Jump to content

Fezmid

Community Member
  • Posts

    14,348
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fezmid

  1. They're playing kinda dirty with the WRs as well... Hitting them after the play, shoving 'em around. I wish the refs would throw a flag on the Steelers; 15 yards should make Cower tell them to stop it. CW
  2. Pretty deep pass, and now he's probably out. Tough shot to the knee. CW
  3. Right, becuase our offense got so much better once he left and was replaced with an offensive coach.
  4. Just give it to 'em!
  5. That was actually the correct call. You HAVE to keep control of the ball when you hit the ground nowadays. That rule was instituted a year or two ago. It's the whole "football move" thing. CW
  6. I was pointing out the fact that it was a PASS. Everyone here would've screamed for a running play, and called to fire our coach if we didn't. CW
  7. 4th and 1, Bucs go for a pass and fail. Gruden must suck, huh? CW
  8. Agreed.
  9. Shouldn't matter though. Even if that's true, shouldn't it be offsetting?!?!
  10. He coaches in the AFC East... Not exactly a powerhouse. 'Nuff said. CW
  11. Better Walmart article: http://www.denverpost.com/ci_3371815?source=rss CW
  12. Actually, you're (most likely) incorrect. The searching software uses "semantic indexing," linking words together based on potential meaning. We've seen this sort of thing where I work since we have large databases full of information and also use a semantic indexing search application. You type in one thing, and get something completely unreleated (in your mind) to the original search. My theory would be that the index had some sort of book/movie/article linking Apes to African Americans through evolution or something similar. Nobody's going in and manually saying "This movie is like this movie, and this book is like this book." Cna you imagine how tedious that would be? And there's little chance that someone short circuited the search application - that'd be near impossible to do (especially without being noticed), and if someone DID do it, why wouldn't Walmart have fired the person on the spot and hung them out to dry? Walmart does a lot of stupid things, but I'm pretty sure this isn't one of them. In fact, the person is wrong -- the searching WAS working correctly, it just had bad linking inside the relevance matrix. CW
  13. How did BB get two votes?! Dungy was second place in the voting. Go Bears, go Reuben Brown. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2283709 CW
  14. Oooh yeah, that. I noticed it in the show, guess I didn't in the movie. I'll have to pay attention next time I watch it. CW
  15. That's what happens when you have less than $40M to make a Holleywood feature film nowadays. Audiences are used to the $100M special effects. And very good point about the ship -- Serenity is like another character, and that's done intentionally. They make several references if you watch the commentary, that they wanted to give the ship life. CW
  16. Great, so THEY'RE allowed to look back to give the team a goal, but in the NHL, even after you prove a puck goes THROUGH the netting, it still counts because "We already dropped the puck." Not that I'm still bitter or anything. CW
  17. Week 5 isn't the halfway point of the season. It's not even a third of the way through the season. Oh well, what can you do? CW
  18. This article makes no sense. followed by: So the season starts in September, ends in December. Halfway point is end of October/start of November. Yet Clements was calling plays in "the final months." That means two months, meaning he called plays in November and December... So when exactly did he lose the play calling rights...? Doesn't take much to be a journalist nowadays. Don't even need facts anymore! CW
  19. Exactly. If he were scrawling "suicide bomber" on the pages during the flight, with pictures of explosions and such, I don't think I'd have a problem with him being questioned - that's just dumb on his part. But the article doesn't make it sound that way. People need to stop snooping at what others are doing and then jumping to conclusions based on what they see.
  20. So now we can't bring a journal on board if it has a word that could frighten you...? I guess I shouldn't read a review of Air Force One, since it would talk about terrorists and planes. According to the article, it was a song title, lyrics, or a band. It doesn't even sound like he wrote that while on the plane, and probably didn't think anything of it. It's all paranoia. CW
  21. http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle....E-PASSENGER.xml
  22. This is the telling part: They go on and on about Smith's great stats, and then for Tedy, they just say, "he appeared in 9 games." Not even, "He started nine games," no, just appeared. How is that a comeback player of the year? Whatever. CW
  23. He was (and is?) the only QB in TB history to win when the temperature is below 40F, and that game was important for the Bucs (although I can't remember if it won the division, clinched homefield, or what). That info on the site is a tad self-indulgent though... But that's what you do when you market yourself. CW
  24. Except I think all couch salaries are guaranteed in the NFL...
×
×
  • Create New...