Jump to content

Bills cut 7 players


turftoe

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

so what's the point of cutting these guys now?

 

Their salaries don't vest until the 1st regular season game.

 

why cut them now when their replacements are nowhere to be seen?

 

Typical Bills front office creating holes for no good reason.

 

 

What holes do these cuts create? A 5th string safety our 4th best te....Ashlee Palmer really. St's players come and go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excelling at special teams doesn't necessarily translate into positional success. Just look at Steve Tasker or Larry Izzo.

Steve Tasker is not really a good example, though your point is well taken.

 

Long time Bills fans remember and know that Steve Tasker finally got his long overdue opportunity to play from scrimmage for the Bills in two of his last NFL seasons, in 1995-96. He played as a slot receiver in 21 games and started 10 of those games.

 

Tasker was uncoverable as a slot receiver (think Wes Welker...they are the exact same size...25 pounds heavier than Roscoe Parrish BTW...and both are from the Kansas-Oklahoma area) and was used frequently on end arounds from the slot.

 

Tasker ran precise routes and got in and out of his cuts in the blink of an eye. He also had excellent hands. In those two seasons Tasker had 41 receptions for 627 yards (15.3 ypr) and 6 TDs as the Bills' 3rd/4th receiver. In those two seasons he also rushed the ball 17 times for a 6.5 ypc on the slot receiver end around play.

 

It is clear to those who saw him play from scrimmage that Marv made a mistake in restricting Tasker to special teams coverage duty only. Not only that but Marv didn't allow Tasker to return punts during his career, only relenting for the final three years of their careers (Tasker and Levy both retired after the 1997 season). Tasker averaged 10.5 yards per punt return over his last three years which were the only years he was ever used as a punt returner.

 

Considering how effective an offensive weapon Tasker was in the 3 years before his retirement, it's a damn shame he never got any offensive or special teams touches in his first 8 seasons with the Bills when he was in his athletic prime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As others mentioned, one reason these players may have been cut was to give them a better chance at catching on with another team.

 

Palmer is a bit of a surprise. I thought he played really well on ST toward the end of last season, and he was playing well enough at LB to get on the field in some situations. Maybe the coaches thought he was a bad fit for the new system. Also keep in mind there's a major roster logjam at OLB. Possibly as many as 10 players on the current roster would be on that depth chart if camp opened today.

 

Wendling got cut because he can't play S at all. He got on the field a little bit late in the week 4 Miami game. I went back and watched that, and he was just brutal. He was so bad the next time the Bills had to deal with S depth issues, they had Nic Harris practice there, so they could use him instead of Wendling. That's a sure-fire way to get yourself cut. If you are so bad at your position they have players at other positions taking practice reps in front of you, then you probably don't deserve your roster spot.

 

If the coaches decided they never expect Jenkins to develop into a WR that will get anything resembling regular playing time, then it makes sense to cut him too.

 

Someone suggested that Marcus Smith could have played NT in the 3-4. I looked up his measurements, and he's something like 6-3 295. So he appears to be too small for NT. Based on what I read, Smith, McGhee, and Phillip were all basically roster fodder that suffered season-ending injuries in training camp last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve Tasker is not really a good example, though your point is well taken.

 

Long time Bills fans remember and know that Steve Tasker finally got his long overdue opportunity to play from scrimmage for the Bills in two of his last NFL seasons, in 1995-96. He played as a slot receiver in 21 games and started 10 of those games.

 

Tasker was uncoverable as a slot receiver (think Wes Welker...they are the exact same size...25 pounds heavier than Roscoe Parrish BTW...and both are from the Kansas-Oklahoma area) and was used frequently on end arounds from the slot.

 

Tasker ran precise routes and got in and out of his cuts in the blink of an eye. He also had excellent hands. In those two seasons Tasker had 41 receptions for 627 yards (15.3 ypr) and 6 TDs as the Bills' 3rd/4th receiver. In those two seasons he also rushed the ball 17 times for a 6.5 ypc on the slot receiver end around play.

 

It is clear to those who saw him play from scrimmage that Marv made a mistake in restricting Tasker to special teams coverage duty only. Not only that but Marv didn't allow Tasker to return punts during his career, only relenting for the final three years of their careers (Tasker and Levy both retired after the 1997 season). Tasker averaged 10.5 yards per punt return over his last three years which were the only years he was ever used as a punt returner.

 

Considering how effective an offensive weapon Tasker was in the 3 years before his retirement, it's a damn shame he never got any offensive or special teams touches in his first 8 seasons with the Bills when he was in his athletic prime.

IMO Tasker was limited to his ST role for most of his career primarily because he was so good at it.

 

Jim Kelly has said that he thought Tasker could have been a Pro Bowl WR if he played there his entire career.

 

Tasker was a damn good football player, period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The reshaping of Buffalo’s roster has begun in earnest as they waived seven players Tuesday. The Bills announced the release of TE Derek Fine, DE Jermaine McGhee, LB Ashlee Palmer, DT Marcus Smith, S John Wendling, WR Justin Jenkins and C Marvin Philip."

 

 

Great! There really is a new direction @ OBD!

 

Wendling, Fine & Jenkins represent everything bad about the Bills talent level over the past few seasons. Hell, all of 'em do.

Spot on. Wendling had to go. Fine is another example of a wasted draft pick. Most people thought he could have been a FA signing after the draft and they wasted a 4th round pick on him. That could have been a starting guard, a true NFL sized LB, a center, or another project player for either DT or OT.

 

I would bet none of these guys even see an NFL camp this Summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish Steve Tasker had played about 8 years worth of WR for the Bills. I think he could have been better than Wes Welker if he'd played the WR position from day 1.

 

Anyone else remember the Dolphins game where he had 3 reverses for about 90 yards? I think that was also the game where he made Bryan Cox so crazy that Cox lost his mind and was thrown out of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excelling at special teams doesn't necessarily translate into positional success. Just look at Steve Tasker or Larry Izzo.

 

If you recall, Tasker was a serviceable receiver late in his career. Early on, with Marv Levys' emphasis on special teams play, Tasker wasn't asked/needed as an offensive player. When the receiving corp grew old, and thin, Tasker wasn't bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO Tasker was limited to his ST role for most of his career primarily because he was so good at it.

 

Jim Kelly has said that he thought Tasker could have been a Pro Bowl WR if he played there his entire career.

 

Tasker was a damn good football player, period.

 

 

+10 :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the Lady. ST has been our best unit over the last few years and we just cut 2 "starters".

 

Since neither Jenkins or Wendling has started a game in the past 3 years, I fail to see how "These guys took spots from 2nd and 3rd stringers that could have provided depth when starters were injured."

 

Fine has more NFL starts than Maybin and Ellis combined. Sure, he's been hurt but he can probably make it through an off-season without injury.

 

I am all for improving the overall talent level but I don't think replacing our #6 WR. #6 safety and #4 TE is going to make any difference.

 

 

these guys (outside of Fine) aren't even back ups at their positions. When the starters got hurt we signed scrap heap guys to play on offense and defense over these guys. So getting ST players that may contribute somewhere else really upgrades the roster and those positions may be replaced with guys that can compete with other players.

 

Corto should be next

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...