8, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 8, 2019 Share Posted November 8, 2019 Next week is going to be ugly. Mueller's performance type of ugly. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 8, 2019 Share Posted November 8, 2019 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts