Jump to content

Relationship between the Confederacy and European Fascism?


dpberr

Recommended Posts

Honest question here -

 

I'm having a hard time figuring out how 1800s United States Confederacy and 1930s European Fascism have any relation to one another.

 

Aren't they pretty much the opposite of one another? Is there any historical or legitimate connection whatsoever between the two?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There might be a few things in common, but there is really nothing huge to tie the Confederacy on to 1930s Facism.

 

That is if you want to think and try to convince anyone else with an IQ over 50.

 

f you want to just mouth off on the internet then you can say whatever you like, but nobody will talk to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have no relation of any sort that I can think of. And I've studied that era of history fairly extensively.

 

National Socialism and the Confederacy have a similarity in agrarianism (including the use of slave labor), but even that's a very superficial similarity - National Socialism did so almost exclusively out of bull **** racial and "noble peasantry" theory, whereas the Confederacy's was born far more from economic necessity of a landed aristocracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have no relation of any sort that I can think of. And I've studied that era of history fairly extensively.

 

National Socialism and the Confederacy have a similarity in agrarianism (including the use of slave labor), but even that's a very superficial similarity - National Socialism did so almost exclusively out of bull **** racial and "noble peasantry" theory, whereas the Confederacy's was born far more from economic necessity of a landed aristocracy.

 

 

No, they were both extreme racists and were not afraid to say so. That's the connection.

 

the economic necessity argument is so lame. Most southern s were not slaveholders but supported white supremacy to the death.

 

And btw, that economic argument of yours basically makes the point that capitalism fuels racism, a Marxist point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When it was over, Lincoln reinstituted those who pledged allegiance to the United States of America.

 

Mussolini was shot and then left in the public square and defecated on and then strung up for a week in the square.


I can't even imagine finding the time to read the bullcrap that Tiberius must be posted here on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When it was over, Lincoln reinstituted those who pledged allegiance to the United States of America.

 

Mussolini was shot and then left in the public square and defecated on and then strung up for a week in the square.I can't even imagine finding the time to read the bullcrap that Tiberius must be posted here on this one.

 

Gosh, people get so angry when you point out racism. Racism in Nazis and Confederates!!! Wow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, they were both extreme racists and were not afraid to say so. That's the connection.

 

the economic necessity argument is so lame. Most southern s were not slaveholders but supported white supremacy to the death.

 

And btw, that economic argument of yours basically makes the point that capitalism fuels racism, a Marxist point

That's not a relation, it's a SIMILARITY. And an extremely shallow one.

 

Oh, !@#$ it. Just shut tbe !@#$ up, ****head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5 June 1934, about a year and half after Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of the Reich, the leading lawyers of Nazi Germany gathered at a meeting to plan what would become the Nuremberg Laws, the centrepiece anti-Jewish legislation of the Nazi race regime.

The meeting was an important one, and a stenographer was present to take down a verbatim transcript, to be preserved by the ever-diligent Nazi bureaucracy as a record of a crucial moment in the creation of the new race regime.

That transcript reveals a startling fact: the meeting involved lengthy discussions of the law of the United States of America. At its very opening, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on US race law and, as the meeting progressed, the participants turned to the US example repeatedly.

They debated whether they should bring Jim Crow segregation to the Third Reich. They engaged in detailed discussion of the statutes from the 30 US states that criminalised racially mixed marriages. They reviewed how the various US states determined who counted as a ‘Negro’ or a ‘Mongol’, and weighed whether they should adopt US techniques in their own approach to determining who counted as a Jew. Throughout the meeting the most ardent supporters of the US model were the most radical Nazis in the room.

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/why-the-nazis-studied-american-race-laws-for-inspiration-2017-2

That's not a relation, it's a SIMILARITY. And an extremely shallow one.

 

Oh, !@#$ it. Just shut tbe !@#$ up, ****head.

Come on, don't get angry and start with insults. This is a great subject that we can discuss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best humor comes from truth. Tibs is deathly allergic to truth, as he continually demonstrates with his posts, hence his humor suffers.

 

 

Oh damn!!! I saw you posted here and was hoping you actually tried contributing to the topic. That would have been fun! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...