Talk about solidly landing in the clueless column - he hasn't dismissed the connection between between drug abuse and theft, he just doesn't automatically presume that all drug users are thieves, which you are apparently doing. And you have never heard of non-violent criminals? The thing that makes me laugh is that you are automatically associating theft with all drug use, and violence with all crime, and then telling Tasker that he needs to 'scratch below the surface', as if you're the one who's actually doing any kind of nuanced thinking. What you're doing is painting with a very broad brush, and if the justice system worked the way your logic does, then kids getting busted for a bag of weed would automatically be charged with larceny as well.
You face disagreement with your thought process, so what do you do? You apply the exact same 'logic', lumping everyone else as being 'misguided', '15 years old', or 'unemployed', only because your shallow intellect and limited thought process is unable to compute any of this. Which, once again, is exactly what you're accusing Tasker of doing.