What is better, no guns, or more guns?

[Tommy Callahan]

3 hours ago, ALF said:

 

Keeping these guns out of the hands of people just becoming old enough to buy these weapons  who lately are committing these mass murders .

interesting Idea. but most mass murders are squarely in inner cities..  and not by legally owned weapons.

 

https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/reports/mass-shooting

 

Notice every one on this list has local reporting, but almost no national reporting.  

 

 

[Tiberius]

 

[BillStime]

Kids shouldn’t have guns

 

 

[LeviF]

On 12/26/2022 at 4:45 PM, BillStime said:

Kids shouldn’t have guns

 

 

 

This is hilarious.

 

On video we have the young Rittenhouse being attacked during a riot, during said attack he shoots a convicted kiddie diddler, a burglar, and a wife-beater in what a jury found to be entirely lawful self-defense.

 

So Ms. Jen up here (along with you, our Bostonian friend) must be mad about something OTHER than those facts, correct? 

 

We can speculate that perhaps she is mad about the fact that he was there at all. But why? Is she also angry that the above-mentioned felons showed up armed to riot? Apparently not. And let's be real - of the two groups that showed up (rioters and Rittenhouse's ilk), one group was defending local businesses against a major riot and the other, well, wasn't. So even if you want to castigate BOTH groups involved Rittenhouse still isn't the primary villain. 

 

That really leaves us with one option: Jen believes that what the child molester, burglar, and abuser were doing was the right and proper thing. Perhaps they were even acting on behalf of the proper authorities - in which case Kyle Rittenhouse is a criminal because he killed two civil servants in the course of their duties (during an election year!). 

 

Am I above the target yet?

[BillStime]

1 hour ago, LeviF said:

 

This is hilarious.

 

On video we have the young Rittenhouse being attacked during a riot, during said attack he shoots a convicted kiddie diddler, a burglar, and a wife-beater in what a jury found to be entirely lawful self-defense.

 

So Ms. Jen up here (along with you, our Bostonian friend) must be mad about something OTHER than those facts, correct? 

 

We can speculate that perhaps she is mad about the fact that he was there at all. But why? Is she also angry that the above-mentioned felons showed up armed to riot? Apparently not. And let's be real - of the two groups that showed up (rioters and Rittenhouse's ilk), one group was defending local businesses against a major riot and the other, well, wasn't. So even if you want to castigate BOTH groups involved Rittenhouse still isn't the primary villain. 

 

That really leaves us with one option: Jen believes that what the child molester, burglar, and abuser were doing was the right and proper thing. Perhaps they were even acting on behalf of the proper authorities - in which case Kyle Rittenhouse is a criminal because he killed two civil servants in the course of their duties (during an election year!). 

 

Am I above the target yet?

How many people died in Kenosha during the protest?

[B-Man]

 

 

 

Back to the thread:

 

 

REMINDER.

 

 

 

[BillStime]

21 hours ago, LeviF said:

 

This is hilarious.

 

On video we have the young Rittenhouse being attacked during a riot, during said attack he shoots a convicted kiddie diddler, a burglar, and a wife-beater in what a jury found to be entirely lawful self-defense.

 

So Ms. Jen up here (along with you, our Bostonian friend) must be mad about something OTHER than those facts, correct? 

 

We can speculate that perhaps she is mad about the fact that he was there at all. But why? Is she also angry that the above-mentioned felons showed up armed to riot? Apparently not. And let's be real - of the two groups that showed up (rioters and Rittenhouse's ilk), one group was defending local businesses against a major riot and the other, well, wasn't. So even if you want to castigate BOTH groups involved Rittenhouse still isn't the primary villain. 

 

That really leaves us with one option: Jen believes that what the child molester, burglar, and abuser were doing was the right and proper thing. Perhaps they were even acting on behalf of the proper authorities - in which case Kyle Rittenhouse is a criminal because he killed two civil servants in the course of their duties (during an election year!). 

 

Am I above the target yet?

 

How many people died in Kenosha during the protest?

[LeviF]

6 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

How many people died in Kenosha during the protest?

 

Oh sorry thought I answered before.

 

I don't care. I'm correct. Arson should be a hanging offense.

[BillStime]

6 minutes ago, LeviF said:

 

Oh sorry thought I answered before.

 

I don't care. I'm correct. Arson should be a hanging offense.

 

How many people died in Kenosha during the protest?

[BillStime]

🎯

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

Good News.

 

 

 

New York Supreme Court Nukes Democrat's Red Flag Laws, Includes Biting Message

 

 

The left’s workaround for the Second Amendment, known as “Red Flag Laws,” has been the latest trend in gun confiscation from the authoritarian left. The idea is that anyone can report a citizen for suspicious activity or being a danger to themselves or others, and authorities will arrive at the home and take their firearms. In order to get them back, the accused must go to court and prove they aren’t a danger.

 

It’s the “guilty until proven innocent” world Democrats have always wanted.

 

But this approach always has a myriad of hurdles for Democrats. While many a politician with a “D” next to their name would implement these rules in a second, the left is having to deal with pesky things such as uncooperative law enforcement and a document called the “Constitution.”

 

New York is naturally one of those places that wanted to push Red Flag Laws on the populace, but the state’s Supreme Court recently handed down a ruling that not only put a stop to that scheme, but the Justice who wrote the opinion wanted New York’s politicians to understand in no uncertain terms that this kind of anti-2A nonsense isn’t going to fly.

 

Justice Thomas E. Moran wrote of the case that CPLR-§63, New York’s Red Flag Law, doesn’t “sufficiently protect a citizen’s rights and therefore is unconstitutional.”

While the opinion is dressed in legalese and precedents that collapse New York’s anti-2A attempt, the slap on the wrist comes near the end where Moran makes it crystal clear that the right to bear arms will not be infringed.

 

This Court is not unmindful of the dangers firearms may pose when possessed in the hands of a person suffering a mental illness, harboring a criminal intent, or both. However, when viewed objectively, CPLR §63-a’s goal of removing weapons from the otherwise lawful possession of them by their owners, without adequate constitutional safeguards, cannot be [*8]condoned by this Court.

 

While some may advocate that “the ends justify the means” in support of §63-a, where those means violate a fundamental right under our Bill of Rights to achieve their ends, then the law, on it’s face, cannot stand.

 

Therefore, the “Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order” (TERPO) and “Extreme Risk Protection Order” (ERPO) are deemed to be unconstitutional by this Court as CPLR Article 63-a is presently drafted. It can not be stated clearly enough that the Second Amendment is not a second class right, nor should it ever be treated as such.

 

The final line should be the killing blow for any red flag laws across the nation.

 

 

“It can not be stated clearly enough that the Second Amendment is not a second-class right, nor should it ever be treated as such”

summarizes it all perfectly.

 

 

https://redstate.com/brandon_morse/2023/01/04/new-york-supreme-court-nukes-democrats-red-flag-laws-includes-biting-message-n683078

 

[BillStime]

A 6 year-old... freakn parents groomers

 

 

 

[SoCal Deek]

3 minutes ago, BillStime said:

A 6 year-old... freakn parents groomers

 

 

 

You don’t think your average six year old knows how to shoot a gun? Why…are you five? 

Edited January 7, 2023 by SoCal Deek

[BillStime]

Just now, SoCal Deek said:

You don’t think your average six year old knows how to shoot a gun? Why…are you five? 

 

Gotta love the pro-life Bible thumpers.

[SoCal Deek]

Just now, BillStime said:

 

Gotta love the pro-life Bible thumpers.

Huh? You didn’t know how to pull a trigger when you were six? I did. (Not sure what this has to do with your anti religious bigotry.)

[BillStime]

3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Huh? You didn’t know how to pull a trigger when you were six? I did. (Not sure what this has to do with your anti religious bigotry.)

 

THIS ISN'T ABOUT KNOWING HOW TO USE A GUN!

 

Why does a 6 YEAR-OLD have a GUN?

 

jfc - idiots

[SoCal Deek]

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

 

THIS ISN'T ABOUT KNOWING HOW TO USE A GUN!

 

Why does a 6 YEAR-OLD have a GUN?

 

jfc - idiots

Hey Moron!

Try actually READING the tweets you so readily copy and paste. 

[aristocrat]

Billstime probably says the customer caused the robbery by having the gun 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

Common sense.

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

Armed citizens foil robbery attempt..

 

“When a customer saw 39-year-old Shawn Sutton pull a gun on the clerk at the Ideal Mart in Ellijay, he pulled his own weapon. A second customer then retrieved his gun from his vehicle to assist, and both were able to disarm Sutton. When he tried to escape, a third customer pumping gas came inside with his gun and all three were able to hold him until police arrived.”

 

The Police Chief: “Six minutes can be forever, and these citizens that we have here are self-reliant and decided they’re not going to be victims. And fortunately, they were able to assist us and help us in a way that didn’t put anybody in danger.”

 

https://www.wsbradio.com/news/local/armed-citizens-foil-robbery-attempt/QJZWCHZVWNEK5A6TI2YMOR74XA/