Doc

This is the same guy who was accidentally added to the Signal chat but instead of informing them of it he went public. What a hack.

That's what I've been saying for years. Get it back from the institutions who got it. And another lesson: government involvement always increases prices. Always. BTW, on a good note, my son will end up paying about $19K/year for law school, at a top-20 school no less. He got a $17K/year merit-based scholarship and when he went for accepted students day they told him to establish residency during his first year and then get in-state tuition for the remaining 2.

Jake Tapper: a tree falling in the forest...

It's amazing how much personal feelings can override logic.

That's not what I was getting at. Just wondering if this leads to his dismissal.

I know they've been doing well the past 3 years at least, but good to see most of the Buffalo professional teams doing well.

I'd say her solo career was definitely pop. Not that there's anything wrong with it and I have very fond memories of "Stand Back" and her other hits.

Keep it up Dems. You're definitely changing peoples' already low opinion of you...

"We didn't have time to find out if lockdowns and vaccines for kids were appropriate..."

I like this video better.

That's amazing. Do they give Brind'Amour the boot?

You're not going to have anyone go to jail over JFK and MLK since they're all dead by now. And if it was the Government that had them assassinated, like every other Admin did in not releasing that info, there's nothing good that comes out of it. As for Epstein, I have no doubt a lot of rich and powerful people are implicated and I suspect that those investigating have been told that if they are outed, they/their families are dead. But with Trump being President, I have no idea why they'd lie about the assassination attempts on him.

That's a pretty big ***** "security lapse," don't you think? Other things that feed the conspiracy is they had the bombers cell phone data but it was conveniently "corrupted," bomb sniffing dogs never detected the bombs, and, again, what was she doing at the DNC that morning when she had no business being there at all and why did they not reveal where she was for a year or so afterwards? The security lapses on J6 were multi-factorial and had little to do with Trump. I have no doubt that Pelosi and Bowser refused requests for more LEO's at least because of optics and that's why you see her taking blame for it on video. And again, "he made me do it" isn't a valid argument. And don't make me laugh about conspiracy theories. Russian collusion called...

The National Guard and more CP should have already been there. Ex-Capitol police chief Steven Sund stated that he requested their presence days in advance and was rebuffed. As for Harris, yes when they found the bombs at the DNC that were already there from the night before, she was evacuated. Again why was she there at the DNC HQ to begin with and why didn't they discover the bombs before taking her there?

Lying about their lying is sure to win back the trust of the people…

Biden's Admin was a disaster. Accomplished? LOL!

No the Capitol Police were under-manned because Pelosi and Bowser wanted it that way. Or were incredibly incompetent at their jobs since all the intelligence reports for days prior were saying there was a high likelihood of unrest. Take your pick. And Harris was evacuated because of the bomb? LOL! No. For some reason which we still haven't heard the answer to, instead of being at the Capitol to see the certification of her own historic election as the first female and of-color VP...she was taken to the DNC in the morning, well before the riot started. After which the bombs, which were planted the night before, were found. Again more incompetence.

Yes, no moral high ground. The Biden Admin featured a mentally deficient President whose condition they lied about to the American public in collusion with the MSM and social media, in what was quite possibly the biggest scandal in American political history. The cabinet was filled with mostly unqualified people and the few that were qualified were terrible at their jobs. Leaders from all around the world knew we had no President and acted accordingly.

They wanted something to happen. I don't think they wanted/expected people to break into the Capitol, but they wanted unrest outside and/or a false flag narrative. Hence under-manning the CP, throwing flash bangs, probably many agitators in the crowd and sending Harris for no reason at all to the DNC HQ where "bombs" were somehow missed by the FBI.

They expected everything done ON DAY ONE!

There's going to be a lot more as the more sane Dems break with the progressives.

I didn't ignore his words. In fact I used them to show you that he told people one thing (to be peaceful and patriotic)...and some ignored him and did the opposite. "Fight like hell" isn't code for "break into the Capitol," without which this is little more than a "mostly peaceful protest" outside the Capitol. There were no firearms used to enter the Capitol, much less once inside. And once inside it was clear no one had a plan. And they all ended up leaving on their own. It was an embarrassment for sure. And those who committed criminal acts deserved to be punished. There is a lot of blame for what happened that day. But at no point was the US Government in danger of falling.

I already debunked the "encouraging political violence" fallacy. You want to talk encouraging political violence, tell me about the the summer of 2020, which lasted for months, not one afternoon, and had long-lasting effects. You have no moral high ground here. As for "authoritarian tendencies," give me a break. Having an Admin that uses an all-too-willing press to help them lie to the people (most notably about the mental decline of the President, begging the question "who was actually running the country?") and who uses them and social media to silence dissent is pretty authoritarian. Again there's no moral high ground for you here. Then add on the wacky policies espoused by the left. The lowering of standards. Trying to appease our enemies and/or showing little backbone.

You can call it fascism if you want. You'd be wrong but, hey, you're entitled to keep using the word. Just because many of us don't want a complete breakdown of social norms doesn't make up fascists. That we don't want illegals flooding in, defunding the police, boys in womens lockerrooms/sports, permanent sterilization and mutilation of children and a lowering of standards doesn't make us fascists.