Dr. K Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 (edited) It certainly looked to me that Bowe's second foot came down clearly and unequivocally out of bounds. I thought all TDs were reviewed. Why wasn't this one reversed? Edited September 16, 2012 by Dr. K Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optometric Insight Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 Because no one cared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrojanitor Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 because it was worth only 6 points and not 29. So no one cared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. K Posted September 16, 2012 Author Share Posted September 16, 2012 Here's the video. Look at the final replay. http://www.nfl.com/videos/buffalo-bills/0ap1000000062671/Dwayne-Bowe-scores-again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 Because Bowe was on my fantasy team... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max997 Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 Bc they wanted to give you the chance to use unequivocally in a sentence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stony Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 It certainly looked to me that Bowe's second foot came down clearly and unequivocally out of bounds. I thought all TDs were reviewed. Why wasn't this one reversed? Because his foot was in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. K Posted September 16, 2012 Author Share Posted September 16, 2012 Because his foot was in. wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stony Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 wrong I won't even begin to argue over an inconsequential play at the tail end of a Bills' route, but it looked like it was a great catch and his foot was in. Agree to disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hater Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 Why is this a Topic it didn't effect the games out come Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Goodell Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 It certainly looked to me that Bowe's second foot came down clearly and unequivocally out of bounds. I thought all TDs were reviewed. Why wasn't this one reversed? It was reviewed and determined to be a valid touchdown. Once again the new officials performed up to the NFL's high standards. I won't even begin to argue over an inconsequential play at the tail end of a Bills' route, but it looked like it was a great catch and his foot was in. Agree to disagree. *rout* Why is this a Topic it didn't effect the games out come *affect* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. K Posted September 16, 2012 Author Share Posted September 16, 2012 I agree it did not affect the outcome of the game. I was just surprised. I'd like to see the actual reply from the broadcast, as it looked pretty clear there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max997 Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 *rout* *affect* Seriously? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 Yep, 2nd foot was clearly out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 unless you had an ungodly points spread or it ruined your FFL who cares. I see the game as won 35 - 3 final score. 2nd stringers and prevent.... it didn't matter at that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mountainwampus Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Both feet were in. It was clearly visible in the HD broadcast replay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 It was reviewed. All TDs are. It was a TD, clearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeMonkey Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Both feet were in. It was clearly visible in the HD broadcast replay. Agree. At the very least it was close enough not to be able to overturn. Certainly not "clearly and unequivocally out of bounds" as the OP contends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Because no one cared. Um, when you're playing against Bowe in fantasy, you care. Stupid garbage tds. Dammit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clownments22 Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 I won't agree to disagree with anyone on this. He was definitely in bounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts