TakeYouToTasker Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 (edited) and I told you before Rob its not that simple... Stating something and explaining something are two very different things. You can state it all you like, but you haven't explained why you're right. Edited July 2, 2013 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Duck Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 (edited) On the blood from the nose, maybe its just me, but I find it hard to believe all the blood went down his throat or backwards down Zimmermans nasal passsages when you take into consideration the sheer volume and imediate swelling/blockage that would occur Stating something and explaining something are two very different things. You can state it all you like, but you haven't explained why you're right. I've explained why I think he was negligent numerous times, the track down was unwarranted because no crime was commited to begin with, and Zimmerman should have taken the dispatchers instructions, instead, he took the law into his own hands, comprende? Edited July 2, 2013 by dog14787 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 No. If what has been paraded in front of the jury box is all the evidence the prosecution has, then this is an incredible waste of tax payer dollars flushed down the toilet of race-baiting and political headway. If Barack Obama had a politically/racially motivated nothing-burger trial to distract the minds of America, it would look like Trayvon Martin's trial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 and I told you before Rob its not that simple... And I explained why it is that simple. Do you have an explanation for your erroneous assertion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Against my own words. Dog, what do you do for a living? Dorothy W. Parker @DrDorothyParker 18s #ZIMMERMANON9 "The most hated man in America" now he knows how Black men in this country feel everyday of their lives or does he...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Duck Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 (edited) I don't know if you realize it or not, but you just admitted there is no evidence to support the conviction of GZ. You lose. Is a drunk driver thats killed somebody breaking the law while hes drinking? No, he is not, but when he gets behind the wheel of a car his negligence sets forth a series of events that causes loss of life Zimmermans not a cop, hes a neghborhood watch, its not his job to track down and interigate , his job is to report suspicious activity to the proper authorities so this kind of thing doesn't happen Edited July 2, 2013 by dog14787 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Is a drunk driver thats killed somebody breaking the law while hes drinking? I am going to play along, because it's fun. It's like throwing things at the tards in class. In most cases, a man drinking before he operates a motor vehicle is not breaking the law. If he is drinking in public or otherwise not allowed to consume alcohol - then he is legally allowed to drink alcohol and as much as he'd like. Whats your point, nitwit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Is a drunk driver thats killed somebody breaking the law while hes drinking? I have seen better discussion from actual dogs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 I have seen better discussion from actual dogs. Quit playing with your food Tom "Fools make feasts and wise men eat them." -- Ben Franklin . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Duck Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Against my own words. Dog, what do you do for a living? Semi retired Nuclear Consruction/ Operations Survey Engineer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Semi retired Nuclear Consruction/ Operations Survey Engineer Squirrel! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 On HLN after dark last night 11 out of 12 jurors don't find Zimmermans story credible. How do you explain them kind of numbers If the lead investigators testimony is coming across so strong? HLN handpicks people to make whatever statement they want. And the MSM has been calling this a racial killing since day one. And regardless -- you do realize that "11 out of 12 jurors don't find Zimmerman's story credible" means he's found not guilty, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 (edited) TheSociologyStudent @SociologyStudnt 1m#ZIMMERMANON9 you murder someone how do you have people waiting to take you home from the police station. They can hold you 48 hours right? HA I love this court book report we are making and discussion of heresay. Edited July 2, 2013 by jboyst62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Is a drunk driver thats killed somebody breaking the law while hes drinking? No, he is not, but when he gets behind the wheel of a car his negligence sets forth a series of events that causes loss of life Zimmermans not a cop, hes a neghborhood watch, its not his job to track down and interigate , his job is to report suspicious activity to the proper authorities so this kind of thing doesn't happen That's a really poor analogy. Again, you've merely stated that you don't understand what manslaughter is, what negligence is, and how negligence applies in the context of manslaughter. It's like you're arguing that in your opinion a receiver scores a TD if PI is called in the end zone. And your drunk driving analogy is like supporting that theory on the grounds that holding penalties can result in a loss of yards.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Semi retired Nuclear Consruction/ Operations Survey Engineer Most not be that difficult or time consuming. Wait, are you the one with the shovel or wheelbarrel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Semi retired Nuclear Consruction/ Operations Survey Engineer So you're the head janitor at the power plant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Most not be that difficult or time consuming. Wait, are you the one with the shovel or wheelbarrel? Radiation exposure testing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 (edited) I've explained why I think he was negligent numerous times, the track down was unwarranted because no crime was commited to begin with, and Zimmerman should have taken the dispatchers instructions, instead, he took the law into his own hands, comprende? OK, wait... You believe that all points of inquiry should report, retroactively, to if a crime had been commited before the inquiry about the commission of said possible crime? What kind of !@#$ed up and completely unworkable standard is that? Additionally, and I'm not sure why you're making me repeat myself, but I'll present for the third or fourth time now that: a) dispatchers are not police officers and don't have the authority to tell someone to stand down, and b) the dispatcher told him "he didn't have to", not "do not do". Edited July 2, 2013 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Radiation exposure testing. God, I breath a sigh of relief hoping he is now sterile... We do not need any pups in this world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts