SectionC3

You have a weird thing about calling people pedos. Very strange. Maybe you could come up with a new hoaxy insult. Chef Jim Crow with the mic drop. Hilarious. Better than choking on HCQ.

No. More judges = likely more cert grants and definitely fewer opinions/judge. I'm not saying that I necessarily agree with court packing (any more comments like the one yesterday from McConnell may change that view), but there's no dispute that more judges = obvious ability to increase volume.

Says the “Doc” who spent months insisting upon the efficacy of HCQ as a COVID-19 treatment. Have another gnaw on that giant block of HCQ, sir.

Loopholes and flat taxes are entirely different things.

More HCQ logic here. Some guy who is registered in the same political party as me did something reprehensible 20 years ago, and I had absolutely nothing to do with that misconduct. But because of that registration, I, as part of the “left,” have no moral high ground to say that anyone who is not a member of said political party has engaged in reprehensible behavior. If only that was the end of the stupid logic. Now, it is implied that the sitting president is a pedophile based on what I understand to be anecdotal illustrations in which he is a bit too touchy with people by prevailing norms. How that translates to pedophile is beyond me, but then again, we are dealing with people who follow the Q and who practice HCQ logic. People of Praise called. They agree with you. Have a nice day.

I’ll give you the thumbnail sketch on the flat tax. Somebody who makes $50k/year in taxable income pays, say, 17% in tax on dollars 1 through 60,000. Right now, it’s a graduated scale (kicks in at about 10% on dollars about 10,000 through around 40,000, then rises to 12% on dollars 40,001 and 60,000. Or thereabouts. I don’t have the tax code in front of me.). I use the 17% figure because I believe that’s what Steve Forbes proposed years and years ago. Now, let’s examine what the person who makes $1m year would pay. Under the current structure, their tax hit would be the same as yours on dollars 1 through 60,000. Then, however, as income rises, the tax rate goes up, so they might pay 24% on dollars, say, 80,000 through 120,000 and then even more on dollars 120,000 and beyond. Under the flat tax, they’d pay a straight 17% on everything. So who gets the tax cut in a flat tax world? The rich guy, on the monies beyond your income. And, your tax hit likely goes up to pay for it. But if you think simplification is the preferable route, hey, that’s cool. Feel free to give tax breaks to the rich and to jack up taxes on the working class and poor.

So you’re absurdly rich then, too? Too much time hanging out with Steve Forbes if you believe in the flat tax theory. Who does that benefit the most? Rich folks. Really, really, really rich folks. To the detriment of most to the people who will read this message.

Good point. Grab 'em by the . . . never mind. So, bottom line time. A Democrat did something reprehensible over 20 years ago, so Matt Gaetz and everyone else registered in a rival political party gets a free pass to do similarly reprehensible things. Makes. Perfect. Sense. There you go again with your HCQ logic.

It's been awhile. But it's time. Hoax. It's still Trump. Carry on.

You misspelled insurrectionists. I think you meant to say the insurrectionists broke 5 windows, overtook the United States Capitol, catalyzed death, and repeatedly broke the law during their insurrection.

I didn’t realize that Matt Gaetz had changed his name to Joe. Interesting.

Scumbag, yes. Not a billionaire . . . Probably, based on the STAR claim in 2015 or whatever it was. Demented . . . Wearing the zipper in the back for the speech to cultists in North Carolina was not a good look. That one might have some legs. There are suckers born every minute, I guess.

What happened to all of the concern with the present danger that is Antifa? Putin wasn’t a problem from 2016 through 2020. Now we’re all worried about Putin and want to start shooting at him. Meanwhile, worry about the vaunted Antifa Air Force has evaporated. It’s almost as if Antifa was a hoaxy scare tactic. I’m so confused.

Right back at you.

Hoax. You believed it to be efficacious in this context. Try it with zinc and a zpac, you said. Mix it up with some Lysol and roundup, too, you said. And now we know that the idea that HCQ is an effective treatment for COVID is junk science.

Glad you can still see. Figured you had ingested so much HCQ in the past year that you might have gone blind.

I don’t know who may have lied about it being unsafe, but I know that you’ve lied about it being an effective treatment for COVID. So there’s that. Antifa at it again, I see.

Not very much, because of how friggin stupid they are. Unfortunately, these are the same type of morons who believe that Antifa wants to come and burn their hovels. And the same dopes who believe that if they do a few shots of fish tank cleaner and liberally apply Roundup to their lungs they can beat that hoaxy thing called COVID.

I didn't realize that people who watch OAN know how to count. Interesting. Are you talking about your HCQ junk science again?

The government has no idea what to make of the spate of recent UFO sightings. But our friends in QAnon know the truth. It's the newly-reconstituted Antifa Air Force. While the rest of the world was busy munching on hydroxychloroquine, figuring out how to suppress the vote, and pretending the insurrection that occurred on January 6th was fake news, Antifa developed this other-worldly technology to get a jump on burning Democrat-run cities. Feel free to post any updates you may have about the Antifa Air Force and/or Antifa arsonists here.

What about the prevailing tax rate? Maybe it's better to get it now before NYS leg raises taxes on ultra wealthy. So maybe the Bills did him a bit of a favor in the long run here.

Depends on the tax code.

FWIW I suspect it's an automatic restructure. That is, I believe the Bills have the right to convert the money from roster bonus money to signing bonus without the consent of the player. I don't have the contract, but that's my understanding.

Perfect time to leak the story if he wants to stick it to GB. They’ll never pull the trigger on dealing him in a few hours, meaning that, assuming he does force his way out this offseason, he’ll almost certainly go to a team that will have spent its first round pick on a player that will improve the starting 22 for the 2021 season.

Nicely done. I think for Trey Lance you could have written “watched Josh Allen destroy them on MNF and took the available player most similar to Allen.”