/dev/null Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jan/3...s-missiles-gulf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kegtapr Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Bush is just looking for a fight. Oh......wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jan/3...s-missiles-gulf Obama's on the job training continues. He's quickly learning that there is a gigantic difference between theory studied in an environment like Harvard and the real world. Good news that we're taking this action toward Iran's threats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Damn Bush, Damn him to hell with all his defense spending, wait, nevermind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Bush is just looking for a fight. Oh......wait. Yeah because invading a sovereign nation so you can be a wartime president is virtually identical to delivering defensive weapons systems to our allies. Obama bad! Damn Bush, Damn him to hell with all his defense spending, wait, nevermind. For a group of cheerleaders who complain about the current administration's references to Bush, you gals sure do talk about Bush a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Yeah because invading a sovereign nation so you can be a wartime president is virtually identical to delivering defensive weapons systems to our allies.Obama bad! Like the ABM system in Eastern Europe - oh, wait, he's killing that. Half-assed foreign policy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Like the ABM system in Eastern Europe - oh, wait, he's killing that. Half-assed foreign policy. Does that thing even work? I have no idea. And is the admins decision to scrap it or move forward (in)directly related to Iran? Seems like a whole lotta balls in the air right now. Probably a good time to start working on a comprehensive gun control policy..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 For a group of cheerleaders who complain about the current administration's references to Bush, you gals sure do talk about Bush a lot. Oh Silly Simon, shouldn't you be off somewhere picking your nose? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle_chappy Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 3 words-wag the dog. anything to get our minds of the economy, eh barry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Like the ABM system in Eastern Europe - oh, wait, he's killing that. There were well reasoned arguments for why he did that. It's not like he shook the magic 8-ball and it told him to take it down. That decision was the result of research and reports and assessments on what other options were available. I'm sure this information is available somewhere. He did speak on it at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Yeah because invading a sovereign nation so you can be a wartime president is virtually identical to delivering defensive weapons systems to our allies.Obama bad! Wait a second...the left went batshcitt over maneuvers like this for decades. NOW, its ok? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 There were well reasoned arguments for why he did that. It's not like he shook the magic 8-ball and it told him to take it down. That decision was the result of research and reports and assessments on what other options were available. I'm sure this information is available somewhere. He did speak on it at the time. Just like your answer in the Corporate Justice thread, basically you got nothin. There is absolutely nothing of substance in your answer, well I guess that goes without saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 I'm sure this information is available somewhere. Then I'm sure you'll have no problem in finding it and offering a coherent rationale for the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 There were well reasoned arguments for why he did that. It's not like he shook the magic 8-ball and it told him to take it down. That decision was the result of research and reports and assessments on what other options were available. I'm sure this information is available somewhere. He did speak on it at the time. Yes, it's called "Please, Russia, like us again." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Yes, it's called "Please, Russia, like us again." for the win.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 I'm confident that Iran is just too busy organizing fund-raisers and sending relief supplies and MD's to Haiti to EVER plan for something bad to happen in the Middle East.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts