MikeSpeed

You are missing my point. The fans don't need to prove themselves, because we do our jobs. We show up for the games, we buy Bills apparel, we do our parts to support the team. The Bills FO has been a total nightmare for a decade now. It's time for them to prove to us they know what they are doing. I never claimed to know anything about talent evaluation, but I do know there are people on this board that have done a better job at making draft pick selections over the years than the FO has. (This year's FO not withstanding) The current FO is still an unknown, and to date they have done little to prove they are an upgrade. They may change after the season starts, but right now how can you not be numb.

Why do we have to prove we know more than the FO. Shouldn't they prove they know more than us? For the last decade we've proven ourselves but the FO has not.

Perry Fewel would be the head coach right now.

I agree. The D is a total question mark. As is the whole team. Too many changes to know what we have before seeing a single play. I hope they're great, but I wouldn't put money on it at this point.

No. That only puts the RB count at 4. We'll keep 3 but traing camp needs bodies.

I didn't know they still make those computers?

We've been using replacement players for 10 years now.

First off I'm not a Trent Edwards booster. He is a Bills QB and until he's not I want him to succeed. To the TE haters... What will it say if TE wins the QB competition this year? It says for good or bad he is the best we have on our team in the coaches opinion. If he wins the competition and he sucks, then IMO the GM and coach did a horrible job of evaluating the talent on our team. Don't give me this crap about not being sure of the current talent level of our QBs. You're being paid to know just that! It also says except for Brown (who most likely will be on the PS) all the QBs should be replaced next year. Now if he is replace mid-season and his replacement does well, then I have to ask why wasn't he starting to begin with? I will be really worried that our new coach is no better at judging talent than our old coach. Boy is that a scarey thought. At this point I'll trust that they have a plan. so it just seems stupid to crusade against a player THIS offseason when we know nothing about how this team is going to function. Next year, when we have a better feel for the type of O we will be running, feel free to fire your pot shots.

You really do get a warm fuzzy feel listening to that interview. The man should run for office.

It doesn't make our draft look so good after looking at your starters. 2 part time starters and no full timers. Yikes! With our lack of talent I hope that someone else would step up also. Please don't bring up special teams. We always have the best and it has gotten us no where.

OMG! I swear if the Bills had drafted a water boy 1st TSW would be praising it as the answer to all that's wrong with the Bills. "He's got good speed so he'll be able to get those water bottles out on the field faster. He's got freakish strength so he can carry more water. He's a smart guy so he'll get the best spring water he can find." Come on people he's Fred Jackson part II. I'll say it right here and now... If he runs for more yards than than Jackson did this past year I'll be the first to admit I was wrong!

Nope. We are only taking the BPA... Nate Allen S South Florida. Enjoy!

Let's see 3 RB drafted #1 in since 2003. This one really feels like the McGahee pick to me. The only saving grace is that there seems to be some really good talent left. So they can ease my mind if they make up for it tomorrow.

Yes! Roger Saffold would be OK there. Clausen might even make it this far down.

Just what we need another special teams guy. Living here in SC I've seen quite a bit of Spiller. The guy needs space to operate. The Bills offense has no space. The guy - will die - on the vine - behind our line. Rhyme fully intended.

Anyone who will be wearing a jersy with a number in the 80's. Opps!

Anyone who will be wearing a jersy with a number lower than 50.

My definition of a reach: Selecting a player at more than one spot above the next team that you believe will want to select him. Therefore if we select Clausen at 9 but the next team that we believe would want him isn't selecting until 20 then we reached. We should have tried to trade down as far as possible (preferably to 19 using the example) to gain more picks, and still get the guy we want. I believe you can always find a trading partner. It's just a matter of what compensation you are willing to except. Of coarse this is a high risk poker game but that's what makes the draft fun.

Bryan Bulaga, Roger Saffold, Eric Norwood

And if the moon was really made of cheeze, NASA would be on the look out for giant space cows.

I wonder if this is why Gailey said we will be taking a RB. He want to entice another team to either trade above us so a better suited player will fall to us, or he's hoping we can get a draft partner if we threaten to take Spiller?

How ironic is that? Buffalo is looking for trade offers for all 3 of their QBs too.

A bird in the hand could get you a punch in the face.

White Lynch in compton would have been carring that loaded gun instead of keeping it in his trunk.

Well, we don't know who is going to be good or not. So let's just draft a QB in every round this year. Then fill the rest of the holes with rookie free agents. If we still don't find the QB with the majic force field... then we do it all again next year.