Joe Miner

65? I thought his first post was starting a thread about impeaching John Roberts. I don't think he ever gained any credibility. Let's see: Big SC healthcare decision - New Poster Duck Dodgers starts topic #1. Romney makes VP Pick - What do you know? Welcome back Duck. It's someone's alt that's out trolling again today. Give them a week and they'll have had their fun and move on to a different character. I'm sure when there is more "Big" political news, this asshat will return.

Looks like a bunch of subjective crap put together in order to sell a book. How many elections have been that hard to predict since the 1980's? 1 Maybe? You could have 10 people answer those same questions and get 10 different answers. So are the 13 Keys the important part, or are the subjective answers he gives to those keys the important part? Picking Reagan twice, Bush I once, Clinton twice, Bush II twice, and Obama once wasn't exactly rocket science. Hell, the only incumbent that didn't win in that time frame was Bush I. And Key #4 looks like it was developed specifically with Bush 1 in mind, making me wonder how he had these keys put together and used since the 80's. This is a thread based on a stupid gimmick to make money, and you shouldn't be surprised by the stupidity it's generated.

What was the topic of this thread?

Does this work as a correct answer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MHADtpEegA&feature=fvwrel

Yes, but America didn't even qualify for a medal in that event.

You betcha!

With no O-line, the refs are gonna have to be making double the calls to keep Marsha safe.

Don't limit that thought to the tax code. That's a pretty common theme for most of the gov't.

Good thing Shanny has a history of success developing QB's.

So you admit that those most likely to commit voter fraud will do so in favor of Obama.

I shouldn't be surprised by this response. This is the same thinking that says Obamacare is good because it did something. Not what it was initially intended to do (lower health care costs), but it did "work" because accomplished something (set up a framework for the future).

Once you get to redefine the definition of worked after seeing the performance of the stimulus, of course it worked. If the stimulus is your idea of something working, hopefully you never have a job in private industry. Those are not the kind of results private employers are looking for.

Lane 8 is the one that everyone pees in.

Their stick work is incredible.

To me this is the major issue. Do I think there should be come common sense applied to what it manufactured, made available, and able to be purchased? Yes. Hell, we might even agree on what that is. The difference is, I don't want my opinion, or our agreed upon opinion legislated. Because at some point the legislation is no longer based off my opinion. It's based off someone else's that I disagree with. I'm willing to deal with some dangers in society in order to not have that line drawn for me. You apparently are not, that's our real difference of opinion. All the statistics, and comparisons, and other crap isn't relevant. This is the crux of our disagreement.

So the only reason gun crimes have been increasing is due to the number of guns we have? You're wanting some kind of legislation based around a statistic without trying to figure out what the real problem is.

This is where I stopped since the rest was inevitably ignorant and likely incoherent.

What in the world does the number of guns owned have to do with anything? Instead of gun crimes per capita should we start counting gun crimes per gun? I bet the US would look pretty good in that comparison. We own a lot of guns, but a very small % are used in crimes. How is gun ownership even counted anyway? How many guns are Mexican drug cartels on the books for?

What were the facts in that article that you feel are relevant? America owns a lot of guns...and?

Thanks for the police report I mentioned !@#$wad. I'm wondering if that was what you were initially talking about or the CBS report that I'm pretty sure was referring to the non-bulletproof vest he had. But I think it's petty impossible to say what would have happened had someone returned fire. Would the vest have helped? Certainly. But who knows what he would have done had he taken a shot to his body armor, which from my understanding isn't that pleasant of a feeling.

CFA Certified for Awesomeness

I assumed that was a given since it was a constipation problem.

Step 1: Assume digestive system is a sphere Step 2: Assume the digestive system is in a vacuum At that point the problem practically solves itself.

They didn't get smart by themselves. As proven by gov't schools.

I had to provide mine. I've even seen the other idiots I work with make hiring decisions based off what one kid got in a class versus another. I do work with some real idiots thought.