Azalin

That phrase is golden.

No habla corndog?

It wasn't UN sanctions that were being violated, it was conditions of the cease-fire from the first gulf war.

You can wait until we discuss police profiling if you want to know about that. We're talking about your penchant for mischaracterizing people who hold differing opinions than yours, and the intellectual dishonesty in doing so.

You can call it polling or anything else you want, but that won't make it any more accurate. You're stereotyping people who disagree with you, and implying that they are scientifically ignorant, when they don't know any less about the issue than you do.

Surely you don't mean to imply that they're not interested in learning the truth of the matter - that in fact their minds are already made up?

I'm not particularly religious, I'm not a republican, and I'm significantly more libertarian than conservative, yet I'm a climate change skeptic. Why do believers in man-made climate change continue to presume any who disagree with them are outright deniers, and are automatically classified as religious and republican? Isn't that kind of like saying all african-americans are rappers?

coastal?

What the hell are you yacking about now? If I was defending anyone, it was you. Greg continues to try to have an honest discussion with you, which is clearly a waste of time. You're just too damned stupid.

Not at all - you're goading some pretty entertaining stuff out of him. That, sir, is community service.

You pretty much have to have some idea of what it is that you're talking about in order to be honest when discussing it, so no. He's not anywhere near capable of being honest while discussing stuff like this. See below. This is a perfect example of all you're ever going to get from this guy. Do you remember pajama boy - the snottly little lib wearing a onesie? They use the same technique in "debating" (note the quotation marks) - any kind of reply, no matter how inane, irrevelant, or scatological is adequate. You don't lose an argument unless you stop replying. Watching you try to get any kind of reasonable answer out of Gator is akin to watching Neil Degrasse Tyson discuss astrophysics with a corn dog.

Not necessarily - it's a mundane occurance as far as the Clintons are concerned.

That is an insult to 14 year-olds everywhere.

At least you're honest about it.

"For profit medicine"? I was talking about donations from private citizens to build, equip, and staff more medical facilities.

So we'd all be better off without it?

You make it sound as if charitable contributions are only genuine if applied the way you would prefer them to be.

They would if they could, but they can't, so they don't.

I would think that a member of the medical community would see major cash donations put toward any such endeavors as a good thing. Apparently not.

I don't watch Hannity at all. Your friends at the NSA could have told you that.

The volunteer fire fighters around here refer to motorcyclists as 'organ donors'.

Pretty much sums it up.

Now you're just obfuscating. Next you'll be bringing facts into it.