Jump to content

Matt Moore?


LA Grant

Recommended Posts

Mahomet hasn't declared yet. No guarantee they can draft him if he does. Though he would be a good QB to take a chance on if they could get him.

Ok another Watson

 

Same as TT with upside

 

I dont lose much

 

See i can let TT walk and get similar play elsewhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I've been beating the Matt Moore drum for years, but it might be too late. He'd be an upgrade over Tyrod, but so will most QBs and if we're going to go old, I'd rather go with someone better than Moore.

I liked Moore a lot once upon a time. As a guy in the room with cardale and a rookie I'd be fine with him, and an extra $10m spent elsewhere

 

But I wouldn't be trying to trade for him probably

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I thought I just did explain why he was different. Are crayons and a puppet show needed?

Cool his legs.

 

Still leads the 31st ranked passing offense. Hmmm isnt a QB supposed to be able to pass? Find and hit open WRs?

 

I can find any schlep to hand the ball to McCoy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool. Let's just make a move & go for it. What do we have to loose - another 17th year without making the playoffs?

 

Or we could just keep Taylor and know we'll suck on offense again. That's a better plan, for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been beating the Matt Moore drum for years, but it might be too late. He'd be an upgrade over Tyrod, but so will most QBs and if we're going to go old, I'd rather go with someone better than Moore.

Would he be? You're confident we would be even higher than sixth in the league in scoring next season with Matt Moore at the helm? What are you thinking, maybe second? Third? I like it.

 

Or we could just keep Taylor and know we'll suck on offense again. That's a better plan, for sure.

Wow, sixth in the league in scoring sucks, huh? Edited by metzelaars_lives
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do these posts still happen.

 

I like how our offense played last week. If we'd had Sammy and Woods all season would we be hammering incessantly on Tyrod. An offense needs to have weapons. Even Clay looked good when we had our guys back.

 

I would humbly suggest that the negative energy be focused on players like Gilmore who should be playing elsewhere eating up some other team's salary cap,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would he be? You're confident we would be even higher than fifth in the league in scoring next season with Matt Moore at the helm? What are you thinking, maybe second? Third? I like it.

Wow, fifth in the league in scoring sucks, huh?

 

7-8 sucks.

 

Unless those pretty stats happen when we need them most, they don't mean schit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would he be? You're confident we would be even higher than sixth in the league in scoring next season with Matt Moore at the helm? What are you thinking, maybe second? Third? I like it.

Wow, sixth in the league in scoring sucks, huh?

Bet he is just as confident Moore will be 6th in scoring or higher on offense as you are that Taylor will be as well when Shady is another year older.

 

What is known though as a passer Moore is a better passer and that can offset any loss in Shadys legs if they happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

7-8 sucks.

 

Unless those pretty stats happen when we need them most, they don't mean schit.

Ok got it. See I would argue that in a season when you lose games scoring 25, 25, 25, 31, 24, 24 and 31 points that MAYBE, just maybe, you have a problem on defense but I could be wrong. You seem to know more about this stuff than I do so you're probably my right.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do these posts still happen.

 

I like how our offense played last week. If we'd had Sammy and Woods all season would we be hammering incessantly on Tyrod. An offense needs to have weapons. Even Clay looked good when we had our guys back.

 

I would humbly suggest that the negative energy be focused on players like Gilmore who should be playing elsewhere eating up some other team's salary cap,

Oo focus negative energy on Gilmore who has been FAR MORE productive than Tyrod.

 

See thats the issue you say Gilmore not worth the Money but TT is not worth more than 10M cap hit when you can get similar play from other QBs much cheaper than him.

 

Be consistent anyway

Ok got it. See I would argue that in a season when you lose games scoring 25, 25, 25, 31, 24, 24 and 31 points that MAYBE, just maybe, you have a problem on defense but I could be wrong. You seem to know more about this stuff than I do so you're probably my right.

Man compete a pass in Sea score when you need to thatbwoukd be awesome for Anti Clutch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

7-8 sucks.

 

Unless those pretty stats happen when we need them most, they don't mean schit.

 

I beg to differ. Let me explain, you win by scoring more points that your opponent. Now stay with me here being a top 5 scoring team means something. If you are top 5 you have half the way there, now you need to focus on your defense and make sure they know how to tackle. If you improve the defense, those pretty offensive stats get you a lot of wins. Just sayin..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I beg to differ. Let me explain, you win by scoring more points that your opponent. Now stay with me here being a top 5 scoring team means something. If you are top 5 you have half the way there, now you need to focus on your defense and make sure they know how to tackle. If you improve the defense, those pretty offensive stats get you a lot of wins. Just sayin..

 

http://www.nfl.com/s...=PASSING_SACKED

Sort this by every statistic and see where your wonder boy falls.

Sacked the most in the league.

Between 21st and 25th for almost all other stats.

I don't know what stats you and the rest of your cult make this guy good in your eyes, but the looking at the stats that actually equate to WINNING FOOTBALL GAMES, he is horrible.

Carry on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oo focus negative energy on Gilmore who has been FAR MORE productive than Tyrod.

 

See thats the issue you say Gilmore not worth the Money but TT is not worth more than 10M cap hit when you can get similar play from other QBs much cheaper than him.

 

Be consistent anyway

 

Man compete a pass in Sea score when you need to thatbwoukd be awesome for Anti Clutch

 

Please name the QBs that we can expect similar play from that are available for under 10M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok got it. See I would argue that in a season when you lose games scoring 25, 25, 25, 31, 24, 24 and 31 points that MAYBE, just maybe, you have a problem on defense but I could be wrong. You seem to know more about this stuff than I do so you're probably my right.

 

 

 

I beg to differ. Let me explain, you win by scoring more points that your opponent. Now stay with me here being a top 5 scoring team means something. If you are top 5 you have half the way there, now you need to focus on your defense and make sure they know how to tackle. If you improve the defense, those pretty offensive stats get you a lot of wins. Just sayin..

 

Well done on both attempts at rationalization. However, it's like trying to teach trigonometry to a bunch of neanderthals at times around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...