Tiberius Posted September 30, 2019 Author Share Posted September 30, 2019 On 9/28/2019 at 3:17 PM, Joe in Winslow said: So, when they destroy the republic, what will your principles be worth? Who is looking for foreign support to interfere in our election process? It's Trump Democrats have no choice, Trump is trying to steal another election and Democrats have to try and stop that. It's the republican thing to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 16 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Who is looking for foreign support to interfere in our election process? It's Trump Democrats have no choice, Trump is trying to steal another election and Democrats have to try and stop that. It's the republican thing to do. We went on a national dumpster dive looking for high school gossip about Judge Kavanaugh. We can’t ask any questions about Qui Pro Joe? Curious don’t you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 30, 2019 Author Share Posted September 30, 2019 5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: We went on a national dumpster dive looking for high school gossip about Judge Kavanaugh. We can’t ask any questions about Qui Pro Joe? Curious don’t you think? Trump is subverting the republic, inviting foreign influence in our government and willing to extort them to do it. Criminal prez. Protect our election process from foreign influence! Defend the USA!! USA USA USA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Trump is subverting the republic, inviting foreign influence in our government and willing to extort them to do it It’s early and I can read the sarcasm in your comments but this is not extortion nor is it using a foreign government to influence our government...or election. Trump is doing his job. Unlike the Left he’s not supposed to pick and choose which laws to enforce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 30, 2019 Author Share Posted September 30, 2019 32 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: It’s early and I can read the sarcasm in your comments but this is not extortion nor is it using a foreign government to influence our government...or election. Trump is doing his job. Unlike the Left he’s not supposed to pick and choose which laws to enforce. His job is not to pressure foreign leaders to smear his political opponents. You should move to Russia and take the rest of the unAmerican crap with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Trump is blah blah blah. Wow, that would be really serious... if it had any basis in reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 30, 2019 Author Share Posted September 30, 2019 13 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Wow, that would be really serious... if it had any basis in reality. Reality? What's that got to do with Trump supporters? He was extorting a foreign leader to corrupt our election process. Protect American democracy! USA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 HAHA Gator, out to a fast start this Monday. Sybil, 3rd Chair and Transplant are falling behind in the race for this week's Dumber Than Schiff Award. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 54 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Yeah, except for all the evidence that disproves the 'extortion' bullschiff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 30, 2019 Author Share Posted September 30, 2019 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: Yeah, except for all the evidence that disproves the 'extortion' bullschiff. In the non-reality based community, I am sure you are right. What evidence are you talking about? What is exculpatory, in your opinion? Make our election in 2020 safe! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 HAHA Gator, the Dumber Than Schiff Award is for the whole week. Pace yourself, and be aware of the hearsay trap 3rd chair is setting for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 7 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You mean besides the transcript that showed that it didn't happen? Oh wait, we have Schiff's "parody" transcript that conclusively shows Trump should be impeached. I'm sure all his other conclusive evidence of the Ukraine thing, along with all his promised conclusive evidence of the Russia thing, will tip the scales and show that the Democraps finally have him *this* time! Here's some rhetorical questions for you: Why do the Democrats have to consistently lie about the evidence and change the House rules to hide what they're doing, if there's such overwhelming evidence of Trump's guilt? Why did the whistleblower rules have to be changed just in time for this "complaint" to be filed? Why is Bud Light considered more than piss water? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 30, 2019 Author Share Posted September 30, 2019 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: You mean besides the transcript that showed that it didn't happen? Oh wait, we have Schiff's "parody" transcript that conclusively shows Trump should be impeached. I'm sure all his other conclusive evidence of the Ukraine thing, along with all his promised conclusive evidence of the Russia thing, will tip the scales and show that the Democraps finally have him *this* time! Here's some rhetorical questions for you: Why do the Democrats have to consistently lie about the evidence and change the House rules to hide what they're doing, if there's such overwhelming evidence of Trump's guilt? Why did the whistleblower rules have to be changed just in time for this "complaint" to be filed? Why is Bud Light considered more than piss water? How do the transcripts show exculpatory evidence? What part are you talking about? I see Trump asked for a favor right after the Uk Prez asked why his defense weapons were not being delivered as Congress had approved. <-----Crime Trump wants to steal the 2020 election. He's trying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: How do the transcripts show exculpatory evidence? What part are you talking about? I see Trump asked for a favor right after the Uk Prez asked why his defense weapons were not being delivered as Congress had approved. <-----Crime Trump wants to steal the 2020 election. He's trying Can you show in the transcript where Zerensky asked why the money was not distributed? I mean in the actual transcript, not in Schiff's SNL audition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 30, 2019 Author Share Posted September 30, 2019 4 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Can you show in the transcript where Zerensky asked why the money was not distributed? I mean in the actual transcript, not in Schiff's SNL audition. https://games-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/default/documents/d2311f4f-a767-4ddc-868b-8bc9af8226c5/note/339b784b-719c-464f-9eda-85daede53092.pdf#page=1 Right at the bottom of page two he asks about the Javelins and Trump immediately jumps to investigations and calls to Barr and Rudy. "I would like you to do us a favor" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: https://games-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/default/documents/d2311f4f-a767-4ddc-868b-8bc9af8226c5/note/339b784b-719c-464f-9eda-85daede53092.pdf#page=1 Right at the bottom of page two he asks about the Javelins and Trump immediately jumps to investigations and calls to Barr and Rudy. "I would like you to do us a favor" You are misrepresenting the transcript. Show it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: https://games-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/default/documents/d2311f4f-a767-4ddc-868b-8bc9af8226c5/note/339b784b-719c-464f-9eda-85daede53092.pdf#page=1 Right at the bottom of page two he asks about the Javelins and Trump immediately jumps to investigations and calls to Barr and Rudy. "I would like you to do us a favor" "Asks about the Javelins?" He states that the Ukraine is "almost ready to buy more Javelins." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: "Asks about the Javelins?" He states that the Ukraine is "almost ready to buy more Javelins." Normally I'd ask you to flip for the Whack-a-Mole but I've got to prepare for an appointment. He's all yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 30, 2019 Author Share Posted September 30, 2019 3 minutes ago, DC Tom said: "Asks about the Javelins?" He states that the Ukraine is "almost ready to buy more Javelins." And then Trump jumps right to "I need a favor" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 A Politically Motivated Impeachment Is No Laughing Matter by Frank Miele Original Article Why do otherwise smart people say that impeachment has nothing to do with crimes but is rather a brute political calculation? As one example out of many, Kimberley Strassel of the Wall Street Journal said Wednesday on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” that Congress “could impeach the president for laughing the wrong way. They can impeach for anything they want.”Well, actually, no they can’t. Not unless they pass a law first that says “laughing the wrong way” is either a high crime or a misdemeanor. Assuming that “high” is not an early constitutional reference to cannabis, then laughing is unlikely to be a crime of any sort, yet our pesky Constitution........... More at the link: . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts