Jump to content

Republicans Are Crying....Again


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 223
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

Obama not only broke the law but went against a long held policy of not negotiating with terrorists. Bergdahl may or may not have been a hero. My advice to you is to take a step back and wait and see how this story develops.

Edited by 3rdnlng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

But wait. Retards like you have been in hysterics about that for 30 years....so now you're saying it was all good?

Oh I'm sorry, douche bag, how many weapons did Obama send to Iran in this deal? You complete idiot

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I'm sorry, douche bag, how many weapons did Obama send to Iran in this deal? You complete idiot

 

LOL....it takes a special kind of stupid to think that some 1970s era hardware going to people we were not at war with (but who were at war with Iraqi soldiers the US ended up fighting a few years later) is somehow more valuable weaponry than five senior military people for the organization that we are currently fighting.

 

conner on, g'tard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

LOL....it takes a special kind of stupid to think that some 1970s era hardware going to people we were not at war with (but who were at war with Iraqi soldiers the US ended up fighting a few years later) is somehow more valuable weaponry than five senior military people for the organization that we are currently fighting.

 

conner on, g'tard.

Not at war with? They were taking Americans hostage. Sure, let's just give American hostage takers all the weapons they want. Yes, that does take a special kind of stupid you total tard. You represent the very low end around here, stupid with stupid to spare.

 

 

 

He's a hero now? What'd he do again?

Oh, a Democratic president saves a vet and now all vets are not heroes, ok Mr Non-Partisan, carry on...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it sound policy to negotiate with terrorists?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Negotiating, it depends. But giving them weapons is totally another and much more serious issue.

We don't live in the comparative, and it's not 1985 anymore, so why don't we focus on the here and now.

 

The reason you don't negotiate with terrorists, is because that is the singular thing that legitimizes terrorism, and makes it effective.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a tough call. For sure we want to get our guy out of there. We paid a very high price. Very high. It's hard to envision the 5 terrorists going back and not engaging in more terrorist activities. Hard to believe that Qatar will keep these guys under control for the long term. The risk of other Americans being held for the same reason goes way up.

 

As long as we're in the trading people for people business, I'd call Mexico tomorrow and work a trade of 10 million of theirs for our former Marine that is in custody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I just read their bios. These were some really bad guys. Two of them are actually wanted by the UN for war crimes.

 

Of course, being that bad, now that they're out in the open, the moment they turn up in Yemen or northwest Pakistan, they're likely to be killed by a drone strike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

We don't live in the comparative, and it's not 1985 anymore, so why don't we focus on the here and now.

 

The reason you don't negotiate with terrorists, is because that is the singular thing that legitimizes terrorism, and makes it effective.

Tell that to John Poindexter

 

 

And the CIA probably put chips in these morons so they will simply lead us to more terrorists. Win win

 

And how were terrorists so different in 1985?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...