truth on hold Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 WASHINGTON — Fifty members of the Senate have signed a letter to the N.F.L. to urge its leadership to press the Washington Redskins to change the team name in the aftermath of tough sanctions against the owner of the Los Angeles Clippers for racially charged comments. http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/05/22/sports/football/citing-nba-example-senators-urge-nfl-to-act-on-redskins-name.html?_r=1&referrer= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kellyto83TD Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 I'd tell Senate to stick it. This country is over offended and over Sensitive. Rub some dirt on it and get over it. More extremist, butt hurt liberals who are the very loud minority finding something else to be 'Offended' about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterpan Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 Blah blah blah the only people who are offended by this name are ignorant white people with nothing better to do. Robert Green, Chief of the Patawomeck Tribe tells theRichmond Times-Dispatch the name isn’t an issue for the vast majority of members of his tribe. “About 98 percent of my tribe is Redskins fans, and it doesn’t offend them, either,” Green said. http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/05/15/american-indian-chief-waste-of-time-to-argue-over-redskins-name/ Dodson is a full-blooded American Inuit chief originally from the Aleutian Tribes of Alaska, and said he was tired of being spoken for as a Native American. “People are speaking for Native Americans that aren’t Native American. Being a full-blooded Indian with my whole family behind me, we had a big problem with all the things that were coming out [of the discussion],” he said. “I think they were basically saying that we were offended, our people were offended, and they were misrepresenting the Native American nation. “We don’t have a problem with [the name] at all; in fact we’re honored. We’re quite honored.” http://www.redskins.com/news-and-events/article-1/Native-American-Chief-Talks-About-Redskins/cdb3c94e-f5c6-4d98-9acd-18d7fb768bb7 My Uncle is part Cherokee, as are my cousins (obviously) and they couldn't care less. My Uncle is a big Chiefs fan too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 What the 50 senators should do is pool the embarrassingly vast pool of riches most of them have, buy the team and change the name. Or STFU and work on things people actually care about. Either one is fine with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanM.D. Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 in before PPP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted May 23, 2014 Author Share Posted May 23, 2014 (edited) Blah blah blah the only people who are offended by this name are ignorant white people with nothing better to do. Robert Green, Chief of the Patawomeck Tribe tells theRichmond Times-Dispatch the name isn’t an issue for the vast majority of members of his tribe. “About 98 percent of my tribe is Redskins fans, and it doesn’t offend them, either,” Green said. http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/05/15/american-indian-chief-waste-of-time-to-argue-over-redskins-name/ Dodson is a full-blooded American Inuit chief originally from the Aleutian Tribes of Alaska, and said he was tired of being spoken for as a Native American. “People are speaking for Native Americans that aren’t Native American. Being a full-blooded Indian with my whole family behind me, we had a big problem with all the things that were coming out [of the discussion],” he said. “I think they were basically saying that we were offended, our people were offended, and they were misrepresenting the Native American nation. “We don’t have a problem with [the name] at all; in fact we’re honored. We’re quite honored.” http://www.redskins.com/news-and-events/article-1/Native-American-Chief-Talks-About-Redskins/cdb3c94e-f5c6-4d98-9acd-18d7fb768bb7 My Uncle is part Cherokee, as are my cousins (obviously) and they couldn't care less. My Uncle is a big Chiefs fan too. But "chief" is a seniority designation, the tribe leader's title. "Redskin" refers to an actual physical feature, the skin tone, which can be a hot button for racial sensitivities. Edited May 23, 2014 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Landing Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 (edited) I'd tell Senate to stick it. This country is over offended and over Sensitive. Rub some dirt on it and get over it. More extremist, butt hurt liberals who are the very loud minority finding something else to be 'Offended' about. Numerous Native American tribes, as well as the National Congress of American Indians have spoken out against the name, claiming that it is offensive, and tantamount to the "N-word." Would you characterize the Native American community as, "extremist, butt hurt liberals?" http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/11/27/native-american-leaders-speak-out-against-redskins-name/ Edited May 23, 2014 by Rocky Landing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg F Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 If the team wanted a really offensive name they would change the name to the Washington Politicians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternOHBillsFan Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 Numeerous Americans, as well as other Natives, have spoken for the name or that they just don't give a care. Some people are overly offended and are trying to capitalize on the Sterling and Cuban stories, and of course what else would the Senate be doing!??!!? Ohh, that's right, actual important work for the country and not dealing with this crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 I think the NFL should change the names of every franchise to a racial slur. It would create some pretty good rivalries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 Yawn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg F Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 ... and of course what else would the Senate be doing!??!!? Ohh, that's right, actual important work for the country and not dealing with this crap. You speak as if the Senate doing "important work" is a good thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 I'd tell Senate to stick it. This country is over offended and over Sensitive. Rub some dirt on it and get over it. More extremist, butt hurt liberals who are the very loud minority finding something else to be 'Offended' about. I'm shocked an older, white person isn't offended by the term Redskins. If there was a team called the Detroit Darkies, we should jsut keep it because it's tradition. This country is falling apart because we can't use slurs like we used to!!! The simple solution is poll Native American tribes and let them vote on the name. If it's cool with them, then stop with trying to change it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy in 4C Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 Easy solution - poll the major tribes - let them decide if it is offensive. If it is, then change it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted May 23, 2014 Author Share Posted May 23, 2014 I'm shocked an older, white person isn't offended by the term Redskins. If there was a team called the Detroit Darkies, we should jsut keep it because it's tradition. This country is falling apart because we can't use slurs like we used to!!! The simple solution is poll Native American tribes and let them vote on the name. If it's cool with them, then stop with trying to change it. Well that to me really gets to heart of the matter: Who speaks for a community? What absolute number of people who find it offensive is enough to have it changed? Or what percent of the referenced community? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 Well that to me really gets to heart of the matter: Who speaks for a community? What absolute number of people who find it offensive is enough to have it changed? Or what percent of the referenced community? Majority of the offended community. Why do people feel the need to defend people using slurs? I'm not a woman so why should I care if a woman gets called a see you next tuesday? It's called treating people with respect. If this offends Native Americans (who really have no voice in this country), who are we to say? And if it doesn't, then keep it. Not hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 I'd tell Senate to stick it. This country is over offended and over Sensitive. Rub some dirt on it and get over it. More extremist, butt hurt liberals who are the very loud minority finding something else to be 'Offended' about. so what you are saying is that you are extremely, and vocally, offended over this non-issue? perhaps you could rub some dirt on it and get over it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted May 23, 2014 Author Share Posted May 23, 2014 (edited) Majority of the offended community. Why do people feel the need to defend people using slurs? I'm not a woman so why should I care if a woman gets called a see you next tuesday? It's called treating people with respect. If this offends Native Americans (who really have no voice in this country), who are we to say? And if it doesn't, then keep it. Not hard. If a poll is actually practical, let's say 10,000,000 people qualify. What if 40% respond its offensive to them? Its not a majority but still a large percentage and 4,000,000 people. Still keep the name? What if 90% of the respondents reply its offensive but its only 5% of the available voters? They get to speak for the other 95% who didn't even care enough to vote? Edited May 23, 2014 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheZone78 Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 I'm offended at those who are offended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwight in philly Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 (edited) too bad they(the senate) didnt take up the V A bill that the house sent to them.. sorting out and solving the V A mess strikes me as a tad more important than the freakin "redskins" name.. Edited May 23, 2014 by dwight in philly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts