In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 His wonderful centerpiece of statesmanship - his Middle East policy - is burning daily and the vision of the sodomized and suffocated American ambassador to Libya is tucked away next to those of Bin Laden. say what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayman Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 Good lord even the Cain Train himself trying to pile on... Herman Cain would have a "substantial lead" over President Barack Obama if Republicans had made him their nominee, according to Herman Cain, who spoke at the University of Florida on Thursday. From The Gainesville Sun: Cain told members of the media after the speech that Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney's recent "47 percent" comment was a "non-story" being blown out of proportion by the media. But Cain said he would have been doing better if he was the nominee, saying that he'd probably have a "substantial lead" on President Barack Obama at this point. "The reason is quite simple: I have some depth to my ideas," he said. Cain ran for the Republican nomination in 2011. He dropped out of the race in December and ultimately endorsed former House Speaker Newt Gingrich before Mitt Romney sealed the nomination. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/herman-cain-says-substantial-lead-over-obama-135949668--election.html?_esi=1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 Good lord even the Cain Train himself trying to pile on... Herman Cain would have a "substantial lead" over President Barack Obama if Republicans had made him their nominee, according to Herman Cain, who spoke at the University of Florida on Thursday. From The Gainesville Sun: Cain told members of the media after the speech that Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney's recent "47 percent" comment was a "non-story" being blown out of proportion by the media. But Cain said he would have been doing better if he was the nominee, saying that he'd probably have a "substantial lead" on President Barack Obama at this point. "The reason is quite simple: I have some depth to my ideas," he said. Cain ran for the Republican nomination in 2011. He dropped out of the race in December and ultimately endorsed former House Speaker Newt Gingrich before Mitt Romney sealed the nomination. http://news.yahoo.co...ion.html?_esi=1 I would have enjoyed seeing Cain run against Obama just to hear the MSM try to brand him as a racist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayman Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 I would have enjoyed seeing Cain run against Obama just to hear the MSM try to brand him as a racist There should be a new rule in America...you are not allowed to complain about left wing media you think is stupid, if you consume right wing media that is also stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 There should be a new rule in America...you are not allowed to complain about left wing media you think is stupid, if you consume right wing media that is also stupid and believe every word has hard fact. :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 WHO SHOT FIRST AND AIMED LATER? Obama’s Embassy Cover Story Dissolves. “There is ample evidence that the administration screwed up" JOHN PODHORETZ: The Gang That Can’t Lie Straight: Team O At Odds On Libya Attack. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 (edited) When did someone’s "opinion" become hard fact? DOH ! Silly me .... when it supports the crazies in the corner. Edited September 21, 2012 by BillsFan-4-Ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 There should be a new rule in America...you are not allowed to complain about left wing media you think is stupid, if you consume right wing media that is also stupid I live in Canada I don't consume right wing media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 WHO SHOT FIRST AND AIMED LATER? Obama’s Embassy Cover Story Dissolves. “There is ample evidence that the administration screwed up" JOHN PODHORETZ: The Gang That Can’t Lie Straight: Team O At Odds On Libya Attack. I've never seen a so-called "leader" refuse to take so little, if not no, blame for the problems under his watch. But that's the lib playbook: blame it on someone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 As the seconds pass Myth's numbers drop President Barack Obama leads Mitt Romney in Colorado, Iowa and Wisconsin, reaching the key 50 percent support threshold in all three battlegrounds, according to the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Marist polls of these states. In both Colorado and Wisconsin, Obama is ahead by 5 points among likely voters (including those leaning toward a candidate), 50 percent to 45 percent. http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/20/13993186-polls-obama-ahead-in-colorado-iowa-and-wisconsin?lite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 (edited) Of course, I have no evidence to back this up, but my feeling is that Romney's statement on 47% will mean %$#&-all to those who are really independant... Well now we all have evidence to back you up: We see this with the now-infamous “47 percent” comment. Gallup described the statement and asked how it would affectrespondents’ votes. Twenty percent said it would make them more likely to vote for Romney, 36 percent said less likely, and 43 percent said it would make no difference. Drilling down to self-described Independents, 15 percent said it would make them more likely to support Romney, 29 percent less likely, and 53 percent said it would make no difference. You can try to sex that up (as Gallup did) to read that Independents say it makes them less likely to vote for Romney by a 2-1 margin, but you could just as easily say that three-quarters of independents say the gaffe makes no difference or helps Romney." http://www.realclear...s_115513-3.html The 36%, of all voters...are the people who are dependent on government...who Romney isn't targeting, and doesn't care if he offends, because as HE SAID, they aren't going to vote for him anyway. And, while I am sure that Romney would rather not have offended ANY independents, we also KNOW that many of the people calling themselves "independent" this time around, weren't so independent last time. Many of them are "I don't want to call myself a D because they are stinking the place up"....so yeah...25% of would be Ds are offended...but 75% aren't. And, the 15% who like it...are the other "fringe Independents" who don't want to call themselves Rs for whatever reason. The middle...the real Independents....DON"T GIVE A F! Ds need to own that, and move on to why their President felt it was necessary to lie about terrorism. That story will last the next 3 weeks, and into the debates. The 47% story dies...today. Own that too. Edited September 21, 2012 by OCinBuffalo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 Let me guess. Whoever really cares about these polls loves preseason power rankings as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 (edited) The President is a failure. His wonderful centerpiece of statesmanship - his Middle East policy - is burning daily and the vision of the sodomized and suffocated American ambassador to Libya is tucked away next to those of Bin Laden. The Muslims there don't hate us because of a movie, they hate us because they !@#$ing hate us. It's that simple. They don't like Jews, they don't like us. say what? I heard this described as...."darker things are suggested to have happened to the body of the ambassador". Sodomizing a dead guy? Or, was that done before he was killed? As he was being suffocated? For Ron Paul supporters: What exactly is does more free trade with these people do...on the necrophiliac sodomizing front? For Obama supporters: Of course we have to tolerate this, right? After all, sodomy has a long tradition in the war practices of the Muslim world. Or, do you think this isn't an act of war? Just ask Vlad Tepes, who many think became Vlad the Impaler....primarily as revenge for his being sodomized by Muslims. But, according to you, not only should we be tolerant of the Muslim culture on display here, historically consistent mind you, but we must also be tolerant because gay sex is involved, right? All sarcasm aside: it's far past time for both groups of children to grow up. There really is evil in the world, yes, there are good guys, and bad guys, you Jimmy Carter neophytes, and if the good guys do nothing, the bad guys, do...in fact...win. You have no moral high ground. You never did. You merely deluded yourself. Even if there was moral high ground? You wouldn't know where to find it. Edited September 22, 2012 by OCinBuffalo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 For Ron Paul supporters: What exactly is does more free trade with these people do...on the necrophiliac sodomizing front? Ask your question in English please As I a Ron Paul supporter, I'll step up and respond I'll go out on a limb and assume that you're asking what free trade in this scenario do to both America and Libyans For Americans, we can choose to take our business elsewhere. Kind of like Dish TV not offering AMC. At the end of your contractual obiligations you are free to subscribe to a different provider and start watching Breaking Bad, Mad Men, Walking Dead, and Hell on Wheels For Libyans, after the trade dollars and American food (we do kinda feed the world) stop pouring in their regime will start to feel the heat. They can either reform and play nice, or be dicks with no money nor food Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 (edited) I heard this described as...."darker things are suggested to have happened to the body of the ambassador". Sodomizing a dead guy? Or, was that done before he was killed? As he was being suffocated? except that there was no sodomy, no dragging his body through the streets, nor any dark things actually happened. Eyewitnesses stated that his body was found still breathing in the burned out consulate, they picked him up, carried him outside and rushed him to the hospital in a private car. And it all jives with the doctor's statement. Video taken by al-Bakoush and posted on YouTube shows Stevens being carried out of the room through a window with a raised shutter. “Bring him out, man,” someone shouts. “Out of the way, out of the way!” “Alive, Alive!” come other shouts, then a cheer of “God is great.” The next scene shows Stevens lying on a tile floor, with one man touching his neck to check his pulse. Al-Bakoush said that after that scene, they put Stevens in a private car to rush to the hospital. Edited September 22, 2012 by In-A-Gadda-Levitre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayman Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 Ask your question in English please As I a Ron Paul supporter, I'll step up and respond I'll go out on a limb and assume that you're asking what free trade in this scenario do to both America and Libyans For Americans, we can choose to take our business elsewhere. Kind of like Dish TV not offering AMC. At the end of your contractual obiligations you are free to subscribe to a different provider and start watching Breaking Bad, Mad Men, Walking Dead, and Hell on Wheels For Libyans, after the trade dollars and American food (we do kinda feed the world) stop pouring in their regime will start to feel the heat. They can either reform and play nice, or be dicks with no money nor food You are talking with a man who calls this "Muslim culture on display." You are more foolish than him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 You are talking with a man who calls this "Muslim culture on display." You are more foolish than him. In my defense, I'm working my thru a case of beer. Tomorrow I will be sober So what's your excuse? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayman Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 (edited) In my defense, I'm working my thru a case of beer. Tomorrow I will be sober So what's your excuse? All is forgiven. I rarely PPP during the day. And I rarely do not drink at night. I apologize for neither, despite not being Mitt Romney. Edited September 22, 2012 by TheNewBills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 I rarely PPP during the day. Your 2.6k posts claim otherwise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayman Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 Your 2.6k posts claim otherwise hehe...well I rarely do not drink during the day then....there...you happy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts