Sorry but it was. If you say otherwise, I call you a Naaman apologist.
Don't quite understand the need for Naaman starting. Our receivers are doing really good. Naaman will get his chance if someone goes down. Chan has proven to be a pretty damn good talent evaluator. If Naaman is this much superior than the other guys, he'd be in there already.
Yes, he can catch really well. But you also have to be able to run good routes and be an effective blocker (which is a must in Chan's system).