Jump to content

The age old debate...QB vs OL


Recommended Posts

tom cable's zone blocking schemes and marshawn lynch's ability to transform ( like terrel davis and clinton portis did for shanahan) into a fine one-cut power back is what made russell's job simpler - that and pete carroll's adapting some collegiate spread option ideas into his O (see auburn's malzahn).

 

before the league transformed into a 7 on 7 drill to increase offensive touches that could be spread across enough players to satisfy several fantasy league rosters - an O line was the foundation upon which a consistently productive O was built. now, as Marcell's quote points out - the relevance of engaging and holding blocks has become secondary to offensive execution.

 

so, yeah.. grab yourself a spread option athlete who can make all the throws.. while you're at it.. grab a few.. and change Al's old mantra from 'just win, baby' to 'plug and play, baby'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There is a popular myth here that says QBs do everything and the other 10 players mean nothing. There is a reason football uses 11 players and it's called a team. Bill Belichick's famous quote is "do your job" not "you 10 guys just stand there while Brady does all the work."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I believe that Wilson was among the most-sacked QBs in the NFL each of the last 2 seasons, and is there again this year. I agree that he compensates, but my point is simply that he's not really an outlier.

 

The year that Ben and Rodgers met in the Superbowl, each was among the most-sacked QBs in the league.

 

Brady does his line far more favors than they do for him, as I'm sure you know.

 

I'm fine disagreeing, as I'm only trying to say that a good QB can overcome a deficient OL more readily than a good OL can help a deficient QB.

I agree completely with your overall point. I'm just saying that even a good QB will struggle if the line is bad enough.

 

I hesitate to attribute sack numbers to the OL, especially with mobile QBs who run a lot b/c every time they're stopped for a loss it's recorded as a sack, but that's kind of tangential to the conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Dallas has a great OL, 3-8, without or with a hurt Romo, a franchise QB

 

just saying

 

What?

 

Dallas is 3-1 with Romo; 0-7 without him.

 

http://www.nfl.com/player/tonyromo/2505354/gamelogs

 

Same OL.

I agree completely with your overall point. I'm just saying that even a good QB will struggle if the line is bad enough.

 

I hesitate to attribute sack numbers to the OL, especially with mobile QBs who run a lot b/c every time they're stopped for a loss it's recorded as a sack, but that's kind of tangential to the conversation.

 

Indeed...I think we're more on the same page than in disagreement in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's more important?

 

What should you get first?

 

Build a great OL or get a good QB then address the OL?

 

 

 

 

CBF

You need both. I'm not sure it matters in which order you do it. A strong OL would certainly help speed up the learning process for a young/inexperienced QB. So maybe build the strong OL first, but don't pass up on a good QB if one is available before the line is fully built.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This question has never been up for debate. There is only one most important position in all of sports and it is not an offensive lineman.

 

That said, I will once again remind us that building teams has never been a linear process. If you have a chance to snag a blue chip lineman vs. an average QB, you take the blue chipper every time.

 

GO BILLS!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This question has never been up for debate. There is only one most important position in all of sports and it is not an offensive lineman.

 

That said, I will once again remind us that building teams has never been a linear process. If you have a chance to snag a blue chip lineman vs. an average QB, you take the blue chipper every time.

 

GO BILLS!!!

 

This.

Agreed, but why are the Chargers with franchise QB Rivers 3-8 ?

 

Because you need more than just a franchise QB. It is still the ultimate team game even if the QB is by far the most important player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...