The Big Cat

His "deep" TD throw to Nate Washington shows you everything you need to know.

One fourth of the way through the season and Kiko Alonso must be light years ahead of any other DROY at this point. Right?

Lee Smith, but yes. I call Hackett won't get "credit" for. Or the ensuing "touchdown" that was called back because of a split second bobble.

Yeah...but not not so good that they brought him back...

Trent Edwards? Oh yeah! Trent Edwards! Funny, I don't remember any good games, though.

Buddy. I know you didn't just use the "I know this guy who defeats your generalization" argument. C'mon. Are we not allowed to insult women because they're women? Or is it because they're people? And if it's the latter, who's going to lay down their musket first? Nobody? Great. Then everybody can remove the stick and get on with life without being "insulted" by every little thing. You don't have a stereotyped view of men or women? Then gender means nothing to you? There aren't things that men do better than women, and visa versa? Why is gender role a derogatory concept?

So women have to be taught how to get themselves off, huh?

if he becomes available. may be. before the new CBA, he was one of the highest paid players IN SPORTS...before he even took his first snap. so...not with that contract, no thanks.

I'd like him to be better, yes. But all I really care about: has he been better than Shephard? I can't imagine a reality in which he hasn't.

The one that's had the reign for 12 quarters of football now? Yes.

I'll bet your also in wth the crowd that thinks the FO is inept because they can't build depth...

Please help me understand how Byrd/Parker's strategy is a beneficial one. How do you game plan for a showdown when your opposition doesn't aspire to a logical outcome? This strikes me as a Leroooooooooooooooooooooy JEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEnkins moment.

Just think: we'd also have a Rams Bucs game too! We'd also have annual matchups between Brees and Rodgers, Brady and Manning.

This time a theme:

I mean, I could literally do this all day:

AWESOME pic. Wait...how can we ignore this part!? he National Enquirer also reported in February that Simpson has “gone gay” in prison, so these stories, while magnificent, are probably less than trustworthy. Because real talk: who would risk a stay in the SHU for oatmeal cookies? Easily the stupidest cookies out there.

OP deserves poster of the week. This has been a truly amazing thread. Hahaha.

Nice post. How bout: No divisions. No conferences. Lottery schedule. Some teams play 5 games. Some teams play 20. It's a stretch, but I'll bet we'd learn to love it.

Well, each year would swap a game against the Pats for a game against a team like Jacksonville. And a game against the Jets (who have our goat, big time) for a game against a team like Cleveland.

Looks like a big-ass gazebo. How wonderfully symbolic of the Bills, though. Sweet heart, I didn't want to show you until it was done. But, open your eyes. I built our dream home! Its a giant !@#$ing gazebo. Isn't it grand!?

hahaha, did you purposely find a building with no foundation?

I think the obvious solution, as someone alluded to would be to expand to two more teams and keep the 16 game schedule. Because seriously: what's the point of divisions? Given the original nexus for this idea (that a better team will be eliminated because of division champs): what benefit do divisions bring? As we've already established in previous threads, they're not that geographic (Miami to Boston!?), and because they comprise three extra games on your schedule, teams will get beat up by the same team year in and year out, and those teams that do the beating in a lop-sided division will come into the playoffs with an artificially good record.

But if final six comes down to record, then not everyone had a shot at the same opponents...

Yes, the home/road balance is definitely compromised. One idea I thought of to offset it is to play a single flex game every year, but that waters down the schedule fairness. Or, they'd play four in a row.