MClem06 Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 QB Kirk Cousins, Michigan State Brock Osweiler, Arizona State Ryan Tannehill, Texas A&M Russell Wilson, Wisconsin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Either Wilson or Cousins but i voted for wilson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 I voted Wilson because the worst case scenario is he can probably provide a much better spark off the bench than Thigpen, MAAAAAYBE push Fitz a little down the road in a year or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloATL Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 You could talk me into any of the round 2-4 picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Osweiler, Cousins, or Wilson would all be respectable developmental picks, 3rd round or later. I don't want the Bills to even consider Tannehill at #10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowery4 Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 The one I like best is last, I don't really think he will last til the 4th but maybe. So yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MClem06 Posted April 18, 2012 Author Share Posted April 18, 2012 Interesting that no one likes Tannenhill at 10. I can definitly see him dropping big time if he isn't taken by the time he reaches the Bills. Osweiler is a HUGE guy that's unproven and when i watched the video on Buffalobills.com about QB prospects he seemed a bit cocky in saying, no 6 foot 7 QB can do what i do with the ball... Maybe good maybe bad but he looked like a boy in an overgrown man's body. At least Big Ben out of college looked like grown a$$ man coming into the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeverOutNick Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Like all 4 of these QBs but NO QUESTION I want Russell Wilson! After watching his highlights, interviews and Gruden Camp, he is such a genuine and special kid that has all the intangibles and ability you want in your QB. Who cares that he's a little short, he'll find a way to win... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Ugh, this is like having to choose your hottest cousin to make out with... I guess if we HAD to take one, Id pick Wilson in the 4th. Definitely dont want to waste a pick in the 1st or 2nd, and Cousins is not good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Last Guy on the Bench Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 I voted for Wilson. I am completely on that bandwagon. I think you'd have to burn a third on him, though. I think he'll have more interest than most people are assuming. In fact, I wouldn't at all be surprised to see him go sometime in the 2nd round. I hate the idea of Tannehill. Doesn't have the experience. Doesn't seem clutch. Here's an interesting critique from Greg Gabriel: http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/thedailydolphin/2012/04/18/former-chicago-bears-college-scouting-director-says-ryan-tannehills-on-field-performance-warrants-2nd-or-3rd-round-pick/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section122 Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Ugh, this is like having to choose your hottest cousin to make out with... I guess if we HAD to take one, Id pick Wilson in the 4th. Definitely dont want to waste a pick in the 1st or 2nd, and Cousins is not good. Yep and I don't have any cousins named Kate Upton lol. If I have to follow the rules of this pole it's Wilson in the 4th. I'm not enamored with any of them tbh though at the rounds they are projected, if you pushed every player down a round I have an easier time picking. Tannehill in the 2nd and I'd be okay, Osweiller in the 3rd I wouldn't mind, Cousins I don't care much for in any round, and Wilson in the 4th is I guess about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPS Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Ugh, this is like having to choose your hottest cousin to make out with... I guess if we HAD to take one, Id pick Wilson in the 4th. Definitely dont want to waste a pick in the 1st or 2nd, and Cousins is not good. Why so hard on Cousins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Why so hard on Cousins? Because Ive watched him play. Besides a number of regular games Ive seen him look bad in, all I can ever think about is the Iron Bowl performance from a couple years ago when Dareus spent the majority of the game making Cousins look like a scared 8 year old. He was the least impressive out of all the QBs on Gruden's Camp show. I just dont like him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section122 Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Because Ive watched him play. Besides a number of regular games Ive seen him look bad in, all I can ever think about is the Iron Bowl performance from a couple years ago when Dareus spent the majority of the game making Cousins look like a scared 8 year old. He was the least impressive out of all the QBs on Gruden's Camp show. I just dont like him. The fade that he couldn't throw against no coverage you mean? Wow that was bad at one point the receiver even raised the ball to pretend he was highpointing. Reminded me of a catcher framing the pitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 I go with Wilson out of the 4. Wouldn't touch Tannehill till the 4th or 5th Round of the draft, if at all, Osweiler is a poor man's Ryan Msllett, didn't really care for Cousins that much to see him worth a 3rd Round pick IMO,and so by my calculation I would go with Wilson in the 4th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1B4IDie Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 (edited) Taking a QB under 6'1" is a stupid waste of time. (period) It is beyond stupid to waste any draft pick, even a 7th, on the hopes that you catch Flutie (Heisman winner) Vick (Heisman 3rd Runner up) Brees (Heisman 4th Runner up) Lightening. Russell Wilson (0 Heisman votes) is not in the same universe as either of those 3. Words can not describe how stupid it is to think that drafting a 5'10" QB in any round is a good idea in the year 2012. Yeah the fans feel great, "Man that guy is the same size as me, maybe I can QB an NFL team" However it is stupid stupid stupid. Yes you personally should question your stupidity if you think it is a good idea to draft Russell Wilson. Maybe bring him in as UDFA and see if he can be a camp arm, but don't waste a pick. Edited April 18, 2012 by Why So Serious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 The fade that he couldn't throw against no coverage you mean? Wow that was bad at one point the receiver even raised the ball to pretend he was highpointing. Reminded me of a catcher framing the pitch. Yes, that horrible throw. And just the way he answered and asked questions. Dont like him on tape. Dont like him in the interview. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts