MarkyMannn Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Now serving 33 yrs for armed robbery - I can't help but think that sentence is 2-3x what it would have been for anyone else. A little retribution for skating on Nicole & Ron's deaths? I always wondered . . . KARMA.................. Hey OJ, enjoy your stay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Jack Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 This sounds like a case for disjunctive syllogism... DC Tom is either (A) a murderer or (B) not a murderer The cut on his thumb is irrelevant due to the possibility of racism within the police department (i.e., not (A)) THEREFORE, DC Tom is (B) not a murderer (but he will kick your ass if you say dumb crap) Doesn't matter, Tom is a middle age, white American male, so it's self defense. Now if he was a white hispanic...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpberr Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 It makes you think because it's a plausible theory. Jason Simpson was 24 at the time, a big guy, skilled with knives, and prone to violence and aggression and not a big fan of stepmom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 (edited) I have always thought that it was entirely possible that Jason did it, and that OJ was there. I have yet to see anything that would make me believe that Jason could not have been there, although I haven't followed it close since it happened. And it was the only remotely plausible theory where OJ wasn't the killer and yet acted the way he did. I still think chances are that OJ did it, but it's certainly a reasonable chance that Jason did, and there are many clues that would make someone believe he did. Edited April 3, 2012 by Kelly the Dog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 OJ is, and only ever will be, guilty of one thing....Being a bad A $$ Buffalo Bill... Miami may have the oranges, but we've got The Juice!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SelmonSmith6378 Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Isn;t it funny how we hear about this 17 years after the trial? Just OJ trying to regain his sparkly clean image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Isn;t it funny how we hear about this 17 years after the trial? Just OJ trying to regain his sparkly clean image. When the verdict was announced, I was putting gas in my car. You...were not even born yet. I owned a car. You didn't exist. I am very old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 When the verdict was announced, I was putting gas in my car. You...were not even born yet. I owned a car. You didn't exist. I am very old. We were having a 'guilty' or 'not guilty' office pool. There was about a 4:1 ratio for people guessing at 'guilty'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 We were having a 'guilty' or 'not guilty' office pool. There was about a 4:1 ratio for people guessing at 'guilty'. "Gulity...if not for the fact that the LAPD can't frame a guilty man." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevewin Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Found the video - this is part 1 of 2 OJ guilty but not of murder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 "Gulity...if not for the fact that the LAPD can't frame a guilty man." Sure you can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dib Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Well that explains why he couldnt find the true killer on all those golf courses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts