Jump to content

The Trump Economy


GG

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 minute ago, row_33 said:

Perception is the key, the President sets the tone, each has his own personality and way of handling conflict, each adjusts to what is required of him at that precise moment 

 

 

But this president is calling himself a genius! Most see him as mentally unstable. He's perceived as a moron and insane, a bigot and ignorant, yet the economy chugs on 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, row_33 said:

And he was seen as better than Hillary by The People when we already knew all this for decades

 

to be honest it is maybe too much irony even for a Canadian

 

No, actually the people went for Hillary. The majority, in fact. Trump was chosen by the EC, not the people

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The electoral college determinzzz the President. I learned this in grade 4 up here in Canada.

 

please don’t enforce unfortunately unfair Canadian views of the horror of American public schools, Tiberius.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, row_33 said:

The electoral college determinzzz the President. I learned this in grade 4 up here in Canada.

 

please don’t enforce unfortunately unfair Canadian views of the horror of American public schools, Tiberius.

 

 

Then don't say the people picked Trump, they didn't 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We, or You The People through the Law of the land elected Trump

 

you need some rewatching of Schoolhouse Rock 

 

is your timestable as bad as your legal foundation?  Look up Mean Old Number Nine....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

No, actually the people went for Hillary. The majority, in fact. Trump was chosen by the EC, not the people

 

No, actually a plurality of the people in a majority of the states voted for Trump. You know, that's kinda how he won the electoral college.

 

There is no such thing as the popular vote. And no, Hillary never won a "majority" of anything.

Edited by Koko78
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

No, actually a plurality of the people in a majority of the states voted for Trump. You know, that's kinda how he won the electoral college.

 

There is no such thing as the popular vote. And no, Hillary never won a "majority" of anything.

Besides, does anyone think that HRC and popular should ever be used in the same sentence?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Koko78 said:

 

No, actually a plurality of the people in a majority of the states voted for Trump. You know, that's kinda how he won the electoral college.

 

There is no such thing as the popular vote. And no, Hillary never won a "majority" of anything.

Yes, the popular vote simply does not exist! Brilliant! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Yes, the popular vote simply does not exist! Brilliant! 

 

Yeah, now if only dipshits like you would actually comprehend it, we'd be off to a good start.

 

However, if you are trying to imply that the popular vote is a thing, just answer me one question: Who is the President of the United States of America?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes the popular vote doesn’t count for anything. Anyone over the age of 8 should understand that with even a middle level of intelligence.

 

 

And one campaigns to the electoral college, completely ignoring long-lost states. Only Hillary was able to think she could ignore key states like Wisconsin because they were in the bag for her already.

 

but you have heard this 500 times and just refuse to learn reality.

 

 

 

Edited by row_33
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote


 

History suggests that the next recession is not far off. The current expansion, though relatively weak, has been steady since June 2009, making this the third-longest upward climb on record. Juiced by the tax cut, the United States is on track to record 107 months without a recession in April, passing the boom of the 1960s in duration. That will leave only the decade-long, 120-month run in the 1990s — when the end of the Cold War met the rise of the Internet to create a Golden Age for the U.S. economy — to be beaten.

 

 

In other words, just when the 2020 election begins to warm up, in spring 2019, the economy (if it isn’t already in recession) will break the existing record and begin testing the outer limits of the cycle. It’s not hard to imagine shocks that could trigger a drop. Democrats could win control of the House and ignite an impeachment crisis. Mueller’s investigation could take an unsettling turn. The Federal Reserve could raise interest rates faster than the economy can digest them. Or the opposite: The Fed could move too slowly and smoldering inflation could catch fire. China’s debt bubble could burst. North Korea could erupt. Or the very real threat, dreaded by Trump’s own economic advisers: The president could deliver on his trade war threats.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-trump-recession-is-coming/2018/01/05/2c5f2142-f23f-11e7-b390-a36dc3fa2842_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-e%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.2f0b3e6d0e89

 

lets face it, they only thing propping this insane scarecrow up is the lasting recovery. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/6/2018 at 3:36 PM, Tiberius said:

Yes, the popular vote simply does not exist! Brilliant! 

It's part of the Federal Government. The part that is invisible... like the Federal Reserve, and the FBI policemen. 

Edited by Nanker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's like shots on goal when goals scored determines the winning team in hockey

 

even a shot that beats the goalie and rings off the post doesn't count as a shot on goal, making the popular vote more worthless

 

amazing how we come closer to a Universal Theory on here every day...  ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...