colin

true. he has lapses all the time (when you lose your speed and explosion, you have to be savey and gutty, moulds is neither). he shortarmed one deep pass early yesterday along the sidelines, it was infront and if he dove at it we have a 30+ yard gain. he gets no double coverage and has made one big play all year. i have been worried that we need to replace him with a big body, but he isn't getting jack done anyway. he is done here.

we need to get 1 or 2 new olinemen, renegotiate mike williams and have his start at RT. hutch and bently are FA this year, if we sign one or both and let TT walk AND draft a young guy we are well on our way. we need to draft high and often for DT, and sign ANY decent DT that has a chance to come our way. KC is a team with an outstanding O line that can't get it done. we need some guys on D too. can we draft a coach?

i think the following gets us the best team possible next year: WR-- get moulds to renegotiate BIG TIME (don't think he will) or just cut him kick reed in the balls for 20 straight minutes, then cut him (even if he is a FA) ** we might want to sign a big body WR or draft one, unless Aiken can do it OL: Teague is gone, buh bye Williams-- he renegotiates. we can't keep him at his current cost and i think he looks bad enough that he knows he won't get big cash in FA. he stays our RT and when healthy can play Sign Hutch/good rook G/somebody else for LG Sign Le'Charles for C (at about 4.5 bucks a year he will be barely more expensive than TT) draft an LT or 2 (at least 1 on day one) Villarial and Preston can fight for RG, villarial might get cut too. Dline: sam is gone edwards comes back we draft the best DT on the board, perhaps 2 (2 on day one might be a good idea) LB: posey is gone, spikes fletcher and crowell look very good. i'd get rid of london if we can get someone else to replace him tho Safety: keep vincent (he might be a better nickle, or to play in place of nate clements). cut milloy (wow, money for nothing. guy has heart but plays terribly) Corner: sign nate if he ain't too expensive (5 or 6 years 30-35 mill would be worth it fo sho), other wise tag and trade (prolly get a late first or early second). if he goes we need a day one pick at corner, we should have 5 day one picks if he goes, so DT,DT,LT,C,S/LB/WR would be a nice mix i don't think we need any other changes cutting a bunch of dudes (moulds, milloy, maybe London, Adams, letting TT walk) will open up enough cash to get in 2 solid ass interior linemen. if mike gets a paycut, we will all of a sudden have a good line! losing a couple guys on O in 03 hurt us bad, losing a couple guys on D this year hurt us bad, i think we can add a couple guys on each side and get better just as quickly. the biggest thing we have to do is get TC and grey out of here. MM is nothing special, but it is the schemes that hurt us the most.

i think it is simpler we aren't a super bowl team, so don't compare us to the top of the NFL. we are beginning to suck badly on D, and do suck badly on O. our special teams are very good, if not great. our special teams coach is a top guy, and was a top guy when he came here. now, the last time we had a GREAT o, it was 02 in 02 we got gilbride. gilbride is insane, but knows how to make an O produce (a la mike martz). he knows how to make a passing game run (houston, jags, buffalo, giants, he can make a big play O work well) we had bledsoe and the weapons, but a bad line and travis butter fingers. i'd say we were a bit better in 02 than in 04 in terms of personel (mcgahee and evans are top talents tho), but our QBs and Lines were about as bad the last time we had a good D was in 04, and it started in 03. leBeou came in in 03, and the D kinda rode that for 2 years we have had a drop off in talent this year in D, but we were down some guys in secondary last year and managed to show up. frankly, the answer is clear we are a bad team because we have 3rd rate coaching. everyone on our staff, except special teams, is cutting their teeth and sucking. of course, we also have a head coach who doesn't really know what he is doing either. if we had fox, or lewis, or capers, or anyone with some balls at HC, we'd have made it to the play offs last year and be doing better this year.

nate has been below par this year, and today he sucked bag however, it isn't just the way the play. grey has ALWAYS been running this D like a game of madden. he does the same thing all the time: picks a D he wants to run and just throws it out there. no adjustments, no wrinkles, no new developments. same crap all the time. we are predictable on D, we show exactly what we are going to before the snap, and other teams can adjust. last year and this year, like last week, when we had a decent game on D it was because guys just came up big with big plays. against nearly any team on the road this year, opponents make big plays and it is like they knew it would happen at the outset. no surprises, no struggel, just easy execution when ever they need. at first it was third down and redzone, where we are the worst in the NFL, but now it is every down. we are the worst in the NFL in run D, in redzone D, and near the bottom on third down. you don't get that bad in every category without terrible coaching. grey is an idiot, even tho for a couple seasons he has had some good toys to play with. on O we might be worse. i want to stab our coaches with a friggin ice pick

if our team really wants to make a move, we will cut or renegotiate: moulds milloy london mike williams sam adams and sign hutch AND bently in the offseason. we really need new coaches tho, god we have some bad people

moulds M williams S adams Vincent Milloy Clements Reed (HAHAHA) Kelsey London has had one good game all the above represent nearly half of our cap space and top picks, and non have done jack all year. the thing that kills me the most about today is that our secondary had zero positive plays all day. not one. a big part of it is they played gutless, but the other part is grey is a f@cking @sshole. he really sucks. clements and mularky sucks too. on player decisions i don't want to throw TD off a cliff, but based on the jokes of coaches we have had in here, he really needs to take a long walk of a short pier.

so the only road game we have been in after 5 min of the 2nd quarter has been new england. our crap line and losers like josh reed need to go, but to me it is about coaching. the players have no disciplin, confidence, or ability to execute. can we draft a coach and GM?

exactly. every damn game it is the same sh!!t. we do something all game and it is ez to exploit. today it is the seem. every play towards the seem is open, and in the middle of our crap zone they have a big TD and a large gain as well. we really have terrible management. from TD on down. I have not been anti TD thus far, but with the coaches he puts in place he just needs to go

i like play action. i just learned about it in a seminar (because as a bills fan i had no idea it existed). what you do is fake a run, but then pass the ball. it is particularly good for teams with 1 a run game 2 some pass pro problems 3 fast wrs who can get away for a big pass 4 a qb with a big arm who can hit a wide open wr deep now, i'm no coach, but i think plays that can work, and when they do go for big yards are good for a football team. i'm probably wrong tho, let's see more of swift footed kelly holcomb running those fake qb sneek option laterals to willis on 4th and 1!!

elevendyhundred

there is something gay about stopping sex with a girl when you are one on one to bring in your 25 buddies so you can swim in each other's swamp. also, singing to each other about each other's wang is ghey as hell. do everett and roscoe share a room?

$50 mill? wow, we added about $15 mill to his contract since signing him? williams, bust or not, does not get 9 mill a year. his contract averages between 6-7 mill a year, which is also his average cap figure (it was low to start and is high now and beyond). the first problem with cutting him is he MAY end up being a good RT, so if we cut him we could be out a good lineman. the second problem is that his cap hit is huge and for the most part locked in. the bills will prolly have to see if they can't work out a blend and extend with some bonuses after 2 and 3 years so if the REALLY have to they can cut him then, and not get destroyed on the cap in the meantime. you don't want to lose cap room and a player (who i bet the bills still think could play good ball) when you could salvage something. i still think our best possible line is LT Peters LG - New guy (hutch, young guy now, new rook, Gandy?) C Le'Charles RG Villarial/Preston RT Williams if Peters can play at least as well as Jonas at LT after one offseason of training (and i bet he could play better) this would be a great run blocking line and a decent pass blocking line. with JP in there he will avoid more sacks than most, and this line could be pretty awesome on 3rd and short with mcgahee in there. you ditch Williams and you need an upgrate at LT (who would have to be a rook) soon and would have less cap room to get one. that cap room could go towards a new interior lineman or resigning Nate/something in FA

the ratings are gathered by household. i'd suspect that in buff, GB and Pitts more than the usual number of people get together to watch the game, so the per capita ratings are even higher. in B lo and GB in particular, a large % of the population (compared to other markets) are actually at the game in the first place, so the number of people impacted by the game is damn high

i think the bills would like him at RT and peters at LT, along with drafting a guy, and signing a guy (le'charles for 5 bucks a year would be about 1.5 bucks more than trey and 2 times as good). if williams can play RT as well as he did last year, and sign a blend and extend that will get him costing an average of 5 bucks a year on the cap instead of the 7 that he averages now, we could end up having a solid line with essentially zero cap hit. that leaves us cash to sign our rook DT, lock up Clements, and even grab grady jackson or something

they should pay the fine twice and make the game a bit better looking.

i don't think KH will really be "missing" the playing time. he looked drunk against KC, that fake sneak lateral thing on 4th and 1, he just stood there and looked right. oh well, he'll be there to back up when we need him again

like all phillips Ds, the chargers don't get many turnovers. brees is also likely to drop the ball or chuck it into the D when pressued (he runs from sacks and wings passes all the time, only his munchkin ass throws almost underhand). we will give up some runs to LT, and a couple passes to a wide open gates, but we will also take the ball away and exploit their terrible secondary. if willis gets past the line he has a good chance to eat up chunks of yardage. we might decide to lay an egg against these guys on the road, but i think our D in NE and last week are showing confidence and are forcing turnovers and not getting discouraged. after a big run or bad 3rd down we used to look panicky, now we just seem to keep on bringing it. good test for our team this week

chances are we will lose this game, but i do think the chargers have become the over rated under rated team. every year people like to pick the dark horse, and this year it was the chargers (last year it was cincy, year before it was the colts). the way the TV people pick the dark horse is to pick a really good team, but not the champs or the odds on favorites, so the chargers are it this year. they have weapons, but are the least consistent team in the NFL. with their sloppy ass corners (jeez jammer was taken 1 pick after mike williams, that is 3 texas picks in the top 5 in two years if you include davis who are hoping to keep starting) they tend to be wide open for bombs. they also don't have that great of an o line. if losman plays fearlessly and chucks it deep we have a shot

for realz i wish kelly would snap and totally flip out on brewski and make him his B word like momma's boy harbough

did a chemical engineer with six fingers kill your brother or something? yes. it is a good score. bout 35 out of 50

i remember evans being the smartest WR in the NCAA the year we took him. he had the wonderlick score of a chemical engineer.

i will bet that lewis was the daddy in his cell. dude is friggin c@ck deez

i said a shot at 2K, 1800 is a few long runs in a season away from 2k i think he can compare to Jamal Lewis, but i think he has potential to be more. the comparison made between lewis and willis above saying you can't compare them because a great back catches and blocks and doesn't come out on 3rd down is silly. lewis does not catch, is not a great blocker, and is off on 3rd downs all the time. he is also being outplayed by chester taylor on his own team. if we get a couple top tier interior linemen in here we have a solid chance running willis how baltimore ran lewis.

willis had a bad game against KC he still got about 70 yards, that's good for over 1100 a year. that's his bad game when mike williams and villerial have been healthy willis has run all over people. once we get our line straight he has a shot at 2K. i'll take him over freaking steve daivs