SectionC3

Hard to say because many of the records are still sealed. But your analogy to federal criminal law is inapt. The absence of a charge of rebellion or insurrection doesn't mean that such an event didn't occur. And, if you want to play the hyperbole game, I suppose you'll agree that abortion is a procedure to remove a parasite from a woman's body, not the "murder" or the "killing" of a "baby."

Any W on this one is a fake one for the Crow. Maybe he can brag about his Internet victory to his crowy pals when they next get together and complain about how it's too easy for black folks to vote.

Actually I suspect that any destruction of that drug was occasioned by the fact that it had no resale value and that it was cheaper to destroy it than it was to store it. One of those not throwing good money after bad/hoax things.

I’d be less worried about a “farce” and more worried about the insurrection. That is, unless you supported the insurrection. So, did you support the insurrection?

Good points. Alleged dishonesty is way worse than ransacking the Capitol in an attempt to override the results of a presidential election.

Bottom line: You asked/demanded that I "[e]xplain how they are trying to take away right to vote." I asked you to clarify the "they" in your question. You now say that you can't provide that clarification because you don't know who the they is. Makes perfect sense, only to those who use Crow logic. And you want to be my financial adviser. Not happening, sir. There's no misunderstanding. The Crow has to clarify his question/demand. Because, as he knows, as he himself phrased the question/demand, he has acknowledged that he has crowy pals. It's sad, I know, but there's a reason why this guy has earned the nickname Chef Jim Crow.

You're a confusing guy. All I wanted to know was how you defined "they" for the purpose of your question. Is the "they" the "your crowy pals" to whom I referred? Because if it is, you have acknowledged having crowy pals. So let's just start there. Do you or do you not have crowy pals?

I'm still a little confused by your crowy "logic." Are the people to whom you refer not your pals? Or are they pals of yours who are not crowy? Please advise.

These posts clarify the issue, Chef Jim Crow. I posted: "When some of your crowy pals try to take it away, these people fight to retain the right. It should be simple to understand, even for you." You responded: "Awesome. Explain how they are trying to take away right to vote. I’ll give you one shot." I then asked: “ 'They' being your crowy pals?" So, this is simple, even for you. Is the "they" to whom you referred your crowy pals? Please don't make this any harder than it needs to be. TwoBillsDrive turns its lonely eyes to you on this issue, Chef Jim Crow.

I'm sorry. I'm just trying to make sure that I comprehend your question. The "they" to whom you refer is your crowy pals, is that correct? I can't possibly begin to answer your question if I don't know the identity of the "they" to which or whom you refer.

“They” being your crowy pals?

When some of your crowy pals try to take it away, these people fight to retain the right. It should be simple to understand, even for you.

Call Oklahoma. I hear that state has a lot of HCQ to get rid of. Something about falling for the Trump HCQ hoax …

Crow logic at its finest.

You’ll probably try to treat that with HCQ, too.

Good point. Let’s get the Antifa Air Force on this guy. The AAF is not nonsense at all.

That is a guy with good judicial temperament. Hoax. Trump probably is pissed he wasn’t invited to the kegger with Squigg. Thanks for the update. I’m sure you posted that out of concern, and in no way intended your post to sound the dog whistle.

Idle time, right? Time for them to get busy.

Thank you on Jerry Sullivan. Unreadable and unlistenable. Like a friggin dark cloud all of the time.

I was just thinking that the best way to deal with this might be for all of them to get the F off of Twitter and social media this year. Enough is enough. This is becoming a problem.

Asked, and asked, and asked, and asked again, then asked some more. And answered prior to your redundant questioning. Do your research, Chef Jim Crow.

Lysol. The man tried to use Lysol to combat the virus. That says it all. Not a mask, not social distancing, not anything grounded in common sense. Lysol.

Your gibberish is incomprehensible. And Trump. I'm still waiting for this to magically disappear.

Ha. The Crow complaining about someone behaving in an immature and dumb fashion. The irony is thick tonight.

I don’t “do your research” for you. Feel free to find the answer and give yourself the satisfaction that that you apparently crave. Have a nice day, Chef Jim Crow.