Domdab99 Posted October 24, 2017 Author Share Posted October 24, 2017 (edited) here you go https://www.google.com/search?q=evidence+the+russians+interfered+in+US+election&oq=evidence+the+russians+interfered+in+US+election&aqs=chrome..69i57.9488j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Google is easy. But I'm sure you're going to come back and say "smoking gun." Never mind that over TEN of our intelligence agencies have agreed that it happened. The “three or four” agencies referred to by Mr. Trump are the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the F.B.I. and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, all of which determined that Russia interfered in the election. Their work was compiled into a report, and a declassified version was released on Jan. 6 by the director of national intelligence. It said that all four agencies had “high confidence” that Russian spies had tried to interfere in the election on the orders of President Vladimir V. Putin. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/06/us/politics/trump-russia-intelligence-agencies-cia-fbi-nsa.html This is like people saying Climate Change isn't real because only 98 out 100 Climate scientists say it's real. And i'm done with this. Anything else you're going to want answered will have to come from someone else. Edited October 24, 2017 by Domdab99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 (edited) here you go https://www.google.com/search?q=evidence+the+russians+interfered+in+US+election&oq=evidence+the+russians+interfered+in+US+election&aqs=chrome..69i57.9488j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Google is easy. But I'm sure you're going to come back and say "smoking gun." Never mind that over TEN of our intelligence agencies have agreed that it happened. The “three or four” agencies referred to by Mr. Trump are the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the F.B.I. and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, all of which determined that Russia interfered in the election. Their work was compiled into a report, and a declassified version was released on Jan. 6 by the director of national intelligence. It said that all four agencies had “high confidence” that Russian spies had tried to interfere in the election on the orders of President Vladimir V. Putin. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/06/us/politics/trump-russia-intelligence-agencies-cia-fbi-nsa.html This is like people saying Climate Change isn't real because only 98 out 100 Climate scientists say it's real. And i'm done with this. Anything else you're going to want answered will have to come from someone else. I asked for evidence... and you give me a google link without a hint of irony and then a bunch of reports on the DNI ICA. The ICA is evidence, just not evidence for what you're claiming. It's evidence that Directors Clapper and Brennan committed felonies in the preparation of this document in order to undermine an incoming administration's ability to wage its own foreign policy. That's the real conversation we should be having about this document... but if you want to hold it up as proof that the Russians interfered with our elections you should at least understand what the document actually says: What you provided is the DNI ICA (actually, a second hand report of the ICA) which has been proven to have been compiled in direct violation of USIC protocols and relied primarily upon what's now been forensically proven falsified evidence. The ICA itself actually doesn't even say what you think it does, or what the NYT says it does. It in fact does not confirm the Russians meddled, they speculate it's possible. The NSA is so confident in the ICA's assessment they currently have less than 50% confidence in its central findings. This is the NSA, the one agency of the three who compiled the report who would have evidence of hacking and collusion, and they're less confident in the ICA's findings than they had about WMD in Iraq. It's times like this when it helps to read the source material for yourself before allowing yourself to be spun wildly into a frenzy by a propaganda machine that brought us 17 years of endless war and the most massive surveillance state the world has ever known. You're being had. Edited October 24, 2017 by Deranged Rhino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 Hahahahaha. Dorq is the average !@#$ on Facebook bitxhing about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 (edited) You like a person that basically propagandizes against the left. It's not disagreement, it's just bull sh it he was pushing. Most left leaning people just spot that bull straight away, just saying. You did say we needed the tax cuts because of the hidden unemployment rate, and you don't know anymore than I do that the GOP will pass anything at all on healthcare, and almost nothing can be worse than that turd ball bill "mean" they passed before. What do you lean left on? I don't see the same propaganda tricks with O'Reilly that Hannity and Limbaugh employ (everything wrong in government is the fault of the left and the Rino's). You can disagree with me and that's fine. I never said I supported federal income tax cuts because that means they'll likely reduce funding for social entitlement programs a lot of less fortunate people rely on. I hope you're right and the GOP doesn't successfully repeal the ACA, but I think they eventually will. If they don't, some major changes are needed to fix the ACA and reaching across the aisle to some of the more moderate Republicans input is a good idea. Edited October 24, 2017 by Doc Brown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 What do you lean left about? Seriously, you like O'Reilly, wanted the Trump unhealth care bill, have argued for the GOP tax cut plan, what the heck makes you a lefty? He has flatulence. that's like a more intellectual version of me. you !@#$. fine i'm going to be Levi. You have to spend your apprenticeship in Alaska first. No. If you can't find it on your own, anything I post won't sway you. You have made up your mind already. your name is apt. In other words, if you (DR) can't find something to support your premise then you won't discuss this anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 What the hell did he do that cost him $32 million?? My guess would be her allegation of an 'involuntary sexual relationship'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 What the hell did he do that cost him $32 million?? He became rich and pi$$ed a beyatch off. That's what happens when you're a rich guy in a land of trial lawyers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 He has flatulence. You have to spend your apprenticeship in Alaska first. In other words, if you (DR) can't find something to support your premise then you won't discuss this anymore. have you met that !@#$? He snap chats me anything 69 he can Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 (edited) Sick !@#$ Edited October 25, 2017 by Boyst62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Why is God punishing me and my children? what a loser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts