| 1998 buf | 10 6 0 | 0 1 |
| 1999 buf | 11 5 0 | 0 1 |
| 2000 buf | 8 8 0 | 0 0 |
Three seasons in Buffalo, then run out of town.
| 2001 buf | 3 13 0 | 0 0 |
| 2002 buf | 8 8 0 | 0 0 |
| 2003 buf | 6 10 0 | 0 0 |
Three seasons in Buffalo, then run out of town.
| 2004 buf | 9 7 0 | 0 0 |
| 2005 buf | 5 11 0 | 0 0 |
Two seasons in Buffalo, then run out of town (for all intents and purposes)
What kind of winning program are you expected to have when you're doing major shakeups every 2-3 seasons...?
Here's Belichek's first 6 seasons in the league:
| 1991 cle | 6 10 0 | 0 0 |
| 1992 cle | 7 9 0 | 0 0 |
| 1993 cle | 7 9 0 | 0 0 |
| 1994 cle | 11 5 0 | 1 1 |
| 1995 cle | 5 11 0 | 0 0 |
| 2000 ne | 5 11 0 | 0 0 |
I don't know, I just think we need to pick someone and sitck with them for a few years. Look at Holmgren in Seattle:
| 1999 sea | 9 7 0 | 0 1 |
| 2000 sea | 6 10 0 | 0 0 |
| 2001 sea | 9 7 0 | 0 0 |
| 2002 sea | 7 9 0 | 0 0 |
| 2003 sea | 10 6 0 | 0 1 |
| 2004 sea | 9 7 0 | 0 1 |
| 2005 sea | 13 3 0 | 0 0 |
They stuck with him, and it's paying dividends.
Oh well, nothing I can do about it, so why worry about it I guess
CW