mjt328 Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Follow up to Poz post. Full article: http://buffalobillsstampede.blogspot.com/2011/06/should-bills-re-sign-donte-whitner.html We all know the team should have drafted Pro-Bowl tackle Haloti Ngata instead. We all know Whitner lacks the talent of top NFL safeties like Ed Reed and Troy Polamalu. But that doesn't mean Whitner can't be a contributor. Like every player, Whitner has strengths and he has weaknesses. It's hard to ignore a player that racks up 140 tackles in a season, which Whitner did in 2010 thanks in part to the team's switch to a 3-4 defensive scheme. But as solid as he's been against the run, Whitner has struggled just as badly in coverage. His Week 7 performance last year against Todd Heap was as awful as they come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillsSD Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 It depends on what his price is, if he wants elite money then no, but if he is reasonable then yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meathead Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 correct answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Yes we "should", it just depends on his salary demands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Should we sign __________ ? He's not that great, but he's the best we have at that position. I guess it depends on how much he demands. (template) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 It depends on what his price is, if he wants elite money then no, but if he is reasonable then yes. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PDaDdy Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Same thing I said for Poz. It all depends on the salary. Donte is a good safety. He is not #9 overall good but he is a solid player. If people could forget where he was drafted and just focus on him being a lunch pail type player he would be just another one of the guys. As usual with Bufrfalo fans we will try to run a solid player out of town just because he wasn't an all star safety because he was drafted at the #9 spot. It's not his fault our developmentally disabled front office picked Donte at #9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 (edited) Excerpted from the Poz thread: Yes, if we can sign him at "fair market value." If he becomes an UFA under the new CBA, and some team gives him a ridiculous above-market offer… that's different. Haven't checked out the comparables yet so I don't know what that number would be. Edited June 8, 2011 by San Jose Bills Fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDD Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 (edited) Same thing I said for Poz. It all depends on the salary. Donte is a good safety. He is not #9 overall good but he is a solid player. If people could forget where he was drafted and just focus on him being a lunch pail type player he would be just another one of the guys. As usual with Bufrfalo fans we will try to run a solid player out of town just because he wasn't an all star safety because he was drafted at the #9 spot. It's not his fault our developmentally disabled front office picked Donte at #9. +1 By the way he cleared out his locker at the end of the season before the rest of the team and media arrived, and by Nix's comments and drafting, I think it's fair to say he's done in Buffalo. Edited June 8, 2011 by Mr. Wonderful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbosrrgood Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 (edited) This is a different type of situation than the POZ one. The thing with Whitner is, we already have a better starter on the team. Bryan Scott. So why get into a bidding war over this guy? He was a hard hitter, but whiffed many times as well. I bowed my head in disappointment many times when Whitner went for a big hit, only to bounce of as the opposing player just kept running, he never wrapped up when tackling ...he struggled mightily in coverage, and looked awful when asked to cover tight ends. Scott is better and coverage, and is still very big and a solid tackler. We also signed a promising looking SS in Searcy, along with talk of Aaron Williams being a possible safety. Not to mention Whitner is a douche. Actually if I had to pick one of the two to sign it would be POZ for depth, it's a bigger position of need (but again only at the right contract). Edited June 8, 2011 by Turbosrrgood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 This is a different type of situation than the POZ one. The thing with Whitner is, we already have a better starter on the team. Bryan Scott. Your ability to assess players needs to be questioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr1 Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Paying 8 mill a year for a a guy that congratulates players on the other team when they get a first down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Estelle Getty Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 no he sucks.....wait to see what cher's demands are, maybe we can sign her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbosrrgood Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 (edited) Your ability to assess players needs to be questioned. Question away...Even though you don't offer any reasoning behind your "questioning". So are you saying you didn't watch Whitner miss tackle after tackle? Get beat badly on almost every throw to a TE? Have you watched the two? Scott actually took the starting job away from Whitner in 2009 (Thank you Fewell), Scott had 16 starts between 2008-2009 even at times when Donte was healthy (Ok, a couple of those were at LB)...There was good reason for that. As others have pointed out Nix doesn't seem to have any interest in bringing him back, so I am guessing he doesn't feel too much differently... Edited June 8, 2011 by Turbosrrgood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaaadThingsMan Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Nah we have players to replace him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOKBILLS Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 No thank you... Next... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbosrrgood Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Nah we have players to replace him Exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PDaDdy Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 This is a different type of situation than the POZ one. The thing with Whitner is, we already have a better starter on the team. Bryan Scott. So why get into a bidding war over this guy? He was a hard hitter, but whiffed many times as well. I bowed my head in disappointment many times when Whitner went for a big hit, only to bounce of as the opposing player just kept running, he never wrapped up when tackling ...he struggled mightily in coverage, and looked awful when asked to cover tight ends. Scott is better and coverage, and is still very big and a solid tackler. We also signed a promising looking SS in Searcy, along with talk of Aaron Williams being a possible safety. Not to mention Whitner is a douche. Actually if I had to pick one of the two to sign it would be POZ for depth, it's a bigger position of need (but again only at the right contract). George Wilson is the guy in my opinion. He and Byrd in the secondary in 2009 were pretty damn good. That being said they weren't stepping up to put any crushing blows on anyone but they roamed the secondary and made some great plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 No thanks. I'd prefer to clear out the guys who are overpaid and have frail egos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyd19 Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 We should resign him and Poz, simply due to the fact that both have been good players and have been developed through the organization. We have lost far too many good players over the years by letting them walk. We do not need Whitner and Poz to be Hall of Famers. We need to keep them here and for them to be productive. Then build other good to potentially great players around them through the draft. That is the only way we will contend. We won't do it trying to sign elite free agents to fill gaps in talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts