B-Man Posted September 7 Author Posted September 7 Although the “We Are All D.C.” protest was presented as a grassroots march, it was primarily organized by Free DC, a fiscally sponsored project under Community Change and its political arm, Community Change Action. These are long-established national nonprofits that manage projects and provide infrastructure, meaning the protest wasn’t simply a spontaneous, local effort but part of a larger, professionally coordinated network. The ACLU also partnered in the organizing, bringing additional national resources and visibility. The financial backing for these groups comes heavily from major progressive foundations and donor networks. Between 2020 and 2023, Community Change received over $20 million from sources such as the Open Society Foundations, the Arabella Advisors network, and the Tides Foundation. These funds are pooled and distributed through fiscal sponsorship arrangements, so while they fuel Free DC’s activism—including today’s protest— they are not traceable to individual donors in public filings. This structure raises transparency concerns because U.S. nonprofit law does not require groups like Community Change to disclose donor identities publicly. If any portion of that money originated from foreign donors, it would remain invisible to the public since only the IRS sees detailed donor lists. By routing money through large donor-advised funds and fiscal sponsors, outside funding—including potential foreign contributions— can legally support U.S. protests while appearing to the public as domestic “grassroots” activity. We have no idea how much foreign money was funneled into today’s protest. https://x.com/DefiyantlyFree/status/1964591056718352611 “So, once again, taxpayers are funding protests they do not necessarily agree with. Yay.” 1
JFKjr Posted September 16 Posted September 16 George Floyd and Charlie Kirk were both born on the same day, October 14th. Matching martyrs. 1
B-Man Posted October 8 Author Posted October 8 (edited) DISPATCHES FROM THE BLUE ZONES: 13 arrested, four police officers injured in violent Boston Common protest: ‘Completely despicable.’ Thirteen people were arrested Tuesday night in connection with a pro-Palestinian protest that turned violent on the Boston Common and left four police officers injured, including some with broken bones, according to officials. Protesters “turned on police” at approximately 6:50 p.m. when they began to move from the Common to the area of Tremont and Winter streets, Boston Police said. “At that time, protesters turned on police, kicking a marked cruiser, assaulting officers, blocking traffic, and setting off devices causing red smoke in the air,” Boston Police spokesman Sgt. Det. John Boyle said in a Tuesday night statement. Eight men and five women were placed under arrest. No one had been booked as of shortly before 9 p.m. Four police officers were injured in connection with the incident. Two officers were taken to local hospitals for treatment. Police have preliminary reports of officers with broken bones, but all injuries are considered non-life-threatening, Boyle said. “Another night of violence against police officers in Boston tonight,” said Larry Calderone, president of the Boston Police Patrolmen’s Association. “Our officers were attacked, assaulted and sent to the hospital with injuries. Completely despicable and totally unacceptable. We were outnumbered and understaffed for the event,” he continued. “We need to put more officers out on the street at these events and help protect ourselves from these ruthless attacks. It’s happening far too often lately with no repercussions,” Calderone told the Herald. The protesters appeared to be tied to the pro-Palestinian movement. A flyer distributed ahead of the event urged protesters to “Flood Downtown for Palestine.” The demonstration occurred on the two-year anniversary of the Hamas terror attack on Israel that sparked war in the region. https://www.bostonherald.com/2025/10/07/13-arrested-four-police-officers-injured-in-violent-boston-common-protest-completely-despicable/ Appeared? When people tell you who they are — violently — believe them. Edited October 8 by B-Man
Royale with Cheese Posted Saturday at 06:54 PM Posted Saturday at 06:54 PM 3rd fraud charge in the last two months for BLM.
nedboy7 Posted Saturday at 11:15 PM Posted Saturday at 11:15 PM So triggered. 🤣 4 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said: 3rd fraud charge in the last two months for BLM. you’re a pedo worshipper. Clown.
B-Man Posted Monday at 03:44 PM Author Posted Monday at 03:44 PM "Democrats say the use of silly inflatable costumes is a way to undercut Republican portrayals of such events as violent 'hate America rallies.'" The Washington Post sets out to answer the question "Why protesters against Trump are wearing frog, chicken and T. rex costumes." If you feel you need to put on a costume to disguise what you are, doesn't that suggest that you are the scary thing you're trying to cover up? I think of the wolf in sheep's clothing. The image of wolf in sheep's clothing comes from in the Sermon on the Mount. Jesus said: "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves." From the WaPo article: https://althouse.blogspot.com/2025/10/democrats-say-use-of-silly-inflatable.html#more https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/10/19/inflatable-costumes-trump-protests/?
B-Man Posted yesterday at 02:31 PM Author Posted yesterday at 02:31 PM Good God this reminds me of multiple posters here.
pennstate10 Posted yesterday at 02:37 PM Posted yesterday at 02:37 PM https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115398251623299921 History will look back on this as the ramblings of a deeply disturbed president. It’s not funny, not a joke, simply the batsht crazy actions of a lunatic. 1
JDHillFan Posted yesterday at 02:55 PM Posted yesterday at 02:55 PM 16 minutes ago, pennstate10 said: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115398251623299921 History will look back on this as the ramblings of a deeply disturbed president. It’s not funny, not a joke, simply the batsht crazy actions of a lunatic. Hard to believe your preferred political party sucks so badly that he’s been elected TWICE. Brutal. 1
pennstate10 Posted yesterday at 03:17 PM Posted yesterday at 03:17 PM 18 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Hard to believe your preferred political party sucks so badly that he’s been elected TWICE. Brutal. The ironic thing is that I’m a registered Republican. I voted for George Bush 4 times, and Mitt Romney twice (write in for 2016 as I wouldn’t vote for Trump or Clinton). Im still mystified and disappointed that the party of Bush and Reagan would back an obvious grifter and con man 1
teef Posted yesterday at 03:23 PM Posted yesterday at 03:23 PM 4 minutes ago, pennstate10 said: The ironic thing is that I’m a registered Republican. I voted for George Bush 4 times, and Mitt Romney twice (write in for 2016 as I wouldn’t vote for Trump or Clinton). Im still mystified and disappointed that the party of Bush and Reagan would back an obvious grifter and con man this is going to confuse some people...especially maga. i voted for trump, and just can't believe that his followers eat up any possible excuse he puts out. the man just doesn't have any accountability. all he has to do is scream it was the dems...and all critical thought goes aside.
Recommended Posts