mannc

Not only did Foster have more than 100 yards receiving, he drew a 50-yard pass interference penalty that led to the Bills’ first TD. Every bit as good as a catch.

Well, I work downtown and I’ve never been harmed or even seriously inconvenienced by any of these demonstrations. I’ll grant you that the city government is a joke, but the good still outweighs the bad here...

Oh. That makes Portland bad? I’ve lived here 24 years and I’ve never encountered one of those, nor have I ever run into an Antifa. Maybe the guy from New Jersey is better informed, though.

How do you know, do you live here? And what is SJW?

Is there some reason we can’t beat both of them?

100%. It will be highly disappointing if the Bills’ first pick is used for a defender. But I would not bet against it.

Both conferences are wide open. Playoffs will be fun.

Your post said nothing about top 10. Nice try.

There were 10 trade ups in the first round last year, including several for defenders. Does the name Tremaine Edwards mean anything to you?

You mean LaGarrett Blount, former UDFA, now on his sixth or seventh NFL team?

And yet both had worse records than the Bills did before McDermott was hired. Stop making excuses.

Bet Belichick goes for 2 after the score.

Someone should be fired for cutting him earlier in the year.?

Yep. Absolutely the right call, but they’ll never do it. Play not to lose.

Yes you do!

No excuse. You probably run the ball there anyway.

Because they wanted to win?

No, it was the correct decision and it’s not close. First down and the game is over. Chance of getting first down there is about 80%. Win percentage being up 4 points after a kick off, with that much time left, is not much better than only being up 1 with the ball on the Broncs’ own 10 yard line. The math is pretty simple and compelling in favor of going for it. Except it’s not smart. It’s dumb.

The “other” option in both polls should include a trade back, which I think was the Giants’ best option. FWIW, I think Denver made a mistake not taking Allen, but the Chubb pick makes more sense than the Giants taking Barkley.

He’s certainly no bust...nor was there any chance he would be.

But Lindsey’s not really much of an outlier. Because of the position he plays, Chubb would have been a better pick than Barkley.

Nonsense. The Broncos picked up an undrafted FA who’s been as good as Barkley this year. There are always great RBs available.

He’ll be able to play next year, without a doubt. He’s never even been charged with a crime, much less convicted.

QBs are expected to struggle as rookies, and they have. Barkley has been outstanding, as expected, but he’s not going to ever perform much better. The QBs (assuming they become franchise QBs) will play much better in the next couple years and their teams will win a lot more games as a result. Barkley’s played about as well as he can and his team still hasn’t won. And it’s not at all clear that whatever QB they land will be anywhere near as good as they guys they could have had this year. Meanwhile, there is a Barkley-level RB talent available as a street free agent...

They can sign a guy like Barkley right now, off the street, for nothing.