todd

I guess you might want to realize that the pats have not won a superbowl without cheating to get there. So they have won zero superbowls and lost one. I guess it proves the Pats can't win a SB without cheating. That is the only conclusion.

Just because you say there won't be, doesn't make it true. Actually, it is too late. 9 months of this in the media has proven that there is an *. Keep trying to defend your team, you belicheck fellating moron, keep it up! Cheating is wrong, it gives an unfair advantage. The patriots* cheated, gained an unfiar advantage, and therefore any success they* had while cheating is doomed to have an *. So what is it like to ignore morals?

The patriots* are still cheaters. It is proven. Bellicheat admitted cheating. Their 'success' is forever tainted. Anyone who is willing to give them a pass on their cheating, like you apparently, is a moron.

That was brilliant. Brought a tear to my eye. I only wish the patriots* the worst.

It isn't just funny, it's true!

There's a solution to this, you whining kitty. Don't friggin cheat!

So, um, what FA WRs are left out there?

Chad Johnson was HORRIBLE that game. He looked like he was stoned. And people want us to trade for him?

Yes, lets compare the Bills FA strategy to that of the Redskins. That would be a quite valid comparison.

That's wonderful. Did they spend as much money on OL as the Bills did last year?

Yeah. Check FA 2007 for Buffalo. I'd say the paid a boatload of $$ to upgrade the OL. Buffalo couldn't go another year without replacing losses at CB.

From Peter King's article: According to NFL playing-time documents, the average third corner in the league played 57 percent of his team's defensive snaps last year. I had no idea it was that high. Not only that, we play in a division with the Patriots. Any discussion regarding our need for more than two starting corners is now dead. 57% of snaps for what used to be called a dime corner? Wow. I'm surprised. We might as well be discussing whether or not we need 3 starting LBs. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writ.../11/mmqb/1.html

For the $$ we paid him, he could be a bargain.

Taylor is an awesome player, and might be for the next 1 - 2 years. He would help the Bills. But not for a friggin 1st round pick! That's just silly. Maybe a 4th. A 1st round pick isn't worth only 2 - 3 years of production.

Basically it is his personality. Some people like loudmouth wankers as a HC.

That's really cool! Good to see his family around, his kid on his lap, parents proud of him, etc. If that's what he likes, he'll fit in western NY just fine.

Do I need a resume to prove that I don't know poop about evaluating players? Here's my resume on evaluating players: 1. Ryan Leaf rules! 2. Eli Manning sux!

People should read the entire article. I'm going to bookmark it and read it / post it next year before the draft. Lots of people around here gave me sh-- about this opinion the past few months and said I was adding to the noise around here for posting it. That said, Easterbrook may be better at expressing his thoughts in writing than I am. I think he gets paid to do it or something. His point? That even the professionals get the draft wrong. Therefore, fans shouldn't get all pissed because what they think they know doesn't happen on draft day. Fans don't know crap about evaluating players. So they should shut up and not pretend they do.

EULA - End User License Agreement. You see it on software. Means that no matter how bad the software is, or how bad it messes up your computer, or how much money it costs you or your business in doing so, only the end user is at fault. Not the people that wrote the software. Whatever the guarantee the software has, it basically says "Whoops! We didn't mean anything we said in the product marketing! We didn't mean to say that the software should do what it says it does!"

I expect that after three years, he is at the very least a very good corner on the verge of making a pro-bowl. There's a reason these guys sign 5-year contracts.

I bet reading that description made a few folks around here a little aroused.

God I hope so. I have a new meditation chant instead of "Ommmmm": "Pleasedon'tgethurt, Pleasedon'tgethurt, pleasedon'tgethurt"

You should grasp that a critique of the board is not a critique of you.

Because the people who hate the draft have the most vitriol about it, and are mostly the ones acting like children about it. They are also the ones who are completely unable to substantiate their opinions. And you should read down a little further in the post.

Nanny-nanny boo-boo!