3rdnlng Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 2 minutes ago, LA Grant said: It sounds like you pissed yourself which yeah is not a good sign. Hopefully you had an adult diaper or those pants might be ruined. On further inspection it was a wet dream, all because you said you were leaving. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LA Grant Posted February 24, 2018 Author Share Posted February 24, 2018 (edited) Just now, 3rdnlng said: On further inspection it was a wet dream, all because you said you were leaving. ...You're... welcome... ? Congrats on the cum. Edited February 24, 2018 by LA Grant 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, LA Grant said: I'd like to see fewer mass shootings. You don't want to be inconvenienced. Let me know how stricter gun laws gets weapons off the street. Let me know how stricter gun laws stop gun violence in Chicago. Also freedom isn't an inconvenience. The American Revolution was not an inconvenience. Communist. Edited February 24, 2018 by jmc12290 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 3 minutes ago, LA Grant said: I'd like to see fewer mass shootings. You don't want to be inconvenienced. Wouldn't we all. But because people don't fall in lock-step with your ideas and have different approaches you ridicule them and call them pedophiles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LA Grant Posted February 24, 2018 Author Share Posted February 24, 2018 1 minute ago, jmc12290 said: Let me know how stricter gun laws gets weapons off the street. Let me know how stricter gun laws stop gun violence in Chicago. https://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp http://www.pewresearch.org/topics/gun-control/ https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/09/gun-control https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/4/16418754/gun-control-washington-post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 2 minutes ago, LA Grant said: https://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp http://www.pewresearch.org/topics/gun-control/ https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/09/gun-control https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/4/16418754/gun-control-washington-post Not sure what the first link proves. Ditto on the second. Third article is a useless comparison between the USA and England. Fourth article states there's a positive correlation between guns and gun deaths. Okay. There's a positive correlation between cars and car deaths. None of those provide solutions. Try again. Freedom is not an inconvenience to me, communist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LA Grant Posted February 24, 2018 Author Share Posted February 24, 2018 Just now, 3rdnlng said: Wouldn't we all. But because people don't fall in lock-step with your ideas and have different approaches you ridicule them and call them pedophiles. Didn't say Tasker was a pedophile. Just that, as his argument supports the necessity of mass shooters for 2A, it also supports the necessity of pedophiles for 1A. On the other hand, your previous post did say that one of my posts made you literally cream in your jeans. If someone said that to you or your wife or child, even though it was just a failed joke, what would you label that? Because I don't know what other word there is for that but pervert. Do you think that telling a stranger that their post made you involuntarily orgasm is not perverted? Then I guess it would be fair to call you a pervert, no? Just based on your actions in the last 5 minutes? In conclusion, Tasker is not a pedophile, his argument just strongly supports their freedom to own child pornography provided they did not make it. And 3rdnIng is either the world's worst joke teller, and/or a pervert with clear sexual predator tendencies. This is just based on your posts in this thread. Who knows how much worse you are outside of it. But you can keep going, if you like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 12 pages of Grant blathering emotionally about wanting to stop shootings... Yet he hasn't said boo about the fact the school system, local politicians, and sheriffs office allowed this to happen by selling out the kids for federal dollars. 39 times they were warned, yet did nothing. 4 officers outside the building as the shooting happened, yet they did nothing. Since he he is only outraged about guns, it shows us that he doesn't really care about saving kids or stopping murder. Just getting the guns. Its a shallow argument devoid of reason and made for completely partisan reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 3 minutes ago, LA Grant said: Didn't say Tasker was a pedophile. Just that, as his argument supports the necessity of mass shooters for 2A, it also supports the necessity of pedophiles for 1A. On the other hand, your previous post did say that one of my posts made you literally cream in your jeans. If someone said that to you or your wife or child, even though it was just a failed joke, what would you label that? Because I don't know what other word there is for that but pervert. Do you think that telling a stranger that their post made you involuntarily orgasm is not perverted? Then I guess it would be fair to call you a pervert, no? Just based on your actions in the last 5 minutes? In conclusion, Tasker is not a pedophile, his argument just strongly supports their freedom to own child pornography provided they did not make it. And 3rdnIng is either the world's worst joke teller, and/or a pervert with clear sexual predator tendencies. This is just based on your posts in this thread. Who knows how much worse you are outside of it. But you can keep going, if you like. You came to a (somewhat) rough and tumble site with your piss and vinegar attitude but lacking any real intelligence and when you can't stand the heat you try to change the subject. At some point in time people get tired of little weasels that spout out a continuous stream of gibberish. Just go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LA Grant Posted February 24, 2018 Author Share Posted February 24, 2018 5 minutes ago, jmc12290 said: Not sure what the first link proves. Ditto on the second. Third article is a useless comparison between the USA and England. Fourth article states there's a positive correlation between guns and gun deaths. Okay. There's a positive correlation between cars and car deaths. None of those provide solutions. Try again. Freedom is not an inconvenience to me, communist. The majority of Americans support stronger gun control. You want to prevent the majority because of your niche interests and a flawed understanding of our society and the world we inhabit. It's not up for debate. The whole point of this thread is that there is no debate, not a logical one. Every accusal from the right always ends up being a confused confession. The weirdo hardcore right anti-gay guys always end up being closeted homosexuals or with Roy Moore literally pedophiles. The right loves to pretend that the gun-control argument is "emotional" without awareness that their entire argument is based on emotion. They like the feelings of comfort a gun provides. As I said before, I don't even want to outlaw the AR-15 necessarily, I understand the argument of why its popular, I just want to make it harder to get. Of course then the question is why stop at AR-15? Why can't I own a grenade launcher? Why is that not an arm I can bear? Why can't I have a landmine on my front lawn to prevent burglars from trying to steal my grenade launcher? I need it for hunting and to protect my family from a potentially tyrannical government. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/20/voters-support-tougher-gun-control-after-florida-shooting-quinnipiac-poll.html https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/11/gun-control-vegas-polls-243647 https://morningconsult.com/2017/10/11/republican-support-gun-control-growing-polling-shows/ https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/13/16468902/gun-control-politics-intensity It's not really even up for debate, not any kind of honest debate. There is no counter-argument anymore. The debate is over, and it has been. The question is not "should it change." The question is when is it going to change, and who is preventing it and why? By the way, your argument — "Guns are never the problem & we cannot/should not change gun laws or policy in any way" — includes preventing research into gun violence, repeatedly blocked by the NRA, preventing even clearer evidence. Tasker literally plaigarized Wayne LaPierre as part of his argument. Even the most hack political cartoonists would think that would be a way too on-the-nose version of "the NRA controls you like puppets" except there was no irony or self-awareness in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 23 minutes ago, LA Grant said: The majority of Americans support stronger gun control. You want to prevent the majority because of your niche interests and a flawed understanding of our society and the world we inhabit. It's not up for debate. The whole point of this thread is that there is no debate, not a logical one. Every accusal from the right always ends up being a confused confession. The weirdo hardcore right anti-gay guys always end up being closeted homosexuals or with Roy Moore literally pedophiles. The right loves to pretend that the gun-control argument is "emotional" without awareness that their entire argument is based on emotion. They like the feelings of comfort a gun provides. As I said before, I don't even want to outlaw the AR-15 necessarily, I understand the argument of why its popular, I just want to make it harder to get. Of course then the question is why stop at AR-15? Why can't I own a grenade launcher? Why is that not an arm I can bear? Why can't I have a landmine on my front lawn to prevent burglars from trying to steal my grenade launcher? I need it for hunting and to protect my family from a potentially tyrannical government. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/20/voters-support-tougher-gun-control-after-florida-shooting-quinnipiac-poll.html https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/11/gun-control-vegas-polls-243647 https://morningconsult.com/2017/10/11/republican-support-gun-control-growing-polling-shows/ https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/13/16468902/gun-control-politics-intensity It's not really even up for debate, not any kind of honest debate. There is no counter-argument anymore. The debate is over, and it has been. The question is not "should it change." The question is when is it going to change, and who is preventing it and why? By the way, your argument — "Guns are never the problem & we cannot/should not change gun laws or policy in any way" — includes preventing research into gun violence, repeatedly blocked by the NRA, preventing even clearer evidence. Tasker literally plaigarized Wayne LaPierre as part of his argument. Even the most hack political cartoonists would think that would be a way too on-the-nose version of "the NRA controls you like puppets" except there was no irony or self-awareness in it. Then they can vote on revoking the Second Amendment. But until then, shall not be infringed. Freedom is not a nice interest. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 16 minutes ago, jmc12290 said: Then they can vote on revoking the Second Amendment. But until then, shall not be infringed. Freedom is not a nice interest. some might say that the SAFE act is an infringement. after they take away your guns, what's next, baseball bats? knives, forks , then spoons? what the hell r u going to eat with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 (edited) 59 minutes ago, LA Grant said: The majority of Americans support stronger gun control. You want to prevent the majority because of your niche interests and a flawed understanding of our society and the world we inhabit. It's not up for debate. The whole point of this thread is that there is no debate, not a logical one. Every accusal from the right always ends up being a confused confession. The weirdo hardcore right anti-gay guys always end up being closeted homosexuals or with Roy Moore literally pedophiles. The right loves to pretend that the gun-control argument is "emotional" without awareness that their entire argument is based on emotion. They like the feelings of comfort a gun provides. As I said before, I don't even want to outlaw the AR-15 necessarily, I understand the argument of why its popular, I just want to make it harder to get. Of course then the question is why stop at AR-15? Why can't I own a grenade launcher? Why is that not an arm I can bear? Why can't I have a landmine on my front lawn to prevent burglars from trying to steal my grenade launcher? I need it for hunting and to protect my family from a potentially tyrannical government. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/20/voters-support-tougher-gun-control-after-florida-shooting-quinnipiac-poll.html https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/11/gun-control-vegas-polls-243647 https://morningconsult.com/2017/10/11/republican-support-gun-control-growing-polling-shows/ https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/13/16468902/gun-control-politics-intensity It's not really even up for debate, not any kind of honest debate. There is no counter-argument anymore. The debate is over, and it has been. The question is not "should it change." The question is when is it going to change, and who is preventing it and why? By the way, your argument — "Guns are never the problem & we cannot/should not change gun laws or policy in any way" — includes preventing research into gun violence, repeatedly blocked by the NRA, preventing even clearer evidence. Tasker literally plaigarized Wayne LaPierre as part of his argument. Even the most hack political cartoonists would think that would be a way too on-the-nose version of "the NRA controls you like puppets" except there was no irony or self-awareness in it. You realize, twatwaffle, that not all people who oppose gun control own guns, right? Prohibition literally never works. See: alcohol and drugs. Edited February 24, 2018 by joesixpack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 18 minutes ago, joesixpack said: You realize, twatwaffle, that not all people who oppose gun control own guns, right? Prohibition literally never works. See: alcohol and drugs. Right here. I’m one of them. I don’t own one. I hate them and I still support the 2A. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 14 minutes ago, Justice said: Right here. I’m one of them. I don’t own one. I hate them and I still support the 2A. Im the same. As a soldier I fired enough weapons for a lifetime. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 1 hour ago, LA Grant said: The majority of Americans support stronger gun control. You want to prevent the majority because of your niche interests and a flawed understanding of our society and the world we inhabit. It's not up for debate. The whole point of this thread is that there is no debate, not a logical one. Every accusal from the right always ends up being a confused confession. The weirdo hardcore right anti-gay guys always end up being closeted homosexuals or with Roy Moore literally pedophiles. The right loves to pretend that the gun-control argument is "emotional" without awareness that their entire argument is based on emotion. They like the feelings of comfort a gun provides. As I said before, I don't even want to outlaw the AR-15 necessarily, I understand the argument of why its popular, I just want to make it harder to get. Of course then the question is why stop at AR-15? Why can't I own a grenade launcher? Why is that not an arm I can bear? Why can't I have a landmine on my front lawn to prevent burglars from trying to steal my grenade launcher? I need it for hunting and to protect my family from a potentially tyrannical government. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/20/voters-support-tougher-gun-control-after-florida-shooting-quinnipiac-poll.html https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/11/gun-control-vegas-polls-243647 https://morningconsult.com/2017/10/11/republican-support-gun-control-growing-polling-shows/ https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/13/16468902/gun-control-politics-intensity It's not really even up for debate, not any kind of honest debate. There is no counter-argument anymore. The debate is over, and it has been. The question is not "should it change." The question is when is it going to change, and who is preventing it and why? By the way, your argument — "Guns are never the problem & we cannot/should not change gun laws or policy in any way" — includes preventing research into gun violence, repeatedly blocked by the NRA, preventing even clearer evidence. Tasker literally plaigarized Wayne LaPierre as part of his argument. Even the most hack political cartoonists would think that would be a way too on-the-nose version of "the NRA controls you like puppets" except there was no irony or self-awareness in it. And now in addition to calling me a pedophile, you're calling me a plagiarist? Sources now, or GTFO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 2 hours ago, LA Grant said: It's not really even up for debate, not any kind of honest debate. There is no counter-argument anymore. The debate is over, and it has been. Bet people over at the Global Warming debate would have fun with you too 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 2 minutes ago, Cinga said: Bet people over at the Global Warming debate would have fun with you too If you define "fun" as listening to an uninformed blowhard attempt to verbally bully everyone else into accepting his opinion as gospel, then yeah, he'd be a riot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 2 hours ago, jmc12290 said: Then they can vote on revoking the Second Amendment. But until then, shall not be infringed. Freedom is not a nice interest. There is no way that you will ever get LA Grant to understand this very simple, basic truth. He consistently says the same, leftwing talking points: Americans want more gun control and they want to make it near impossible to get a gun. You'd think if this were even REMOTELY true, he could get 2A abolished, right? I mean, he posted an article by VOX, for crying out loud. If you can't believe a VOX article, you may as well just in your union card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 31 minutes ago, Azalin said: If you define "fun" as listening to an uninformed blowhard attempt to verbally bully everyone else into accepting his opinion as gospel, then yeah, he'd be a riot. But you don't seem to have a problem when I... ...oh, wait. Uninformed blowhard. Never mind. 2 hours ago, Foxx said: some might say that the SAFE act is an infringement. after they take away your guns, what's next, baseball bats? knives, forks , then spoons? what the hell r u going to eat with? Point of note: England is moving to regulate and even ban the sale and possession of knives - including kitchen knives - because of the epidemic of knife fatalities. So no, it's not a strawman argument. It's an actual, real thing, regulating kitchen cutlery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts