boyst Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Per ESPN text, Gailey says that CJ Spiller will get 60% of the snaps, 40% to FJ. What about Choice? And more seriously, why not use them together at the same time!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOBILLS78 Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 And of that 60 percent, 90 percent will be passes. (Makes fart sound into hand) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 So that's 12 for CJ and 8 for FJ.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Yeah, it matters now. 7 losses. !@#$! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theesir Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 He said this this morning on Howard Simon. He said 60-40 SNAPS, and reiterated not necessarily carries. Listening to him has become like listening to a crap fountain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 He waited until week 13 to start giving his best player majority of the snaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 I give up on the whole CJ vs FJ Carry's thing. Yesterday CJ ripped off a 41 yard run. Do they then give it to FJ so CJ can catch a little air? No he gets it again. Then again. There is no logic here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Per NFL Netwerk: Chan Gailey says that coaching staff will "try more seriously" to win games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KollegeStudnet Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 to decipher what Chan is saying... ...7 carries for CJ ...6 carries for Fred ...55 passing attempts for Futz ...be down by 20 points by the 3rd qaurter! It's like the screen play for every weekend for the past 3 years Per NFL Netwerk: Chan Gailey says that coaching staff will "try more seriously" to win games. I would've liked if they tried more seriously...a while ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marauderswr80 Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Chan can go F himself..... They all can go F themselves! Worthless bunch of A-holes.... Per NFL Netwerk: Chan Gailey says that coaching staff will "try more seriously" to win games. Huh? If that was seriously reported....im gonna puke! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 26, 2012 Author Share Posted November 26, 2012 Why can't we just put both on the field? Why keep your best athletes on the field?! Screens can be run with two backs. Huh? If that was seriously reported....im gonna puke! Per Merrian Websters - Gulible is not in the dictionary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Yeah, it matters now. 7 losses. !@#$! :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills1960 Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 How does that game yesterday make you jump to a conclusion like that?! If anything Freddy's workload should be deducted after yesterday! I love Fred but he's lost that step as all RB's his age do. Gailey is just lost right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Whoopdefreakindoo! Look at the top gainers for Sunday and what stands out? One of them only received 14 carries. Gailey is a moron. The next lowest was 19 carries. Wonder what would happen if Spiller carried the ball another 5-10 times a game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drhockey Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 (edited) It's like sex panther cologne... They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time, it works every time... Edited November 26, 2012 by drhockey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marauderswr80 Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Why can't we just put both on the field? Why keep your best athletes on the field?! Screens can be run with two backs. Per Merrian Websters - Gulible is not in the dictionary. Whats sad is id never put it past them! And you know its true! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 (edited) Why can't we just put both on the field? Why keep your best athletes on the field?! Screens can be run with two backs. Per Merrian Websters - Gulible is not in the dictionary. I guess it is time to hang up my "In Chan We Trust" t-shirt... I will hang it next to my Hank Bullough t-shirt that says "In Hank We Stank" Edited November 27, 2012 by Buftex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshawn's 20 bucks Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 CJ versus FJ is now a moot point. We have no shot. Ugggh So depressing. I keep telling myself that the team won't be good because the organisation is not good, and the organisation won't be good until Mr. Wilson or his heirs sell the team, but I keep thinking and hoping we'll get lucky. Why do I feel so dejected when my mind predicted this--my heart secretly hopes every year and every year I'm disappointed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 27, 2012 Author Share Posted November 27, 2012 CJ versus FJ is now a moot point. We have no shot. Ugggh So depressing. I keep telling myself that the team won't be good because the organisation is not good, and the organisation won't be good until Mr. Wilson or his heirs sell the team, but I keep thinking and hoping we'll get lucky. Why do I feel so dejected when my mind predicted this--my heart secretly hopes every year and every year I'm disappointed. How can two players on the same team be against each other unless they are QB's?! We can put both of these guys on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 How can two players on the same team be against each other unless they are QB's?! We can put both of these guys on the field. It's not in Chan's voluminous playbook. Tavaris Jackson has read the entire work and he's confirmed "no plays with 2 RBs on the field" at once unless both are split wide due to a Ruvell Martin injury. Stop trying to make sense out of nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts