Reed83HOF

Gimme whatever

So how much will this player be on the field every game? Playing time vs asset is big for beano. Why would u waste a rd 1 or rd 2 pick on a player who will play 5 snaps a game or will be a matchup guy in 2 games a year? Not saying I disagree with you, but this is how they think. Not pointing a direction on anything either. If they feel a player will push them over the top, esp in rd 1 or 2, Beane will go get him. I used RB as an example above, but if Beane feels one of those 2 will push us over the top, he will take them. TE is iffy and Friermuth, maybe someone they could snag to develop, but again look at expected contribution vs rd1 a TE in RD1 is unlikely, those guys take 3 years to develop... The last couple years Beane has plugged every hole he could going into the draft so he can target players and positions (based on value)... They believe in both lines and being tough up front, getting pressure with the front 4 to use the other 7 in coverage and they like zone CBs, but if McD could get a physical man corner, he might bite. Not all draft picks will make this team Oh I would also add that this is a strange year with scouting and covid, look for schools where we have relationships with them, we will be leveraging them with little face time this year... I go for my 2nd one on the 5th...that rough?

Not 100% sure off the top of my head, but here is what I do know: 1.) They like younger players so older guys 24 are out 2.) They like underclassmen, I think Moss was the only Sr they have drafted 3.) Positional value in relation to the round and expected playing time is important 4.) Early rounds, they like players who can contribute right away 5.) They are not bound by conference or strength of opponents 6.) They value intangibles (leadership and team over me) 7.) Physical specimens with athleticism 8.) Need to be smart as far as xs and os. Not afraid to say they made a mistake on a play when reviewing it with them. Can breakdown film 9.) If they have ties to a player or know about his makeup, that will give an edge over another player. For point #3, here is an example: Our offense is a pass based offense and I'm not sure they want to run more, but they want to be better at it when they do. RB since Shady left has been 3rd rounders and cheaper vets. The overall positional pay for RB vs the salary cap is very low, hence we dont swing on big RB FAs and do you want to take the ball out of Josh's hands more than we do now? So while we love Harris as an every down back, Moss can give us some of what he does. Etienne can give us a lot in the pass game, but is that along the lines of what Beane has shown thus far? Or does a Kenny Gainwell make sense? 9.) Asante Samuel Jr.; Sr played for Sean in Philly. This cannot be discounted. My advice look for players described above and for a position that can actually make a difference this year. IIRC, that is roughly what Beane said when trading for Diggs last year... They met with Ford...

Nice signing.

🤔 Depends. What part of the country is she from? Some still like the business in front party in the back look 🤷🏻‍♂️🤦‍♂️😳

That's an impressive crew right there

I was thinking on the ceiling above my bed

Impressive how you look the same in both profile pics.

Better than Hollister...

An early rd 2 pick and early rd3 pick an early rd4 pick...chances are not that high any of them actually move the needle. We aren't drafting in the early teens or top 10 any more... If that's your plan, it isn't enough

I'm not looking for sexy, but improve. We all know the spots TE, CB, Edge, RB Do something

Sure seems it. It would be nice to have added a piece or 2 to try to get over the top... Not hating on sanders either btw. Just question how much he moves the needle. We didn't punt much last year and perhaps he could have extended a few more drives, like 1 to 2 a game, but I'm not sure how much that improves us. Not being negative, just feels like swapping out marginal pieces thus far

Meh... We need to get better, as Beane said at the EoS presser, we aren't an SB team. Resigning our own and fringe FAs doesn't do that either. Drafting 2 spots from the end of each round does not get us there either. Uninspiring... I get Philly wanted a 3 for Ertz, but perhaps we should have signed someone better than this stiff if we wanted an upgrade. I get it is 1 year, but he doesn't move the needle at all = worthless

That's why I said I kid I kid But if you sign up to be a lawyer, I mean it comes with the job 🤣🤣

Well, he is a lawyer for 1.... I kid, I kid...

Too bad this is a family board, I have a few body parts I could replace wing with and I'm curious to see how you would answer

You mean chicken fingers or tenders. Boneless wings do not exist

One question, does Philly have the room to sign their draft class? They will need much more room than us (rookie contracts will have a higher cost basis on the top 51)... Which could affect the timing to be sooner. Plus they may want to sign some lithe players who are FAs or soon to be cuts

I know; I actually think a mid to late 4th would do it and that is the hang up. Our 5th is a 6th rd talent, the raiders pick is mid 5th. I would rather us use the late picks to move up to the 4th instead of trading back. Symantics...

Philly likely wants a 4th, and we are offering one of our 5ths or maybe even a 6th. That is the hold up. LAC were probably offering the same for a player in the last year of his contract who won't be back with that team. Entirely on Philly....

Accuracy or lack therof