Jump to content

South Africa Continues Towards Genocide Unabated


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Paulus said:

Life, Liberty, and Property. 

 

Yeah, they are all 3 important to only silly people... 

 

How dare I equate them to each other!!!!

giphy-16.gif

 

You didn't equate them. You went to an asinine example of "genocide". A really bad use of reductio ad absurdum is the tool of morons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Paulus said:

You're doing an even poorer job arguing the superior position.

 

The first guy screaming "Nazi." Sad.

 

You should try and play devil's ad, Tom. Maybe, all the mental master bait'n will pay off with a coherent argument that is both sound and valid, as you seem to be having a hard time squeezing them both in there.

 

"Babies cannot be murdered because they have no concept of murder."  !@#$ing pseudo-philosophy bs.

 

 

 

I would say they are justified in the attempt. Not, that I'd be okay with it. 

And, you said absolutely nothing with all those words... Impressive.

 

I'm not arguing any superior position.  I'm deconstructing yours, as an explicitly Nazi concept of racial ties to the land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Yes, of course murder and genocide is the exact same thing as forcible removal from your land. Clearly there is little to no difference between property rights (or the lack thereof) and murdering people. I can't possibly think of any reason why I would have ever been so silly to never consider murder and property rights on the same level. You're devil's advocate schtick has made me seen the light.

 

Let's not forget that American engages in genocide against African-Americans.

 

We can apparently just redefine "genocide" as whatever the !@#$ we want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Koko78 said:

 

You didn't equate them. You went to an asinine example of "genocide". A really bad use of reductio ad absurdum is the tool of morons.

Haha, keep wiggling yourself into a deeper pit of ridiculousness. The argument was because the blacks had no concept of land ownership they didn't own the land.

 

I simply disagree, as the European concept of ownership does not mean that their land was forfeit. Life and property are both important, and comparing one to the other, in this context, is not absurd. Again, "Life, Liberty, and Property." I blame someone else for putting those 3 things together, maybe you know better.

 

 

Let me kick you off your land that provides you sustenance, and tell you it's okay because my definition of ownership makes it okay. You see why the Founding Fathers believed they were all highly important, yet distinguishable. I am amazed at how some of you guys defend to first genocide and are morally outraged by this possible retaliation genocide. 

 

giphy.gif

Edited by Paulus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/17/2018 at 9:58 AM, TakeYouToTasker said:

Pushing ahead with the plans to amend their Constitution to permit the government to seize the land of white farmers and business people without compensation.

 

 

 

sure explains why faggot Obama is over there a lot race baiting his treasonous kleptocratic rear off.

 

Where whites are "getting it," BIGOT Obama is happy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look towards Zimbabwe. I'm sure SA won't return to slavery, tyranny, and eventually the stone age.

 

What is best for the rest of the world?

 

https://qz.com/africa/1152276/zimbabwes-white-farmers-kicked-out-by-mugabe-will-be-compensated-by-mnangagwa/

 

I wonder if they paid in Zimbabwean dollars, hahahaha. 

Edited by Paulus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Paulus said:

Haha, keep wiggling yourself into a deeper pit of ridiculousness. The argument was because the blacks had no concept of land ownership they didn't own the land.

 

I simply disagree, as the European concept of ownership does not mean that their land was forfeit. Life and property are both important, and comparing one to the other, in this context, is not absurd. Again, "Life, Liberty, and Property." I blame someone else for putting those 3 things together, maybe you know better.

 

 

Let me kick you off your land that provides you sustenance, and tell you it's okay because my definition of ownership makes it okay. You see why the Founding Fathers believed they were all highly important, yet distinguishable. I am amazed at how some of you guys defend to first genocide and are morally outraged by this possible retaliation genocide. 

 

giphy.gif

 

So now you're taking Western European property ideas, mixing it with Nazi concepts of  Blut und Boden, and now mindlessly adding in the American system?

 

Can you at least keep this stupidity consistent?

Edited by Koko78
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, #34fan said:

 

Where are the f___king figures to back this complete bullsh_t argument?

 

How many white farmers have been killed in this so-called genocide, as opposed to say, common violent crime?

 

Whites in South Africa make up 8% of the population, yet own 72% of the land... If I were a scumbag looking for someone to rob, and take advantage of,

 

I know who I'd pick...

 

 

 

I'm not making an argument. I asked you a question, twice.  You said that what's going on in South Africa isn't the same as what happened in Yugoslavia.  Why is better that fewer people are killed for the same reason?

 

If you don't want to answer that, then maybe you'll answer this:  why don't Black South Africans also attack Black South African farmers and take their land, too?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

I'm not making an argument. I asked you a question, twice.  You said that what's going on in South Africa isn't the same as what happened in Yugoslavia.  Why is better that fewer people are killed for the same reason?

 

Your question is preposterous, and infers something I never suggested... None of you fake Afrikaners have shown me stat 1 from this so-called genocide.

 

How many have died?  -Where are the mass graves of Boers butchered by their neighbors?  You guys are the ones trying to sell this genocide... Well.... -Where is it?

 

13 minutes ago, snafu said:

If you don't want to answer that, then maybe you'll answer this:  why don't Black South Africans also attack Black South African farmers and take their land, too?

 

Where's your proof that any  white South African has been attacked and had their land seized?  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how this became a "let's make excuses for genocide" thread.

 

I mean, never mind the fact that the white landowners in South Africa today aren't the originators of apartheid, but rather ended it, empowering the black community there.  

 

Let's justify genocide today because of the actions of different people, decades ago.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

I love how this became a "let's make excuses for genocide" thread.

   

 

It should become a "what genocide are you f___king talking about", thread... 

 

Note to the OP... White people being uncomfortable does not constitute genocide. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, #34fan said:

 

It should become a "what genocide are you f___king talking about", thread... 

 

Note to the OP... White people being uncomfortable does not constitute genocide. :lol:

 

Interesting...considering that African-Americans being uncomfortable is labelled genocide...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, #34fan said:

 

Your question is preposterous, and infers something I never suggested... None of you fake Afrikaners have shown me stat 1 from this so-called genocide.

 

How many have died?  -Where are the mass graves of Boers butchered by their neighbors?  You guys are the ones trying to sell this genocide... Well.... -Where is it?

 

 

Where's your proof that any  white South African has been attacked and had their land seized?  

 

 

I never used the word genocide, fool.  You keep throwing that word around. You keep mentioning mass graves. 

I'm just trying to point out to you that it is irrelevant how many people are turned out of their homes and land with the pretext being their ethnicity.  It is wrong by any number and it is wrong in any location.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

African-Americans being uncomfortable is labelled genocide...

 

Only by your douchebag, counterparts, Tom.

 

33 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

I never used the word genocide, fool.  You keep throwing that word around. You keep mentioning mass graves. 

 

Fine... Show me evidence of Serb-like ethnic cleansing of whites in South Africa, sh_tbag?   -You drew the comparison, not me.

 

And before you deny saying it, -it's all right here:

 

8 hours ago, snafu said:

 

So, ethnic cleansing and/or using race as a motive in moving residents out of a particular area is dependent on population density?

Lots of land populated by few farmers is okay to take, but gunning down thousands in a city is bad?

 

7 hours ago, snafu said:

 

Yeah, that's how the Serbs justified it, too.  https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/how-a-war-criminal-justifies-ethnic-cleansing/

So what's the difference?

 

I'm waiting....

 

Edited by #34fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

I love how this became a "let's make excuses for genocide" thread.

 

I mean, never mind the fact that the white landowners in South Africa today aren't the originators of apartheid, but rather ended it, empowering the black community there.  

 

Let's justify genocide today because of the actions of different people, decades ago.

 

 

 

It's also put a new spin on the term "echo chamber", among other things.

 

I'll admit, I've had to do a fair amount of reading up on the history of the various peoples of that whole region just to get some kind of perspective. Regardless of the history of both slavery and apartheid, I don't see how forcibly removing people from their property and confiscating their wealth is justifiable under the circumstances, and Malema's "We have not called for the killing of white people, at least for now" should wake a lot of people up as to the severity of what appears about to happen in SA.

 

I can't think of any other time in my life when there's been a possibility of a wave of English-speaking, white refugees flooding anyone's borders.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...