Jump to content

Fixxxer

Community Member
  • Posts

    8,455
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fixxxer

  1. Well we can't rule out anyone, can we?
  2. yep, trully amazing.
  3. "2004: Justice was slated to start for his third season at right offensive tackle as a junior in 2004. But he was ineligible for 2004 spring practice and the 2004 season because of a student conduct violation [exhibition of a replica firearm] (he did not attend USC during that time), so he redshirted." "Despite the fact that he has only 6 seasons of football under his belt, he has been compared to a young Art Shell, though not as instinctive or strong, he is very mobile, gaining strength, and learning how to dominate. His character and football intelligence or the only question marks, however they are serious questions." http://condraft.com/player.php?id=738
  4. Cap reasons or not you don't just get rid of your LT if he's any good or has anything left in the tank. And from what I saw from him not last year but the year before his legs aren't there anymore If we sign him to starter money I'd be very pissed. Runyan is/was very good RT, sign him for a year, not more, you have the guy for more than two years and you'll see the Villarial saga all over again. You don't know what to do with the guy, you start to second guess him and his abilities. And before you know it you have one eye in how he perform and the other in cap numbers to see how much you save if the guy is cut.
  5. I don't know about that, it could be. But I do remember Moulds not endorsing Bledsoe's comments about the Bills being "his team" or how about Bledsoe, first day being a cowgirl, I have more & better weapons here than I had in Buffalo. I hope he goes to Philly with a healthy McNabb, of course.
  6. Exactly the problem is that we have almost everything in place except both lines. TD did everything backwards.
  7. IT'S ALIVE!!! IT'S ALIVE!!! sorry I had to do it
  8. I'm not saying put an all out rookie OL but you can play at least two rookies in your starting line-up Dan Buenning (4th round) started at LG for the Buccaners and they went to the playoffs Rob Pettiti (6th round) started at RT for Dallas with the difficult task of protecting the Drewster. Logan Mankins (1st round) started for the Patsies. It can be done and be succesful, someday you have to focus on the most important problem this team have had for over a decade and fix it and the only way to do it iMO is via draft.
  9. You know what? I don't have a problem with people complaining, to each is own I guess. But how do you know this is not getting any better? Because we didn't sign every FA in the market? Have a little faith in the new regime.
  10. We will build the offensive line through the draft as every other team in the league does. We'll draft them, we will play them this year and hopefully we can build a foundation for years to come. They targeted Reggie Wells because he's young and improving (Cardinals said they'll match any offer we make) Neal is 30 years old (in two years he's the next Villarial) Fabini is 31 years old (why would the Jets realease a LT?, can he still play?, doubtful) Runyan is 33 years old (John Fina all over again but on the right side) You see the trend, you sign these guys for a year of two for them to help you get over the top. They would help us get over a 6-10 record. I'd rather play a guy in his second year if not a rookie, no more patchwork OL for me I want a core of young players to build on. If you sign guys like Fabini or Runyan, sign them for depth not to start.
  11. Except for 2001 that is correct. GW's first year was a nightmare with guys like Ben Unatoa and Dan O'Leary.
  12. Awesome. So we're not doomed
  13. I don't see SanFran drafting D'Brick unless they move Jennings to RT.
  14. Runyan is 33 and Mawae is 35. So I'd say no to them Maybe sign Reyes or Neal and Mike Pearson (he's a LT but I sign him to play RT) Other than that it's a good plan
  15. I prefer Tutan Reyes he's one year younger than Neal.
  16. And that is the bottome line. Having said that you see a GM and coach looking build a strong foundation with young players. I think they feel Moulds could be part of the plan but not at his current salary. It's paycut or you're out, a restructure isn't part of the solution, not anymore.
  17. Sorry Dean. "I would try to find a trading partner and see if someone is in need of a QB, if I can't find one I wouldn't draft a QB at 8." It's that better?
  18. I'd trade down.
  19. Trully a dream come true.
  20. He plays with intensity and provides good depth. Plus he's a good ST player.- I like the move.
  21. Try it, it.. just... may work
  22. It doesn't compute in the brain of mine, but to be honest with you I didn't put the effort to understand it.
×
×
  • Create New...