MDH

I don't think I could drink a glass of whole milk without wanting to puke.

This is my favorite part. Is he really bitching about last year? Once the Bills hog-tied him they were able to have some success and would have made the playoffs had he and the D not folded against Pittsburgh (you can add Lindel in there too if you'd like). I guess he's more concerned about his pretty little stats than actually winning games, because after reigning him in the Bills actually won more than they lost. It also made our front office realize that any QB can be a caretaker with this D and ST, which I guess is the real problem Bledsoe had with it.

Yep, Brady would immediately make us one of the favorites in the AFC, if not the favorite.

Thank you for your incredible contribution to the board. If you're going to be a dick, at least be entertaining or witty. Thanks for the report Simon, there are plenty here that appreciate your efforts.

Not that I disagree with you, I just thought it was funny as hell that somebody has said the line "then its time for a new QB" regarding JP when the guy hasn't started a single regular season game yet.

How many QBs who haven't even started a single NFL regular season game and have 5 passes on their regular season resume have only good things? In the history of the NFL I don't think there has been one.

Because Losman represents hope for most fans and people don't want to believe there is no hope for this team.

Boller is 2 games above .500 as a starter. This with one of the best O-lines, running games, and D's in the league. That's just pathetic. In that situation all you have to do is no !@#$ up and your team wins, but Boller can't even manage that. The "inexperienced" excuse is gone now, he's started 25+ games for the Ravens. The guy needs to produce now or he'll end up a career backup.

Are you assuming a Losman injury? Because, barring injury, I'd lay cash on the table saying you're prediction won't come to pass...and I don't even have that much confidence that Losman won't struggle mightily this year. I just don't think the club will pull him when he does.

I guess your standards for "quality" journalism are lower than mine if you think doing a bit of research for a comparison equates to a "PhD dissertation" and isn't needed for a simple article in a newspaper. To each his own.

I have to disagree; he only partly earned his paycheck. Its easy to look at the Bills schedule and say "hey, who did they play", but unless you're going to actually compare it to the other top flight D's in the league, you've done a half-assed job. I'd also disagree with you about "if he elicits a reaction from you...then Sullivan has earned his paycheck." Any idiot with a strong opinion can elicit a reaction from the general public, its not tough to do. The trick is to actually make the public think and, perhaps, question their own opinions. Sullivan rarely does that because his arguments aren't generally that well thought out.

I just don't see it happening. He wants to be paid like the best CB in the league (which he's not). Personally, I prefer not paying any one position that much cash, no matter how good the player is.

The prevent D isn't what cost the Oilers that game. It was the run and shoot. They didn't run the ball often enough to take time off the clock. A lot of 3 and outs when you're throwing the ball means that not much time is going off the clock. Its actually the opposite of going into a shell that cost them that game. Had they gone into a shell they would have won.

That jersey looks like you could fit 5 of him in it.

Yeah, I think people forget how good he was. For a few seasons he was right up there with Ray Lewis as the top LB in the game. It's a shame how his career turned out.

If it was just for one year I'd take Pennington. All things considered I'd probably have to roll the dice and go with Losman.

See: Exception to the rule.

Hell, if a coach goes for 2 points with more than 7-8 minutes left its almost always a mistake.

I'm not going to argue that Henry can pass block as well as Willis, but to attribute a turnaround that large to one player is over doing it. It could be possible that Mularky identified problems and instituted changes that would fix the problem, but we wouldn't want to give the head coach credit...

And why isn't MM responsible for McGahee "grasping things" and Evans "getting it?" You can try to give credit to other coaches all you want (Grey, April) but the head coaches job isn't just the offense, even if he came in as a offensive "guru", his job is the keep the entire team on course, to know when he should get more involved with an aspect of the team and when he should lay off. MM isn't Belichick, but to discount the job he did last year by diverting your kudos to other coaches is pretty short sighted. The Bills, even with that craptacular performance against Pittsburgh finished the season 8-2. That’s a pretty good job for a rookie coach.

Yes, because dissenting opinions must be silenced...

Switch our QBs and the Bills would win the division this year, easily. So you can go on thinking there's a huge gap between the two teams, but there's not.

I thought this was pretty hysterical. This chick is smart

All this is true. Warhammer is very expensive, if you want a game that's just as good (if not better) and has miniatures that are less expensive, try WarMachine.

Actually, I have to agree with Greybeard. Ice would be defending JP up and down durning the first, oh, 5 weeks of the season. By week 6 he'd be saying what a total POS this guy is and Holcomb should be playing.