Tsaikotic Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 PFT Shaun Rogers could be a good NT for a few years while a draft pick develops...wonder what pick they would want or maybe a player we have for him...Whitner and a 6th and 7th maybe?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrobot Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 Do we have a RD2 or OLine guy or QB? 'Cause that's what they'd want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 We should do a Chris Spielman type trade and they send us Rogers for Past Considerations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkc Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 Do we have a RD2 or OLine guy or QB? 'Cause that's what they'd want. i don't think they want high pick , they got him for a third and the bloom is off the rose. I bet 4th gets it done. That said he is not the answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 A fourth or lower would be ok with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thoner7 Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 This was confirmed by ESPN. They are actively seeking to trade him is what I took from it. We need help Buddy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 I would hope that we would at least explore the possibility. In my little imaginary world, a 5th and Donte would be ideal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paup 1995MVP Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 i don't think they want high pick , they got him for a third and the bloom is off the rose. I bet 4th gets it done. That said he is not the answer Why is he not the answer? The guy is big, can move reasonably for a man his size, and has a bad attitude. He certainly IS part of the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freester Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 Why is he not the answer? The guy is big, can move reasonably for a man his size, and has a bad attitude. He certainly IS part of the answer. Shaun Rogers would be a great signing. I would trade Whitner and McCargo for him in a heartbeat. We need bigger LB and D Line to play a 3-4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_red Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 No, I don't want to trade for him he is what 31 now? Plus there is a reason they want to move him the back-up played a lot better than he did, plus they traded their starting DE away they will just move Rogers over to DE imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkc Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 I would hope that we would at least explore the possibility. In my little imaginary world, a 5th and Donte would be ideal I like that world Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 PFT Shaun Rogers could be a good NT for a few years while a draft pick develops...wonder what pick they would want or maybe a player we have for him...Whitner and a 6th and 7th maybe?? Depends on George Edwards' vision of the 3-4. Rogers is a load, but he is not a typical two-gap NT. He will draw a lot of double teams and make some plays in the backfield. But if you have a NT like Rogers, you probably need some large, powerful ILB's to pick up some of that gap responsibility. Poz doesn't really fit that description, but I'm not sure Poz is all that great of a fit in any kind of 3-4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tasmo Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 Why is he not the answer? The guy is big, can move reasonably for a man his size, and has a bad attitude. He certainly IS part of the answer. Deep class this year in the draft. Guys a freelancer from a losing team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrobot Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 Depends on George Edwards' vision of the 3-4. Rogers is a load, but he is not a typical two-gap NT. He will draw a lot of double teams and make some plays in the backfield. But if you have a NT like Rogers, you probably need some large, powerful ILB's to pick up some of that gap responsibility. Poz doesn't really fit that description, but I'm not sure Poz is all that great of a fit in any kind of 3-4. Finally a reason to draft Spikes in RD2! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilcape Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 Rogers is a huge nasty man. 6-4, 350.....he can plug some holes. Yes i know he is almost 31, but he can still be a force for another 3-4 years, then still be a veteran backup for a couple years past that. The guy has blocked a boat-load of PATS and field goals. I would love to trade DW and a 6th for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sllib olaffub Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 It'd be a lot easier to say "no, don't bother with this guy" if we knew that the F.O. had a real plan for the draft - in the sense that they believe they can fill their holes with it. If they did believe that, then I'd understand not pursuing any of these options, but, if they are thinking that they'll just let the holes remain until next year - whatever they can't fill this year in the draft - basically saying we'll be o.k. with losing this year because we'll have next years draft, too - kinda like counting two drafts and forgetting about this year - then forget it, they should be looking to add some playmakers at need spots. As a fan, I'm not feeling good about the prospects of sitting through a miserable, uncompetitive year so they can have another draft to "rebuild". Hopefully they plan on fielding a competitive team this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 No, I don't want to trade for him he is what 31 now? Plus there is a reason they want to move him the back-up played a lot better than he did, plus they traded their starting DE away they will just move Rogers over to DE imo. Only the finest for us. I'll take nothing short of Wilfork w/ Dan Williams and Cody competing to be his backup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthICE Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 I say for a 4th or lower then I get him, if they want a 1-3 forget it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Lightning Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 I say for a 4th or lower then I get him, if they want a 1-3 forget it +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 Guys a freelancer from a losing team. So was Leigh Bodden Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts