Saint Doug

Geez, I look through that list and it's full of players that were still on the draft board when the Bills were picking.

He'll sign with the Pats to a 1 year veteran minimum. Really, he hasn't played like his former self for 3 years. And to top it off, he's still injured with no real recovery in sight. No team with a quarter of a brain will thrown tons of money at him. In fact, he may not even be signed and may just retire.

Merry Christmas to all! Now, let me have a win.

Geez guys! Pretty harsh. It probably would be a good idea to have Brohm get some time - but for a totally different reason. He needs real game experience. And besides, we're not in contention for anything. There may be a time when (God forbid) Fitz gets hurt and Brohm has to step in for a game or two. It would be nice if he had some real game experience so it's not a complete disaster.

Ok, let's all put down the Kool-Aid and get real here. Who exactly are all these late-round or undrafted gems everyone is talking about? Besides our WRs, whose production is likely more of a reflection of Fitz and Chan, who are they? Maybe they are slipping my mind now. I'm serious. Who on defense, for example, that was late-round or undrafted, is ripping it up? The only one I can think about is Moats, but I would exactly call him very late round.

The Bills are just a football team. That is, they exist to entertain us. We watch them because it's fun and exciting. Something to distract us from the same old, same old. For us fans, its not about winning. It's about having a good time. Most of our livelihoods don't depend on the Bills winning, so let's sit back and enjoy it. Therefore, the 2010 edition of the Buffalo Bills make me happy. They serve their purpose.

Well, can't say that wasn't unexpected. I love how he makes this sound like it's the Bills problem. The Bills are causing this. The Bills don't want him back. Why doesn't he grow some stones and say "Based on my contract negotiations up to this point, I have decided not to sign it and leave the Bills.

This is exactly what he is thinking. Truth is, Buffalo probably low-balled him and since he has now been "dissed" by this offer, he will now make it sound like he is the victim here. Because they offered him a contract not up to his standards, it is the Bills that don't want him, not Whitner turning the Bills down. But, I guess this is kinda good. I would rather hear about players complaining about their contract before they sign it, not 1-2 years after signing it. But, unfortunately, it occurs in both sets of circumstances.

Geez, it looks like if the first guy didn't trip him, the others down the line would. And I was really surprised by that article above, the stuff Tasker says. I really didn't think Tasker was bending the rules that much back in his prime. I'd like to think of him as a character guy who did everything by the book, not hurdling the oppositions bench to gain an advantage. I know it wasn't against the rules back then, but the game was meant to be played within the big white lines, not outside of them.

Sorry, I had to.

Man, I hope they're holding their own. I wouldn't prefer it any other way.

My thoughts exactly. If those 2 excellent football men didn't see any potential in this guy, they would've just outright cut him rather than placing him on a PS. Many time gems are found hidden amongst the rubble of practice squads.

Not trying to start an argument, but do you really think this was Chan's choice? Based on what we're seeing now, do you think Chan misjudged Trent and Fitz's ability - and what he could do with that ability - that much? I think this was a political "choice" that came down from above. We saw glimpses of what Trent could do in the past. He really lit it up for a bunch of games too. I don't think a new face could've come in here and rightaway declared Trent garbage and cut him. I don't think Ralph (who picked him if I remember correctly) or the fans (who saw glimpses of brilliance in the past) would've got behind that move. Instead, it looked like Chan had to show us (and the rest of OBD) that he was trash.

Ummm, Ralph said we would. Although it was in the beginning of the season, Ralph said QB will be the #1 priority in this year's coming draft. And he is the one who calls the shots. He was likely the one dictating that Edwards start the season. I find it very hard to believe that was solely Chan's decision.

Exactly. The NFL should really attempt to clean up this trash. He should be fired.

Even if he's not doing much, I just don't get the "cut Evans" parade. First of all, he's not taking up cap space. The Bills are near $30 millions under the "cap" and by inspection of his current contract, he's making #2 receiver money (which is actually a bargain). Second, as far as we know, he is not a "locker room cancer" causing discontent amongst the team. And lastly, who's going to replace him? Another hole in the roster is not what this team needs right now. Even if he's not a #1 receiver, who cares? We should be looking to add a #1 receiver to Evans, not necessarily replace him with a #1 receiver. OK, Jeff Littman. Really, who really cares about Ralph and his bags of cash?

He's not going anywhere. His contract from this point on is actually cheap compared to other WRs. There's really no point to cut him. As for trading him? We could probably get a 4th or 5th round pick for him. Not worth it.

This is exactly what the Bills should be doing, pilfering other teams' practice squads. I like this.

Who the hell is Veke?

They have been told to "save their last 3 game paychecks"? What exactly have they been doing with all their other paychecks then? Just blowing them? They make it sound like being laid off for a year is going to be tough. Even the NFL's lowest paid player will make more in 1 year than many fans will make in their whole lifetime. These people disgust me.

Poor baby. It's basically akin to denying his kids an education. How will they ever recover?

Geez, I finally watched the video. That reporter sounds like my wife. Nag, nag, nag. Can't blame him for walking out.

Vick is ripping it up on the football field and Brady is impressed, we should all forgive what he did. Can someone tell me how these two are related at all? I'm really unsure what the article is trying to say. Vick is playing great football, so as a result of this, people should forgive him for drowning and electrocuting dogs? What if he wasn't having an MVP season? No forgiveness then? And all the pro-Vick people bring Big Ben or Stallworth into the argument, but I'm unsure what they have to do with Vick's past actions either. Good Strawman arguments though.

Drunk already?

Geez, by the length of that list, you would think the Bills are competing for a playoff spot or more. The only two players on that list that should be extended are Stevie Johnson and Kyle Williams. In fact, this thread is a great example about how Bills fans easily accept mediocrity.