Magox Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/13/acorn-...in-your-pocket/ ACORN SUES TO PUT ITS HANDS BACK IN YOUR POCKET Just imagine this scene: an organization is on trial in at least one state for voter registration fraud, accused of voter registration fraud in more than a dozen states, is accused of being a “criminal enterprise” by a Congressional report, and is exposed in a half-dozen states as aiding a supposed pimp and prostitute to obtain a home under false pretenses and use it for admittedly illegal purposes. And that organization then sues the federal government to restart its flow of our money. It makes me think of that insulting JG Wentworth commercial when people are leaning out windows and shouting, “It’s my money and I need it now!” dumbasses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/13/acorn-...in-your-pocket/ ACORN SUES TO PUT ITS HANDS BACK IN YOUR POCKET Just imagine this scene: an organization is on trial in at least one state for voter registration fraud, accused of voter registration fraud in more than a dozen states, is accused of being a “criminal enterprise” by a Congressional report, and is exposed in a half-dozen states as aiding a supposed pimp and prostitute to obtain a home under false pretenses and use it for admittedly illegal purposes. And that organization then sues the federal government to restart its flow of our money. It makes me think of that insulting JG Wentworth commercial when people are leaning out windows and shouting, “It’s my money and I need it now!” dumbasses Man, if you get this fired up over Acorn taking your money, you must truly hate those a-holes at Haliburton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 14, 2009 Author Share Posted November 14, 2009 Man, if you get this fired up over Acorn taking your money, you must truly hate those a-holes at Haliburton. oh looky, it's another liberal with hurt feelings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 oh looky, it's another liberal with hurt feelings Oh looky another racist !@#$ who can't stay on topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 14, 2009 Author Share Posted November 14, 2009 Oh looky another racist !@#$ who can't stay on topic. racist? because they are fraudulent and give advice in how to set up underage prostitution homes? you sir are pathetic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 racist? because they are fraudulent and give advice in how to set up underage prostitution homes? you sir, are pathetic Reciprocated name-calling. You sir, are predictable. Way to defend your brokeass bogus biases against Acorn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 14, 2009 Author Share Posted November 14, 2009 Reciprocated name-calling. You sir, are predictable. Way to defend your brokeass bogus biases against Acorn. bogus? : right. So, just like the Ft hood incident, you denied what everyone else knew, and now you are denying that ACORN was involved in illegal activities. you truly are a liberal !@#$tard. I know I get under your skin, and every time I post something your panties tend to get all up in a bunch, but just relax, smoke a spliff, watch an episode of South Park and share with us what life lesson you just learned and then get back to us. Think of it like ' Show and tell' like when you were in school. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 bogus? : right. So, just like the Ft hood incident, you denied what everyone else knew, and now you are denying that ACORN was involved in illegal activities. you truly are a liberal !@#$tard. I know I get under your skin, and every time I post something your panties tend to get all up in a bunch, but just relax, smoke a spliff, watch an episode of South Park and share with us what life lesson you just learned and then get back to us. Think of it like ' Show and tell' like when you were in school. Denying ACORN was involved in illegal activities? Priceless. Aren't they missing you at today's Birther's Rally? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 Denying ACORN was involved in illegal activities? Priceless. Aren't they missing you at today's Birther's Rally? Is there something wrong with you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 14, 2009 Author Share Posted November 14, 2009 Denying ACORN was involved in illegal activities? Priceless. Aren't they missing you at today's Birther's Rally? So I point out facts, and the best you got is calling me "racist" and a "birther". I'll take that as an admission of "I've got nuthin" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 So I point out facts, and the best you got is calling me "racist" and a "birther". I'll take that as an admission of "I've got nuthin" You point out a hand picked selection of facts that support your preconceived notions. You fail to mention or bring up any facts that would disagree with you. Now. Tell us why you are pissed about money going to Acorn, and not pissed Haliburton taking taxpayer money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 15, 2009 Share Posted November 15, 2009 So I point out facts, and the best you got is calling me "racist" and a "birther". I'll take that as an admission of "I've got nuthin" ACORN does have a pretty good point...Congress stripped them of funds as a de facto punishment for wrong-doing, which may very well be a bill of attainder and hence unconstitutional. I suppose the real question is: is it a bill of attainder if Congress takes away what Congress originally granted? I really don't know have an answer to that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 15, 2009 Share Posted November 15, 2009 You point out a hand picked selection of facts that support your preconceived notions. You fail to mention or bring up any facts that would disagree with you. Now. Tell us why you are pissed about money going to Acorn, and not pissed Haliburton taking taxpayer money? They are two different situations. Of course, you are really too much of a moron to understand the difference between "grants" and "payments for services rendered." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 15, 2009 Author Share Posted November 15, 2009 ACORN does have a pretty good point...Congress stripped them of funds as a de facto punishment for wrong-doing, which may very well be a bill of attainder and hence unconstitutional. I suppose the real question is: is it a bill of attainder if Congress takes away what Congress originally granted? I really don't know have an answer to that one. Oh, I know they have a "case", but I still found it funny. At the end of the day, their days are numbered from receiving the type of federal funds that they are use to. Even most liberals are smart enough to distance themselves from this corrupt organization. It's been rather enjoyable watching them have their asses handed to them publicly, and the liberals scurrying away from them as if they were the black plague. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 15, 2009 Author Share Posted November 15, 2009 They are two different situations. Of course, you are really too much of a moron to understand the difference between "grants" and "payments for services rendered." I didn't even try explaining the difference to the two of them, it is pretty clear that they both have no clue what they are talking about when retard #1 said "Man, if you get this fired up over Acorn taking your money, you must truly hate those a-holes at Haliburton." and retard #2 then says "Tell us why you are pissed about money going to Acorn, and not pissed Haliburton taking taxpayer money?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 15, 2009 Share Posted November 15, 2009 I didn't even try explaining the difference to the two of them, it is pretty clear that they both have no clue what they are talking about when retard #1 said "Man, if you get this fired up over Acorn taking your money, you must truly hate those a-holes at Haliburton." and retard #2 then says "Tell us why you are pissed about money going to Acorn, and not pissed Haliburton taking taxpayer money?" Alternately, one could suggest that if these guys were THAT pissed about Haliburton, they must be REALLY pissed off about ACORN. But no. That concept ricochets off their noggins like their oxygen-depleted brains are protected by a common sense deflector shield. Idiots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted November 15, 2009 Share Posted November 15, 2009 Oh looky another racist !@#$ who can't stay on topic. Oh, and bringing up Haliburton is staying on topic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 15, 2009 Share Posted November 15, 2009 Oh, and bringing up Haliburton is staying on topic? About as on topic as calling somebody a racist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted November 15, 2009 Share Posted November 15, 2009 Topics! CLAP CLAP Topics! CLAP CLAP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 15, 2009 Share Posted November 15, 2009 Reciprocated name-calling. You sir, are predictable. Way to defend your brokeass bogus biases against Acorn. And you asked me in another thread why I assumed you were liberal? I guess its your whole mountain of work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StupidNation Posted November 15, 2009 Share Posted November 15, 2009 Uhm.. Magox.. who do your loyalties fall to first.. the USA, or the Republican party? Because if you answered the USA, you may want to learn about the concepts of bills of attainder, balance of powers, and also due process. If you answered Republican party, then by all means, go on ignoring the constitution and legal procedure. Wrong. 1st the Constitution never was supposed to fund individual companies to begin with, that was never it's intent. Congress had no right to do so in the 1st place. Why not learn original intent in law. Maybe your loyalties exist with the Democrat party. I don't support either of them since they both break the law in this and in many other regards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Hedd Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Sometimes I find the gall of ACORN astounding Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Sometimes I find the gall of ACORN astounding Really? Why should we not be galled by an organization that mis-uses federal funds and participates in voter fraud? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 25, 2009 Author Share Posted November 25, 2009 Really? Why should we not be galled by an organization that mis-uses federal funds and participates in voter fraud? what sort of response are you expecting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Really? Why should we not be galled by an organization that mis-uses federal funds and participates in voter registration fraud? If this dialogue is to move forward, we must acknowledge the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 If this dialogue is to move forward, we must acknowledge the difference. It's like you go out of your way to sound like someone's wife. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 25, 2009 Author Share Posted November 25, 2009 Really? Why should we not be galled by an organization that mis-uses federal funds and participates in voter fraud? I think when Big C says he wants to "move the dialogue further", he was referring to something as substantive as this: http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?...t&p=1632375 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 I think when Big C says he wants to "move the dialogue further", he was referring to something as substantive as this: http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?...t&p=1632375 I have a very hard time with artsy fartsy libs like the cat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 I have a very hard time with artsy fartsy libs like the cat. I don't expect you to understand my artsy fartsy responses, just like I don't expect Magott to understand why I called him a racist, regardless of whether or not he can't get over his own thwarted interpretation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 I don't expect you to understand my artsy fartsy responses, just like I don't expect Magott to understand why I called him a racist, regardless of whether or not he can't get over his own thwarted interpretation. Why is he a racist, again? I haven't been paying attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Why is he a racist, again? I haven't been paying attention. He's not. I just thought I'd up the ante once the names started flying. Plus, it's laughably cliche to call someone opposed to ACORN a "racist." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 He's not. I just thought I'd up the ante once the names started flying. Plus, it's laughably cliche to call someone opposed to ACORN a "racist." Ahhh, okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 I have a very hard time with artsy fartsy libs like the cat. Did you know that a male lion "lasts" only about 30 seconds when mating? Big roar, known to eat its own and lick his own balls and a$$, but just doesn't come through in the clutch! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Did you know that a male lion "lasts" only about 30 seconds when mating? Big roar, known to eat its own and lick his own balls and a$$, but just doesn't come through in the clutch! Yeah, see I don't normally measure myself against my fellow males' sexual stamina. In fact, with us artsy farts types, it's a subject that rarely comes up. Other than that, yeah, I agree, lions are the joke of the animal kingdom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 He's not. I just thought I'd up the ante once the names started flying. Plus, it's laughably cliche to call someone opposed to ACORN a "racist." I thought it had something to do with black tacos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 I thought it had something to do with black tacos. the blacker the berries, the sweeter the juice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Yeah, see I don't normally measure myself against my fellow males' sexual stamina. In fact, with us artsy farts types, it's a subject that rarely comes up. Other than that, yeah, I agree, lions are the joke of the animal kingdom. So, I can assume that you are a male now and can eliminate the he/she references when referring to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 I think I need more butter-flavored chemicals in my popcorn- this is getting good, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 So, I can assume that you are a male now and can eliminate the he/she references when referring to you? That's up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 25, 2009 Author Share Posted November 25, 2009 He's not. I just thought I'd up the ante once the names started flying. Plus, it's laughably cliche to call someone opposed to ACORN a "racist." now it's "laughably cliche", I get it, so what happened to chalking it up as " employed irony"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts