GG

A retweet of Bernie marxism on this page is truly astounding. Here's the snippet I am speechless how a near-octogenarian who sets legislative policy doesn't understand how equity markets work.

All it means is that Trump stepped on his dick once again with a premature Tweet. All he had to do is wait a few hours for Barr's actions to publicly percolate through the system. But, Bobs of the world don't understand chronology.

Did Gillislee live up to his contract in an offense that puts RBs in the best possible position? Speaking of changed narratives and pettiness - did anything extraordinary happen to Eric Wood which led to a whopping $10.4M dead cap hit in 2018? Asking for a few friends who aren't Bills fans.

Sending out a Tweet after a verdict is handed down is interfering with the Judiciary? And that's the same as a highly influential private citizen meeting with the head prosecutor who was in the middle of an investigation of his wife?

Where did the WH interfere with the Judiciary branch?

Did you really just write this? Do you understand any topics in which you decide to participate? Do you again wonder why you are considered a joke?

How would a high character guy get benched for awful practice habits?

There's definitely pettiness in these exchanges. BTW, who'd you rather still have "Touchdown" Mike or the draft pick that Bills got for him? How did Mike do in an offense geared for mildly talented RBs to do well?

I honestly don't understand the controversy. Cutting Dareus is a no-brainer if he doesn't agree to a team friendly contract extension. They have until Feb 25 to make a decision, after that almost $20 million of his pay is guaranteed) Jags clear $20 million of 2020 cap space with an outright cut.

About time workers realized what they'll be losing with a Medicare for all plan.

Which part of "multicultural" is confusing to her?

Those are the first threads that popped up. There were more, but you and the board will have to take my word for it because I'm done with homework for the day. Note how you immediately deflect the topic to Ragland, when the issue was about Harris. The threads also prove the point that while you may be right in many cases, you always twist the narrative after the fact to always appear correct no matter what position you initially took.

Of course you hadn't mentioned after he re-signed with the Jets. Maybe a weather-wane is more correct? And then this twist. If you don't want to hit the links, here are the quotes:

That would be insanely out of character for Beane

That's your position now, but wasn't at the time or years after that offseason. You always framed it as a big mistake & miss on the Bills part. The Star signing was an admission of a mistake thinking the defense wouldn't miss Dareus in the middle. That move was 100% "process" because it was clear that Dareus was not going to be onboard with what McD was building. So, Beane plucked the best available Panther to help stabilize the D. Looking at this in retrospect, Bills got more overall value from Star in his two years for $26 million than they have from Murphy for $15 million, although both underperformed.

If you know the details of the case, was the sentencing recommendation of 8-9 years appropriate for the crime?

Good, then you should have no problem showing where I'm arguing that Murphy should be cut right now. Right on cue, the narrative shifts as if the Bills messed up by not signing Harris to an above-market deal, as opposed to the reality where Bills had no chance to sign Harris to an above-market deal because Jets extended him before he hit FA. But thanks for confirming your usual doublespeak to always appear to be correct in retrospect. In your narrative, Bills would have been wise to overpay an aging vet to help a coach install his system, but were clearly stupid to overpay another aging vet to help another coach install his system.

For once, I agree with you. But it will be fun seeing the Bernie Bro meltdown when the inevitable happens.

Are you responding to me as if I'm advocating cutting him immediately?

It would help if you can follow a discussion. All references to Murphy's dollars are related to his scheduled cash payment and cap hit in 2020, as per his signed contract with the Buffalo Bills.

But that realistically isn't an option, because there's no way Beane leaves himself exposed to having two DEs falling off contracts after the 2020 season, and the rising stars due for extensions. To me the ideal situation is to sign 1) FA stud or 2) sign 2nd tier DE. In either situation, you evaluate Murphy's slot because he doesn't produce for his cap hit, and Bills really do need to start addressing long term roster management this year. The high cap number is a near-term illusion.

Thinking beyond this season and getting more production for your money. I don't care about guarantees on long term deals as much as production in return for the guarantee. I'd rather have Bills swing for the fences with Yannick or equal player if he's somehow available in first week of FA. If not, then you look at second tier, like Shaq who you can sign for 3-4 years at under $8 AAV, and prioritize DE in the draft. Murphy sticks out like a sore thumb on the equivalent $10 million one-year contract. Would you rather have him or Gerald McCoy for one year at that price?

The AAV goes out the window in the last year of the contract. Murphy is not $7 million AAV, but almost $10 million in 2020. I don't advocate cutting him outright at this moment. But, he's be a prime cut candidate three days into FA.

Spotrac estimates Shaq's AAV to be $7.7 million. Murphy will count over $9 million against the cap, and is slated to make over $8 million in cash. Those are all above his contribution levels, just like Star. His dead cap is only $1.75 million. Bills can easily replace Murphy's contributions at a much lower cost.

How could they ignore Duck Donuts? A travesty of epic proportions.