uticaclub Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT **** : 535 878 5739 60.9 6.54 25 27 65 76.8 PISS: 424 734 4104 57.8 5.59 21 27 68 67.7 **** : 535 878 5739 60.9 6.54 25 27 65 76.8 PISS: 424 734 4104 57.8 5.59 21 27 68 67.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddog69 Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 Stats are for losers. Which one is a winner and a leader? That's the one I would chose and that definitely isn't Trent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 #2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddog69 Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 I'd take this one over anything we have now: 558 942 6211 59.2 6.6 87 33 34 103 75.6 It's JP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 Stats are for losers. Which one is a winner and a leader? That's the one I would chose and that definitely isn't Trent. Only a loser wouldn't use stats, to some degree. But stats w/o context are fairly useless...just like words like "winner" and "leader". An intelligent analysis requires looking at more than one thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CookieG Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 Give me the guy that led his offense to 5 TD drives in his last 7 starts. Damn...that sucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowery4 Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 2-5 vrs 4-4 I take 4-4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uticaclub Posted September 23, 2010 Author Share Posted September 23, 2010 i was just comparing that both qbs really are pretty terrible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macaroni Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 IMHO .... The QB "game plan" for this year is not to necessarily see which one of the three will be our "QB of the future" but to try and pick at least one that will make the roster next year. No way do we get three new QBs in one year so the "brain trust" has to see who is coachable and who isn't. As much as it pains me (I really wanted to see Trent do well) I think Edwards got voted off the island this week because of his inability to chuck the rock downfield .... I know ... I know ... I know ... we had tape of his performances from the last few years and should have known .... but I think this coaching staff just HAD to see if they could coach him up & work some magic, and it took two games for them to decide no matter what they did or said to Trent either can not, or will not, mend his ways. Now for phase two the staff will see how "coachable" Fitz is .... if they can fix a thing or two he gets to stay ... if not ... he joins Trent in the cast off line and it's Brohm's turn to see if he can remedy some of his flaws. But I really think at this point they are looking to see if our #2, #3 QB is currently on the roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbonestake Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 Dog turd vs. Cat Turd...which would you rather eat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpberr Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 I'll take C) The quarterback that does not run out of bounds on 4th and 11 down by a ton of points in the 4th quarter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 Jeff Garcia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeMonkey Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 Stats are for losers. Which one is a winner and a leader? That's the one I would chose and that definitely isn't Trent. So Tebow then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BfloBillsFan Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 Dog turd vs. Cat Turd...which would you rather eat? Depends on Breed of dog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbonestake Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 Depends on Breed of dog Good point. I did not specify. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clippers of Nfl Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT **** : 535 878 5739 60.9 6.54 25 27 65 76.8 PISS: 424 734 4104 57.8 5.59 21 27 68 67.7 **** : 535 878 5739 60.9 6.54 25 27 65 76.8 PISS: 424 734 4104 57.8 5.59 21 27 68 67.7 i select "is your name trent?" "yes sir, thanks, so much" "sit down trent. i'll take the other guy" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 stats w/o context are fairly useless Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillsMagic1 Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 I'll take C) The quarterback that does not run out of bounds on 4th and 11 down by a ton of points in the 4th quarter. You Play to Win the Game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berngreen Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 Fred jackson or cj spiller, we'd b better off using neither and running the wildcat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 What is PISS: ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts